Shell
Premium Platinum
How do they not have CCTV? You can see about 8 screens next to the driver's panel when you peer in.
Iirc guy on AW said 1/3 of trams have CCTV. All NEW trams have it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How do they not have CCTV? You can see about 8 screens next to the driver's panel when you peer in.
Does anyone know if there are CCTV cameras on every bus, tram and train? If not, there should be.AW- PT spokesman confirmed there is CCTV footage of the tram and Aya
Does anyone know if there are CCTV cameras on every bus, tram and train? If not, there should be.
Im fairly certain the council for Sydney rd took their sweet ass time installing more cameras in that area. And a private business captured the actual interactions with jill and adrian (well one of them anyway )which led to his arrest.
If it is a known offender then the DNA match should be incoming very quickly.
Yes, the Moreland Council argued that the cost (~$120,000 from memory) could not be justified and that cameras don't prevent crime, they just aid in solving crime, at least that was their opinion. I believe the footage of Adrian Bayley was from inside a bridal shop.Im fairly certain the council for Sydney rd took their sweet ass time installing more cameras in that area. And a private business captured the actual interactions with jill and adrian (well one of them anyway )which led to his arrest.
What led to his arrest was his phone being pinged in the same location as hers after Police ran a trace for know Sex Offenders in the area. Initially they were wasting time chasing the husband.
A vigilante attack on the predator.
Would be easy to say enough is enough....but it is actually way to much and disgusting. Was too much and adequately highlighted with Jill Meaghsr.
How do we tolerate this as a society?
How do we accept domestic violence and wanton, random, opportunistic acts like this consistently?
Stop reporting road deaths and start reporting this to keep it front and centre.
Start with those that object to Gillette this week, I mean, really?
How many more have to senselessly and violently die before it is not OK?
No just follow someone behaving suspiciously.So what everyone forms a lynch mob and attacks those who they think may be a culprit?
The police know who did it..
Yes he will be caught unless kills him selfAnymore dets? Arrest imminent?
The police know who did it..
What led to his arrest was his phone being pinged in the same location as hers after Police ran a trace for know Sex Offenders in the area. Initially they were wasting time chasing the husband.
Save taxpayers money.Yes he will be caught unless kills him self
They weren't wasting their time as a very large percentage of the time, it is the husband.
People saying this has to STOP and women have to be able to get home safely.
All very true, but there is no way to make it STOP right now.
I think soon there will be ways of making it STOP but whether society is ready for what that would entail - some pretty brutal eugenics - is another questions.
Reality is that Melbourne is a very, very safe place for women and that "stranger danger" gets the headlines, but it is family violence that is the real killer.
We tend to get one high profile stranger murder a year (more happen sure, and one is too many anyway) but one woman a week is being murdered by her partner.
Jill Meagher did the same thing- got on the phone with someone when Bayley was stalking her.
Obviously does s**t all.
True. But if there is no evidence it pays to conduct an investigation and assessing the evidence. Not just zero in on one target based on a hunch.
As in this case. Yes there is a very real urgency to get this offender off the streets pronto but you need to investigate fully and get your facts right.
What brutal eugenics? Are you arguing this is genetic? Also the 50 women murdered domestically how do you quantify that with whatever brutal measures? (As in is there a discernable pattern)
If there was a simple answer it would've been implemented already.
I'm saying that very very soon - next couple of years, within the decade at least - we will know the genes that affect this type of thing.
But it won't be a simple yes/no thing. It will be a thing where a woman does a test when pregnant, and they'll come back saying your embryo has genes that make it 50 per cent more likely than average for them to get certain cancers, 70 per cent heart disease, and oh they have the gene associated with random sexual violence.
As in, 95 per cent of men who commit these random sexual murders have this gene. But it doesn't mean that everyone who has this gene becomes a murderer.
There'll be a strong argument from many to simply "wipe" that gene out. But what if that same gene is associated with postive stuff as well, or you need it in your soldiers?
That kind of stuff.
If there was a simple answer it would've been implemented already.