Assistant coaches - what changes coming?

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
What has happened to the Geelong fans who still believe that signing on Chris Scott was the best thing for the Geelong Football Club? 3 final wins since the 2011 Grand Final and we have exited the finals when it counts.

The fact is Chris Scott has extended his tenure at the club until 2022. We have to accept that but we cannot accept sub standard performances in September. Winning finals and winning the flag determines the club’s legacy and brand ( short term and long term future).

As I have said on numerous occasions, we are in the window to win a flag. But, the skill execution level of the bottom 10 to 20 players are not good enough to stand up in the September cauldron. Why do we bow out of the finals every year and fall short? It comes down to skill execution, decision making and a lack of good assistant coaches on the club’s coaching staff.

Chris Scott is the man manager of the assistant coaches. He relies on his assistants to do the bulk of the work (post game analysis; analysing the trends in the game; organising skill sessions; developing game strategies; devising training drills to reflect game strategies; analysing the opposition and been in charge of defence, forward and mids on game day). They are his extra eyes. During the week, they have a meeting to discuss and formulate a game strategy and to select the team.

Over time, the players will naturally become mentally tired of hearing the voice of a couple of assistant coaches who have been at the club for a long time. It is perfectly normal. Some players become mentally stale or jaded in hearing the same voice. Secondly, the head coach may need to hear a couple of new voices with fresh ideas who can challenge him intellectually and mentally on match day and during the week. A heated debate in match committee where everyone has a different view is the best thing for the club. A group consensus will be reached because everyone has a different opinion.

Matthew Knights has been at the club since 2012 ; Jason Rahilly has been at the club since 2009 and Nigel Lappin has been at the club since 2008. In the best interests of the club, the Cats have to move them on for 3 new voices who can help Geelong in:

1) Developing the 0-100 game players so their skills can stand up in the big games (finals).
2) Developing new game strategies and becoming the leader in game strategy development. At the minute, Richmond is the leader with the Hawks coming 2nd.
3) Keeping the Head Coach Chris Scott on his toes. The best thing for the club is for the Head Coach to be surrounded by assistant coaches with different views and different theories on the game so he can be challenged intellectually so he can devise a game plan that is the leader in the AFL.
4) Prevent complacency in creeping into the club. David Parkin wrote a great comment in June 1988: “Satisfaction is a great depressant to motivation”. At the minute we are satisfied in finishing in the 8. Finishing in the 8 is not good enough with the list we have at the minute.

REPLACEMENTS

Who cares about the Footy Dept cap. Richmond in 2016 cleaned out its assistant coaches and brought in new ones. Collingwood in 2017 brought in Justin Langmuir and Buddha Hocking and moved on a number of assistant coaches. Fresh voices on the coaching staff have pushed Damian Hardwick and Nathan Buckley out of their comfort zone. The results are on the board.

In my opinion the Cats should approach Mick McGuane to head game strategy and skill development; Mark Choco Williams (developing the 0 to 100 gamers: Skills and decision making acquisition coach) and Brad Johnson (he lives in Torquay) to look after the forwards. I would also hope the Cats would ring up Greg Diesel Williams and Gary Ablett Senior to help out the mids and forwards on a part time basis.

History has shown that when great coaches turn over their assistants, the club’s fortunes turn around. There is no need to sack and delist players and to sack the head coach. The head coach needs a couple of new assistants to compliment Scarlett and Enright.

What the players and Chris Scott need is people with different voices and ideas to win us a flag and to develop the 0 to 100 gamers into September performers.
You could have saved yourself and your readers a lot of time if you had simply said
I think we should replace some assistant coaches because "some" players "might" like to hear a new voice.
 
Agree, sometimes it’s not always the head coach that has to be the one to go for success to come.

Richmond (2016) & Collingwood (2017) both did it after missing the finals, then the very next year Richmond win the Premiership, and Collingwood finish 3rd in H&A and make it into at least a Semi Final even with lots of injuries.

Chris Scott is staying like it or not, but I agree that the assistant coaches need moving around, not all of them but at least some of them.

