Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That is more profound than many here will accept.If I agreed with you that there was no evidence I wouldn't believe.
Yes it is ask a Christian but not debate a Christian. Read the opening postThe point of this thread is to Ask a Christian; to ask questions, and to hopefully get them answered. I'm looking at you, Vdubs.
Could you summarize - without prejudicing the argument - A Case for Christ by Lee Strobel?
In any case:
Earl Doherty on *The Case for Christ*
Earl Doherty on *The Case for Christ* Lee Strobel's The Case for Christwww.caseagainstfaith.comTaylor Carr's Review of The Case for Christ
The Case for Christ by Lee Strobel Reviewed by Taylor Carr - June 1st, 2011 Originially published on GodlessHaven.com Reprinted with permission.www.caseagainstfaith.com
Jesus has had more books written about him and more songs sung about him then anyone.So they need a second book to make a case for the first book?
I actually agree with you. Look at both sides of the argument and than make a decision.Or you could read this one
Nailed - David Fitzgerald
(Sub Title: Ten Christian Myths That Show Jesus Never Existed At All)
CS Lewis was an inspiration for many like me. Mere Christianity and The Screwtape Letters are great starters.I actually agree with you. Look at both sides of the argument and than make a decision.
If we want to have a debate between believers and sceptics we may as well jump off here and watch the likes of Lennox v Damon's as I'm sure both of them are far more intelligent than any of us on here.CS Lewis was an inspiration for many like me. Mere Christianity and The Screwtape Letters are great starters.
Some of the army here are way beyond skeptics.If we want to have a debate between believers and sceptics we may as well jump off here and watch the likes of Lennox v Damon's as I'm sure both of them are far more intelligent than any of us on here.
I know people would deny this but some people just don't want to believe, some think they are too good for God, some don't like the idea of submission.Some of the army here are way beyond skeptics.
Perhaps.I know people would deny this but some people just don't want to believe, some think they are too good for God, some don't like the idea of submission.
I have no issues with sceptics. I was sceptical myself at first.
Maybe some do believe but don't want to admit it.
I'd love to talk to some of these guys face to face and not over a keyboard about their beliefs.
Yes it is ask a Christian but not debate a Christian.
Because nearly all the time people are just wanting to debate it.That it is. Why not ask believers to provide robust evidence for claimed historical events such as the resurrection? Why not ask about the origins and concept of God and the concept of Satan? Why not ask about the concept of sin?
Why not question responses and ask for further clarification / justification?
That's understandable when you have no evidence.I'm not going to debate you I'm not interested in debating non-believers.
And religion lost every time?It's been done to death by people far more intelligent than you and I.
Some people want evidence before believing things.I know people would deny this but some people just don't want to believe, some think they are too good for God, some don't like the idea of submission.
Absolutely. Some folks think the pathological irrationality demanded by religion is bad for society and should be discouraged.Some of the army here are way beyond skeptics.
...Yes it is ask a Christian but not debate a Christian. Read the opening post
Christianity is not a cult, and conspiracy theories abound in this thread.Absolutely. Some folks think the pathological irrationality demanded by religion is bad for society and should be discouraged.
You guys aren't as far removed from QAnon as you'd like to think.
What's the difference?Christianity is not a cult
Who cares? You have your own agenda and none of your questions are for your edification. You already have your knowledge AND OPINIONS, and any reply we make is substandard and unacceptable for you....
Tell me, are you aware of what the word forum means? Its origins?
No, it is not. It helps when one actually answers a question, ever.Who cares? You have your own agenda and none of your questions are for your edification. You already have your knowledge AND OPINIONS, and any reply we make is substandard and unacceptable for you.
Sounds like something a cult member would say.Who cares? You have your own agenda and none of your questions are for your edification. You already have your knowledge AND OPINIONS, and any reply we make is substandard and unacceptable for you.
Just another BS artist on the gravy train!If your interested in the evidence I'd suggest a book such as a case for Christ by Lee Strobel.
Having hung around this thread long enough this year, it's obvious what the genuine questions are.Or, are you going to run away again, Vdubs? Would God approve of how uneager you are to expose a gentile to the words of the true faith?
Because nearly all the time people are just wanting to debate it.
I would love there to be an ask an atheist thread as there are lots of questions I'd be interested to ask the atheists on here
You are like a dog at a bone. It is too difficult for me to consider.No, it is not. It helps when one actually answers a question, ever.
Take you, for instance. Are you going to answer whether you think that non-christians are capable of love any time soon, or are you going to continue ignoring the question? Surely, it isn't that hard, is it?