jackcass
Cancelled
I think the criticism of Harvey is deserved. It's hard to judge assistant coaches so I stick to the area of the field they're responsible for and how that area has performed. We have had a strong midfield right through Harvey's tenure with us. He hasn't done poorly however we are consistently beaten at centre clearances despite a strong midfield and ruck.
In our two biggest losses of recent times, last years grand final, this years prelim, a big reason for the failure was because the midfield was beaten. Against West Coast they nuetralised Grundy by targetting his right side and tag teaming him and their midfield structures won them clearances, and them the game.
I personally don't think it's as black and white as Harvey being a good vs bad coach, it's more nuanced than that. He appears a meticulous and hard working coach from comments made by people at the club. But I reckon we are a bit predictable and don't think on our feet/prepare alternative plans when things aren't working for us. I wonder if Harvey would be worth using in an oppo analysis type role and bring in someone with some new ideas for the midfield.
Can coaching compensate for deficiencies in the playing group he's got to work with? For example, we've heard a couple of times this year about competing interests wanting Crisp in both the defense and the midfield group. You'd imagine it'd be the same with others like JDG. Or being stuck with (for example) using Mayne on a wing when you'd rather have a Darren Millane or Keith Grieg clone, or a fit and healthy Wells.
It's also interesting that sides like Carlton and Port who were good with clearances this year got no impact from the midfield group beyond the clearances whereas sides that were poorer at clearances like Pies (CL - 14th; CCL - 16th), Tigers (CL - 18th; CCL - 10th) and Hawks (CL - 17th; CCL - 18th) got more from the midfield group beyond the clearances.
It's about balance and cohesion. I don't think we had much of either this year.





