A.Monfries Vs K.Simpson

[Bigdon]

i dont think this one has been done before, both highley skilled youngsters, would be a close one i think

 

[Smell The Glove]

Re: A.Monfires Vs K.Simpson

Considering you havent got a poll on a Polls Board thread, nor can you even spell the name of one of your own players right, your silly little thread doesnt not warrant a legitimate response.

 

[Bigdon]

Re: A.Monfires Vs K.Simpson

Considering you havent got a poll on a Polls Board thread, nor can you even spell the name of one of your own players right, your silly little thread doesnt not warrant a legitimate response.

look again, and sorry spell check loser

 

[Bigdon]

Re: A.Monfires Vs K.Simpson

wow five nil

 

[BedlamHawk]

Monfries easily, can kick bags of goals as well as pushing into the midfield, very talented player.

 

[Upgrayedd]

Monfries, type of player who could win you matches with seconds to go

 

[facemaker]

Monfies easily. I mean who is Kade Simpson anyway. Only gets a game because the side is garbage. Monfries will be one of the most dominant midfielders in the game within 2 years.

 

[Bigdon]

Monfies easily. I mean who is Kade Simpson anyway. Only gets a game because the side is garbage. Monfries will be one of the most dominant midfielders in the game within 2 years.

i think thats a bit harsh, i rate simpson highly he just needs to move from that rabble club

 

[makethat2]

Monfries by far. Kade Simpson is good but gets most of his stats in the back half with no pressure Monfries is courageous little fella who uses the ball well and kicks some freaky goals.

 

[Bigdon]

2 people have voted for simpson, i wonder if they are carlton supporters

 

[douls]

Monfries looks like he will be a good player, not too hard with the duds he lines up next to, but Simpson has him well covered especially considering Monfires was taken at pick 14

 

[DapperDon]

Re: A.Monfires Vs K.Simpson

Considering you havent got a poll on a Polls Board thread, nor can you even spell the name of one of your own players right, your silly little thread doesnt not warrant a legitimate response.

this sounds like the response of somebody who knows their team has the lesser player

Monfries is a game breaker, Simpson is like Chad Fletcher (on field) heaps of touches does nothing with them.

Monfries easily.

 

[facemaker]

i think thats a bit harsh, i rate simpson highly he just needs to move from that rabble club

Maybe, but he does get soft possessions. Reminds of Ron Delulio from the mid nineties. All show but nothing to offer.

 

[DapperDon]

Monfries looks like he will be a good player, not too hard with the duds he lines up next to, but Simpson has him well covered especially considering Monfires was taken at pick 14

what areas does Simpson have over Monfries? don't go overating your players or anything

 

[douls]

Monfries will be one of the most dominant midfielders in the game within 2 years.

One of the most dominant at Essendon anyway.

 

[douls]

Maybe, but he does get soft possessions. Reminds of Ron Delulio from the mid nineties. All show but nothing to offer.

You remind me of Bozo the clown.

 

[douls]

what areas does Simpson have over Monfries? don't go overating your players or anything

has him covered in just about every area actaully bloke


http://www.footywire.com/afl/footy/ft_player_compare?tid1=4&pid1=446&tid2=6&pid2=1497

 

[DapperDon]

taking away home supporting votes so far it's 100% Monfries.

Kade who?

 

[douls]

Re: A.Monfires Vs K.Simpson

this sounds like the response of somebody who knows their team has the lesser player

Monfries is a game breaker, Simpson is like Chad Fletcher (on field) heaps of touches does nothing with them.

Monfries easily.

now you're just being ignorant, but i expect that of you

 

[douls]

taking away home supporting votes so far it's 100% Monfries.

Kade who?

Damn, Kade must be crap then

 

[DapperDon]

has him covered in just about every area actaully bloke


http://www.footywire.com/afl/footy/ft_player_compare?tid1=4&pid1=446&tid2=6&pid2=1497

lets not look into the fact Monfries has played up forward since he's started whilst Kade whatshisname played in the middle only averages 5 more disposals a game.

Monfries will overtake Kate Sampson this year, put your house on it.

 

[facemaker]

has him covered in just about every area actaully bloke


http://www.footywire.com/afl/footy/ft_player_compare?tid1=4&pid1=446&tid2=6&pid2=1497

Lol. Soft possies. I dont know why we are even discussing this. Listen stooge, once monfries moves in2 the midfield full time he will carve up anything simpson has to offer.

 

[douls]

Listen to you knobs. You know Kade is better but you have to be ignorant to claim he is crap. Typical Essendon response. If you beleive the crap you actually write i pity you

 

[Moss Rocket]

I think Monfries is bombers best midfielder. Simpson is our 4th best.
That said, Simpson by a nose.

 

[douls]

Monfries will overtake Kate Sampson this year, put your house on it.

So you admit that Kade is in front of Monfries then? Finally your brain is working again