You're seriously comparing Ablett to Rance?Going on the consensus that Rance shouldn't be selected in part due to him missing 5 games through injury,If thats the case Ablett's no chance either.
Yes Rance has been good but Ablett was phenomenal!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

WB v SYD · RIC v MEL · HAW v GCS · ESS v COL · PA v GEE · FRE v CAR · StK v WCE · BL v ADE · GWS v NM ·
Weekend Wrap and "Liked, Learned, Hated" right here -- How did tipping go?
Fantasy Footy Notice Image Round 7
SuperCoach Rd 7 SC Talk - Trade Talk - Capt/VC ,//, AFL Fantasy Rd 7 AFF Talk - AF Trades - Capt/VC
You're seriously comparing Ablett to Rance?Going on the consensus that Rance shouldn't be selected in part due to him missing 5 games through injury,If thats the case Ablett's no chance either.
squad maybe, too many good HFF flankers and then breust who is just a lock. Directly and indirectly competing for a spot with parker, breust, harvey, gray, beams and alike. Just can't see it.Ballas a chance? 49 goals after missing 4 games.
As far as KPF go I think I'd have:-
HF: xx Franklin XX
FF: Rough Hawkins XX
Rather than Rough and Franklin across the FF and N Riewoldt at CHF. Possibly harsh on Nick but didn't appear to me to finish the season as strongly as he started (but I'll readily admit also I didn't catch as much of the Saints as other teams).
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
And so have Hooker, Talia and MackenzieRance has been a good defender the last 3 seasons in a row, and was unlucky not to be in the squad of 40 last year. People saying he's only had a good half of the season are only showing that they haven't seen much of him.
He hasn't had a good second half of this year, he has had a mammoth second half of this year.
So you have told usAnd so have Hooker, Talia and Mackenzie
Ability wise obviously not.Just the injury status of both in regards to the selection criteria.You're seriously comparing Ablett to Rance?
Yes Rance has been good but Ablett was phenomenal!
Ability wise obviously not.Just the injury status of both in regards to the selection criteria.
More than likely.It's not really the same. Ablett was so good in the games he played that he earned AA selection and wasn't really competing a the same level as his peers. Rance is coming from behind and while his form is comparable to the other top KPDs in the comp, it'll come down to games played being the point of difference.
Rance also has chaplin as a key defender and can a lot of the time play third man up which leads to him getting so many contested marks, i have never seen the other three getting third man up marks cause they're full backsRance has been a good defender the last 3 seasons in a row, and was unlucky not to be in the squad of 40 last year. People saying he's only had a good half of the season are only showing that they haven't seen much of him.
He hasn't had a good second half of this year, he has had a mammoth second half of this year.
Rance also has chaplin as a key defender and can a lot of the time play third man up which leads to him getting so many contested marks, i have never seen the other three getting third man up marks cause they're full backs
yes but i think one of the things that people think put alex rance up there is the fact that he makes up for his not always the greatest disposal via intercept marking, which for a fullback in an AA squad should be just as irrelvant as the number of goals a fullback kicksSo your saying Rance gets the AA BP spot whilst the other three are competing for the FB spot? That seems a bit unfair, they all play the key backman role and should really be considered for one of 3 positions available to tall defenders in the backline.
B: Cale Hooker - Eric Mackenzie - Nick Smith
HB: Brodie Smith - Daniel Talia - Nick Malceski
C: Dyson Heppell - Josh P. Kennedy - Jordan Lewis
HF: Robbie Gray - Nick Riewoldt - Dayne Beams
F: Luke Breust - Lance Franklin - Jarryd Roughead
R: Aaron Sandilands - Nat Fyfe - Joel Selwood
I/C: Luke Parker - Tom Rockliff - Gary Ablett - Brent Harvey
If Ballantyne had avoided getting suspended he'd probably be my next in along with Pendlebury, Jacobs and Rance.
yes but i think one of the things that people think put alex rance up there is the fact that he makes up for his not always the greatest disposal via intercept marking, which for a fullback in an AA squad should be just as irrelvant as the number of goals a fullback kicks
yes but i think one of the things that people think put alex rance up there is the fact that he makes up for his not always the greatest disposal via intercept marking, which for a fullback in an AA squad should be just as irrelvant as the number of goals a fullback kicks

Roughead averaged more goals per game for one, Roughead also doubled Hawkins tackles per game and averaged more disposals.Hawkins is number one in the comp for contested marks, marks inside 50, and equal 2nd in the coleman. So how can he not be in the side before Roughead or Riewoldt?![]()
Surely it would be Mackenzie before Rance? Surely?Robbo's team
B: Michael Hibberd (Ess) Alex Rance (Rich) Cale Hooker (Ess)
HB: Nick Malceski (Syd) Daniel Talia (Adel) Brodie Smith (Adel)
C: Tom Rockliff (Bris) Josh Kennedy (Syd) Nathan Fyfe (Frem)
HF: Brent Harvey (NM) Lance Franklin (Syd) Robbie Gray (PA)
F: Luke Breust (Haw) Jarryd Roughead (Haw) Jack Gunston (Haw)
Foll: Sam Jacobs (Adel) Joel Selwood (C, Geel) Gary Ablett (GC)
Inter: Luke Parker (Syd), Dyson Heppell (Ess), Jordan Lewis (Haw), Jarrad McVeigh (VC, Syd)
Heally, Dunstal and Sheahan also had Rance AASurely it would be Mackenzie before Rance? Surely?
Why did you bring it up then?In b4 Richmond supporters talking about Rance
Surely it would be Mackenzie before Rance? Surely?