Best utility in the AFL

[anti.]

no love for brent staker?

 

[Stifler's mom]

Has to be Buddy Franklin.

You know the rules people, we can't have a thread without him.

 

[edgehead47]

Pavlich>>>>>>>>>>>>Daylight>>>>>>>>>>>Cornes

Cornes is a good utility but Pavlich is a lot better playing forward than he is and very good back aswell (AA FB)

 

[El_Scorcho]

Cornes/Pavlich.

Pavlich is a better forward, and can play anywhere, but IMO, a fully fit team full of Chad Corneses would beat a fully fit team full of Matthew Pavlichs. Better in the midfield.

Not by much, and I am biased. It's clearly these two anyway, no one else is close.

 

[Carn Hawkas]

Hodge or Cornes.

 

[donbooger]

Lonergan (warning may be slightly biased)

 

[anti.]

hodge?

haha, he can play Half Back, Midfield and Half Forward...how versitile! i mean i dont know any players that can do that, he is certainly one of a kind.

judd could play half back or half forward if it wasnt a waste of his game time.

 

[TheBigT]

Lonergan (warning may be slightly biased)

Meh, still better than petrie. The OP's choices are crap though.
Richo in his running back into defence role?
Mooney used to play down back.
Waite is better than those listed.

 

[HolyWars]

Has to be Buddy Franklin.

You know the rules people, we can't have a thread without him.

Way to bring it up then

Hodge/Cornes (as much as I hate the prick)

 

[HolyWars]

hodge?

haha, he can play Half Back, Midfield and Half Forward...how versitile! i mean i dont know any players that can do that, he is certainly one of a kind.

judd could play half back or half forward if it wasnt a waste of his game time.

When he goes forward, he is extra damaging then the other utilities, a few times has kicked bags of 6. In the backline, his drive on the rebound is huge, he can still kick 3 or 4 running off HB (see his last 2 games). He only played half the game against the Pies and had 3?? from half back.

 

[MadMac]

When he goes forward, he is extra damaging then the other utilities, a few times has kicked bags of 6. In the backline, his drive on the rebound is huge, he still kicks 3 or 4 running off HB (see his last 2 games). He only played half the game against the Pies and had 3?? from half back.

As much as I like Hodge he's not as versatile as Pav and certainly not as good a player as Pav.

 

[HolyWars]

As much as I like Hodge he's not as versatile as Pav and certainly not as good a player as Pav.

Granted. I think Pav is better forward and great running from HB (I think he and Hodge are very close in backline ability), though Hodgies ability in the Midfield is better then Pavs.

I see them both on equal pegging (Sorry, forgot to add him with Hodge/Cornes)

 

[Brown n Gold]

As much as I like Hodge he's not as versatile as Pav and certainly not as good a player as Pav.

Hodge has far better skills, Vision and footy smarts.

Pav > Hodge CHF, CHB, FF, FB
Hodge > Pav EVERYWHERE ELSE

When Pav goes in the middle he has all the grunt of a Z4 driving hairdresser. Hodge's attack on the ball is as good as anyone in the comp.

 

[edgehead47]

Hodge has far better skills, Vision and footy smarts.

Pav > Hodge CHF, CHB, FF, FB
Hodge > Pav EVERYWHERE ELSE

When Pav goes in the middle he has all the grunt of a Z4 driving hairdresser. Hodge's attack on the ball is as good as anyone in the comp.

So Pav is a much more valuable player By everywhere else you mean the midfield and onball. Pav would beat Hodge in the ruck

 

[anti.]

pavs a greater onballer than hodge as well.

 

[Drummond]

Other- Aaron Kite.

 

[Drummond]

no love for brent staker?

Good call.