Knights needs to go, we need a better midfield coach who helps our midfield become better & more consistent, as well as more composed under pressure.

Someone like O’Bree as VFL coach should be moved on as well I reckon.

You’ve done well to name a few replacements for different positions as I have no idea about who I’d want replacing the ones I mentioned, it’s time for some change & some new voices, and if it’s not going to be the head coach then it should be some of the assistant coaches / VFL coach.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

My prediction of Geelong, for a following year, is usually pretty optimistic but I’m confident Geelong will be a 12th-16th positioned team next season. I think our time as a formidable force has well and truly expired. As a club we’re basically back to where we were in the late 90’s - early .


Nope, we will finish higher then that. There are some real shithouse teams in the AFL right now, with various degrees of shithouse
 
On a purely reactionary call (totally out of character)
James Rahilly out. Has no place anywhere near out forward line.
We can’t mark, chase, tackle, convert goals, crumb marking contests, or kick straight.
Other than that....
 
Last edited:
On a purely reactionary call (totally out of character)
James Rahilly out. Has no place anywhere near out forward line.
We can’t mark, chase, tackle, conversation goals, crumb marking contests, or kick straight.
Other than that....
so why not sack the forwards coach
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

We get criticised for not hanging onto Joel Corey, Scarlett etc, yet when we do employ Boris, Scarlo, it gets labelled with "inbreeding".
Can not please everybody with all decisions.
But, I would love Sam Mitchell to enter our cattery.
 
Sam Mitchell? I assume he's working with the mids at WC? On ability their midfield is workman like at best (excluding Yeo who's a star) yet sat 2nd and now in a prelim.
 
I wonder who selects the assistant coaches
the senior coach or someone higher up

if there are changes then we will know the club is serious
 
I put this in the CS coaching thread but I think its relevant here as well. Essentially the article indicates that it was a debacle to keep Chris on. Article is from the Roar:

Truth be told, they should have won by plenty more as their physical pressure and manic approach to the game was something else. But the real story is on the other side of the ledger, where the Cats’ finals record slipped to 3-9 since they won their last flag in 2011.

In those 12 finals, they have won just four first quarters and on four occasions have been more than 30 points down at the first change. In finals, that is a death knell, especially in a sudden death game, of which all four of those were. There are many theories about a team that starts so slowly, on a consistent basis, in big games and coaching is one, but let’s park that one for now.


Geelong’s list is the third-oldest in the AFL in 2018 and the sixth most experienced. That list profile screams of a club that considers themselves in the premiership window, although the Cats have probably not considered themselves outside that window in the last decade.

Some of its oldest players are some of its best, but the list contains more than a few players around who there is a question mark. Either due to injury or lack of performance, the following middle-aged players are no longer deserving of a position on the list: George Horlin-Smith, Lachie Henderson, Aaron Black, Zac Smith, Daniel Menzel and Scott Selwood.

Some of those players have never had a good run of it in terms of their body, but Menzel has seemed checked out for most of the season and the hype far outweighs his performances, especially in big games. Scott Selwood was a solid foot soldier, maybe more but the game has gone well past someone with his limitations although his surname may keep him in a job.


Henderson was never more than a gap-filler and now has become a guy surplus to requirements with the development of Tom Stewart and Mark Blicavs, and the early promise shown by Mark O’Connor.

Move up the age list a little further, and it’s sad to say that Harry Taylor is done; he was a great servant, maybe more than that, but like Henderson, he is no longer worthy of a list spot.

Their ability to grab mature-age recruits has been remarkable – Sam Menegola and Tim Kelly are quality footballers, adding depth to an already stacked midfield. Of the young crew, Brandan Parfitt and Esava Ratugolea demand to be in the first 22 when fit, as do Jack Henry and Jake Kolodjashnij.


In Tom Hawkins they have an old-fashioned full-forward who is peaking at age 29; forget the All-Australian team, which was an absolute shambles – he is elite and as good as any key forward in the game. Joel Selwood and Patrick Dangerfield both turn 30 in the next 20 months; that is an alarming statistic, especially in Selwood’s case as his body has taken an absolute battering.


