Biased/incompetent media coverage

[EagleShore]

Happy to not have much attention paid to us and fly under the radar.

We've been complaining about the media focusing on us too much the last week and now we're complaining when they don't

It's the good v the bad. But I agree it's not the worst thing for us to fly under the proverbial radar because in theory it affords us a psychological advantage.

The competition is going to be tighter in 2017 than possibly ever before with Melbourne, St Kilda, Port, Collingwood, Essendon, Fremantle, Richmond and even perhaps Brisbane causing some headaches for other teams vying for the 8. Gold Coast should also be better this year but Rocket appears to be a touch inept nowadays by comparison.

 

[Keys]

Happy to not have much attention paid to us and fly under the radar.

We've been complaining about the media focusing on us too much the last week and now we're complaining when they don't

Whilst I agree it's good to fly under the radar, it would have been nice to see Petrie's efforts acknowledged rather than 10 year old news

 

[Turboman1994]

Turbo goes pop.

 

[avishka5]

Turbo goes pop.

That sounds the wrong Twitter account for her. Her real one is @ritasstinkypunani

 

[Yamumluvsbigcox]

To be fair, Tom Lynch is the greatest forward of all time.

Darling was in the same draft class and he has kicked almost 40 more career goals than lynch . I doubt lynch gets as much s**t as darling

 

[Agent93]

Darling was in the same draft class and he has kicked almost 40 more career goals than lynch . I doubt lynch gets as much s**t as darling

To be fair Lynch beats Darling in nearly every per game stat except tackles. Jack's got 26 games on Lynch, but seems to have plateaued since 2013, whereas Lynch seems to be getting better.

 

[Yamumluvsbigcox]

To be fair Lynch beats Darling in nearly every per game stat except tackles. Jack's got 26 games on Lynch, but seems to have plateaued since 2013, whereas Lynch seems to be getting better.

jack is also second tall forward and lynch is the number 1 target . Darling doesn't get the same supply . Do you think lynch would have the same output behind JK ?

 

[Agent93]

jack is also second tall forward and lynch is the number 1 target . Darling doesn't get the same supply . Do you think lynch would have the same output behind JK ?

Don't know to be honest. Do you think JK would have the same supply with Lynch instead of Darling?

 

[avishka5]

 

[Keys]

Hahahaha


******* muppets

 

[Agent93]

Every god damn day. You can tell who the league and the journos that cover it don't give a s**t about.

 

[avishka5]

Rita 'dirty' punani must have wrote that.

 

[Agent93]

Rita 'dirty' punani must have wrote that.

Sometimes I forget this forum is populated by all ages. Attack the content, not the name, not the sex.

 

[Yamumluvsbigcox]

Sometimes I forget this forum is populated by all ages. Attack the content, not the name, not the sex.

triggered

 

[Agent93]

triggered

cucumber

 

[avishka5]

Sometimes I forget this forum is populated by all ages. Attack the content, not the name, not the sex.

I'm not attacking the sex. Women journos can be as bad as men and can be as good as the good male journos. Making funny of people's names is pretty common.

 

[lewigie]

I'm not attacking the sex. Women journos can be as bad as men and can be as good as the good male journos. Making funny of people's names is pretty common.

You'll get done by 18c mate

 

[Agent93]

Making funny of people's names is pretty common.

It is, true. But likening her, a female, to a crass name for a female sexual organ, and then further implying that it is bad, grotesque, or 'dirty', tends to produce a double standard which is not warranted.

By all means call her a hypocritical f-wit, which is something used to describe Barrett on a daily basis. Insults based on sex and gender aren't neccessary, or cool.

 

[wing it]

It is, true. But likening her, a female, to a crass name for a female sexual organ, and then further implying that it is bad, grotesque, or 'dirty', tends to produce a double standard which is not warranted.

By all means call her a hypocritical f-wit, which is something used to describe Barrett on a daily basis. Insults based on sex and gender aren't neccessary, or cool.

Does that mean you can't call someone a dick?

 

[wing it]

It is, true. But likening her, a female, to a crass name for a female sexual organ, and then further implying that it is bad, grotesque, or 'dirty', tends to produce a double standard which is not warranted.

By all means call her a hypocritical f-wit, which is something used to describe Barrett on a daily basis. Insults based on sex and gender aren't neccessary, or cool.

What about 'campaigner' ?

 

[Agent93]

Does that mean you can't call someone a dick?

It's like African-Americans using the 'n' word.

What about 'campaigner' ?

Please tell me that was a forum auto-correct

 

[Avalor]

I jumped through it and didn't see any WC footage

Nah, zero, zilch, donuts.

 

[Yamumluvsbigcox]

cucumber

Do you need a safe space ?

 

[Agent93]

Do you need a safe space ?

I thought we were just using random words that didn't add anything to conversation. I'll go again if you want:

slithering

 

[avishka5]

It is, true. But likening her, a female, to a crass name for a female sexual organ, and then further implying that it is bad, grotesque, or 'dirty', tends to produce a double standard which is not warranted.

By all means call her a hypocritical f-wit, which is something used to describe Barrett on a daily basis. Insults based on sex and gender aren't neccessary, or cool.

I call Barret a smelly ball sack. So I guess I'm consistent.