Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
David Koch?lol at Hinkley's presser, is there a bigger whinger and excuse maker in the game?
OK. Here it is frame by frame. Btw I’m so happy you won for our sake. Go crows
View attachment 538092
View attachment 538100
I can’t believe this is even a discussionCool. Now instead of extracting stills from one angle allegedly showing shadows, have a look at the footage taken from the other angle, as shown on the screen at the game and in the post match on the telecast. Not the footage where the ball crosses the post, the footage where you can actually see the ball pass to the right of the post.
"But to deal with that last moment, where the player acknowledges it's hit the post and the AFL, in a billion-dollar industry, can wreck seasons for football clubs that work too hard."
Firstly, Jenkins said he thought it hit the post he didn't acknowledge anything.
Secondly, Port lost the possessions, clearances, tackles, stoppages, marks in side 50, entries into forward 50 and scoring shots. Yet it is the AFL system that wrecked their season? Man up and say "we were beaten by a more committed side when our final spot was on the line" instead of sooking about a goal review.
OK. Here it is frame by frame. Btw I’m so happy you won for our sake. Go crows
View attachment 538092
View attachment 538100
Frame by frame? Are those two pics meant to be posted in the correct order of movement/frame out of curiosity? Because if you have it the wrong way around, people here can assume the second frame is the latter one and the ball is moving to the left of the goal post. When in reality the later frame is the first one, the ball is moving to the right side of the post, which is clearly obvious when you look at the slow motion replay and watch the direction the umpire is moving
No issues with the decision. In just about ANY sport that has replays, unless the decision on a score is clear cut to be overruled, the benefit of the doubt almost always goes towards the attacking team. There was nothing clear cut about any of the footages shown. Unfortunately unless the AFL comes up with some kind of built in sensors or some kind of heat/hot spot kind of technology, then all those close calls will always be contentious, depending if you're the got it right winning team or the we got screwed losing team.
Regardless Adelaide were the better team and Port had plenty of time to run out the game and steal it, or create more chances before that final goal. To base it on one decision well before the siren is a cop out. Fair enough if it was on the siren itself
Yes the pics are backwards, there is no argument if ur went through the goals or not.Frame by frame? Are those two pics meant to be posted in the correct order of movement/frame out of curiosity? Because if you have it the wrong way around, people here can assume the second frame is the latter one and the ball is moving to the left of the goal post. When in reality the later frame is the first one, the ball is moving to the right side of the post, which is clearly obvious when you look at the slow motion replay and watch the direction the umpire is moving
Yes the pics are backwards, there is no argument if ur went through the goals or not.
Only if it did or didn’t hit the post.
A series of pictures can be.By backwards you mean start of kick before it travels back to left?
A pic cannot be backwards.
Who cares. You lost we won. Move on or let it derail your season. Either way things just got tougher for Port.By backwards you mean start of kick before it travels back to left?
A pic cannot be backwards.
You aren’t even describing a picture.By backwards you mean start of kick before it travels back to left?
A pic cannot be backwards.
OK. Here it is frame by frame. Btw I’m so happy you won for our sake. Go crows
View attachment 538092
View attachment 538100
Conveniently ignores Gray where the ball bounced backwards earlier in the same game.Monfries s**t at goal was a **** up that bounced the right way and got lucky and won you guys the match and you guys managed to find a way to "give a mouthful when you know you won it through a **** up".
Ports a disgrace.What a disgrace
Sent from my SM-G955F using Tapatalk
If you believe banter should be one-sided your problem.
It wasn’t banter, you twit. It was abuse.
Next time stay out of it.
It wasn’t banter, you twit. It was abuse.
Next time stay out of it.
By backwards you mean start of kick before it travels back to left?
A pic cannot be backwards.
Yes, yes they are.Those images are backwards I believe.