Dangerfield remains the mouthpiece of the AFL Players Association and is happy to voice his opinion on any subject, but he can’t hide from the fact that his recent finals performances have been, on the whole, sub-par. Now, when I say sub-par it is in the context of what he is – one of the best players of the generation. With that label comes the expectation that you play well when your team needs it. Not saying he has had many poor games, but his impact in finals has been well below what is expected, and his field kicking has always been a problem, which becomes magnified in September.


Selwood is a warrior and may actually be underrated as a footballer; to have won three best and fairest awards at such a strong club, and to walk into the 2007 side as a 19-year-old and demand respect immediately is incredible. He has drawn plenty of scrutiny over the years for ducking and trying to milk free kicks, but that’s noise – he is tough, skilful and resilient and it was a shock to see him play so poorly against Melbourne. His body language and general disgust after the game was a sign of great leadership; it meant the world to him to lose, and you wonder whether he glances around the change-rooms and wonder if it means that much to some of the other players.


The third gun in the midfield might be the best player of our generation and the oldest player on the list. Gary Ablett has given fans the absolute best of footy for well over a decade, and there seems to be plenty ready to pot him. The way he handled his last season at Gold Coast was questionable at best, grossly unprofessional at worst, but the fact remains that he has set the bar so very high, that anything less than perfection is criticised far too heavily. He has never been a strong tackler, nor paid much respect to opponents when it comes to running and chasing, but quite frankly he has never had to.


The vitriol spewing out of many media mouths this season about him being soft, past it and too slow is rubbish; he has to be the cream on the cake, not the cake itself. The issue with cream is that it has an expiry date, as do footballers…especially when they are 33 years old.


A cursory glance back over the names listed so far tell you one thing – this is a side absolutely stacked with talent and the list profile tells you the club consider themselves well within the premiership window. The fact is, that they are as far from winning a flag as most sides who didn’t even make the eight and while you can only make six to eight list changes a year, limiting their ability to turn over too many players, you can make a change that is far more impactful right now – move on from the coach.


Chris Scott apologists will argue that he is a premiership coach, and that he is. They will also say that sacking the coach is the easy way out, but this list doesn’t need a total overhaul, and only half a dozen list positions can realistically be turned over every season.


To coach the 2011 Geelong team to a flag is in effect having a car on cruise control; there is very little driving skill involved. That side was at the back end of the best five-year period in modern footy history and had as many as half a dozen on-field coaches. That grand final was memorable for a few reasons; Meatloaf managed to butcher every single word that came out of his mouth, and it was the high-point of Scott’s coaching career (obviously) in his first season. To be sitting here, seven years later, and having the quality of player he has had over the journey, and to have just three finals wins to show for it (with no grand final appearances and three preliminary finals losses by an average of 34 points, including two in which they scored one combined goal) is mediocre at best, and an absolute indictment at worst.


Geelong’s home ground advantage is arguably the best in the league, they have a multitude of quality and yet they finish 2018 in limbo, and as far away from being a flag contender as they have been since 2011. Ablett, Selwood, Dangerfield and Hawkins will all likely be lost to the game in the next three to four years and while the next crop looks strong, the coach hasn’t proven an ability to do anything other than fire off a decent cliché in a press conference. Re-signing Scott until the end of 2022 was one of two things – either blind faith in a coach who led the team to the summit of the mountain once and hasn’t gotten halfway up again since; or acceptance that this side will likely be around the mark as a finals team every year. If it is the former, the club owes their members and fans more.


If it’s the latter, it’s an indictment on a club that, along with Hawthorn, has set the standard for modern excellence and may actually have been ‘the greatest team of all’. As long as Scott remains in charge, Geelong fans can look forward to a whole lot more disappointment. A Great Scott, this is most definitely not.
 
He'd probably be great, personally though Id rather someone who's never played with, worked with or been coached by Chris Scott.
Also someone who demands to be listened to.
And not Mark Neeld. (Just have a feeling he'll try to get a job with us for some reason)
In would not mind Neeld. He is tough, but well educated, knows his stuff, and again is TOUGH. Is that not what we need?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top