A competition made up of teams based on star signs would be more interesting than SOO.
State of Origin finishes with 1.792M metro viewers, up from last year
Only the GF is comparable in AFL footy.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
A competition made up of teams based on star signs would be more interesting than SOO.
I don't want it.
I have no affiliation to Victoria outside of being born and living here. I don't "support" Victoria, I support North Melbourne and that's all I care about, not some nothing state tournament.
With all due respect, I think it’s a bit analogous to the little brother really really really caring about beating big brother, but big brother wins more often than not and doesn’t really GAF.I very much have an affiliation to WA but half the players I'd be expected to support would be eagles players. Nah, I have no interest in that.
(Ok the next few years might be ok since the eagles don't have any players good enough to make the state team)
Oh come on there is no way that NSW or QLD would have better talent than a top AFL team.I'm for it, showcase Australian football as the only true national sport. The reason it died off was because Victoria became too powerful. Therefore you do what they do in under 18s and have the following during the bye weekend:
Vic metro v Vic country
W.a v s.a
Nsw v qld
All 6 sides are stronger than the top AFL club side, there was a research done on it a few years ago using statistical data to prove this point. It sells the game nationally and we get to see the best of the best going at it. Year two the winner of s.a v w.a plays the winner of metro v country.
Well that could be lucky for you.......I don't want it.
I have no affiliation to Victoria outside of being born and living here. I don't "support" Victoria, I support North Melbourne and that's all I care about, not some nothing state tournament.
State of Origin finishes with 1.792M metro viewers, up from last year
Only the GF is comparable in AFL footy.
Go Geminis!A competition made up of teams based on star signs would be more interesting than SOO.
I think State of Origin has a place. Mainly because with 18 teams and counting, the AFL has so many poor standard players playing each week, we are far away from ever seeing our game at its absolute best.
Just have one game per year late April/early May. Any player that makes themselves unavailable automatically misses the next round and pay the players well. Vic, SA, WA, Allies and change the fixture each year so every team plays each other home and away over a period of time. Allies take their home games around the country.
Don't worry. No one else cares about AFL SOO anyway. Rugby League have taken the concept beyond anything the AFL can muster.
The one issue with that is either you have some weird seven-team round robin with multiple rounds which clubs will never agree to, or no winner.If we are to have it back, the Allies concept must die.
We are getting enough players from NSW, QLD, Tasmania and the NT for them to have their own teams in their own right.
The one issue with that is either you have some weird seven-team round robin with multiple rounds which clubs will never agree to, or no winner.
Half the players would pull out due to "injury". Victoria might still be impressive, but WA and SA would quickly be reduced to some pretty ordinary players for what should be a showcase. The ones who did play would be going half-paced trying not to get injured. I don't think it would be very compelling, although I guess it could be high scoring.
I'd say there is more (but still slim) chance of some kind of All-Star exhibition game in a bye week between prelim and GF (as per NFL). The AFL could rotate it around the country.
I cannot see players wanting this. It eats into two weeks of their own holidays, for a start…Not really.
My ideal concept is a SOO National Carnival held the week after the AFL Grand Final with the final of it on NRL Grand Final day and up against it LIVE, every 2 years.
Division 1:
Victoria
Western Australia
South Australia
New South Wales
Division 2:
Queensland
Tasmania
Northern Territory
ACT
Bottom of Division 1 is relegated and top of Division 2 is promoted. Winners of the 2 Divisions play off for the National Championship. As I said to Craig Lambert on Twitter on Thursday, we have a national game. Let's showcase it.
I'm for it, showcase Australian football as the only true national sport. The reason it died off was because Victoria became too powerful. Therefore you do what they do in under 18s and have the following during the bye weekend:
Vic metro v Vic country
W.a v s.a
Nsw v qld
All 6 sides are stronger than the top AFL club side, there was a research done on it a few years ago using statistical data to prove this point. It sells the game nationally and we get to see the best of the best going at it. Year two the winner of s.a v w.a plays the winner of metro v country.
Half the players would pull out due to "injury". Victoria might still be impressive, but WA and SA would quickly be reduced to some pretty ordinary players for what should be a showcase. The ones who did play would be going half-paced trying not to get injured. I don't think it would be very compelling, although I guess it could be high scoring.
I'd say there is more (but still slim) chance of some kind of All-Star exhibition game in a bye week between prelim and GF (as per NFL). The AFL could rotate it around the country.
Who cares about their pathetic state rivalry.
Brain-dead game for brain dead fans.
I’m not sure if you’ve been to the footy recently but not too many fans have to pick between the game and their local MENSA meetingWho cares about their pathetic state rivalry.
Brain-dead game for brain dead fans.