Righto must be good hootch tonightHe's by no means the answer to our lack of a fit and/or competent FF but he is clearly better than Dixon.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

LIVE: Western Bulldogs v Sydney - Rd 7 - 7:30PM Thu
Squiggle tips Dogs at 51% chance -- What's your tip? -- Injury Lists » -- All Rd 7 Games
BigFooty Tipping Notice Img
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Round 7
The Golden Ticket - Corporate tickets, functions, Open Air Boxes at the Adelaide Oval, ENGIE, Gabba, MCG, Marvel, Optus & People First Stadiums. Corporate Suites at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
Righto must be good hootch tonightHe's by no means the answer to our lack of a fit and/or competent FF but he is clearly better than Dixon.
No i would go old school and rotate Lobbe and Howard, resting one in a forward pocket or drop one back as needed, Dixon needs a foil.The principle is good, but Howard isn't physically ready to cary our ruck by himself, particularly against Geelong
I'm under no illusions about Butcher being able to mark against good defenders, he won't unless he comes over the back of the pack. However he can do that when others draw the attention of the defenders.
And he is mobile and can snaffle a few off the ground when play gets mixed up. That occasional demonstration of crumbing ability has always bumped up his figures when his set shot kicks have failed.
He's by no means the answer to our lack of a fit and/or competent FF but he is clearly better than Dixon.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
When the ball is delivered to Dixon out in front instead of on his head he will do his job, then also peel the 2 and sometimes 3 gorillas off his back he will take his fair share of marks. As much as i like butch he would have done no better in our current form.I'm under no illusions about Butcher being able to mark against good defenders, he won't unless he comes over the back of the pack. However he can do that when others draw the attention of the defenders.
And he is mobile and can snaffle a few off the ground when play gets mixed up. That occasional demonstration of crumbing ability has always bumped up his figures when his set shot kicks have failed.
He's by no means the answer to our lack of a fit and/or competent FF but he is clearly better than Dixon.
Wishful thinking - hope you're right though.
I still think there is a bloody good footballer in there somewhere. He just needs to believe it to.
Dixon is a forward who struggles when we get pasted in the midfield. Delist.
In all seriousness, assuming Dixon's body is sound, is it worth throwing him in the middle for a few bounces to get a feel for the game. At the moment he's barely sighting the ball and when he does he's usually being triple teamed reminiscent of Hawthorn on Fev when he was on 99 goals.
We know he doesn't need a lot of it to have an impact, but we need to find a way to work him into games.
Long story short bring in Butcher to throw his body around, provide another target and make space for him
They did throw him in the ruck in the second quarter sunday didn't they... I was so numb I can only vaguely remember.Dixon is a forward who struggles when we get pasted in the midfield. Delist.
In all seriousness, assuming Dixon's body is sound, is it worth throwing him in the middle for a few bounces to get a feel for the game. At the moment he's barely sighting the ball and when he does he's usually being triple teamed reminiscent of Hawthorn on Fev when he was on 99 goals.
We know he doesn't need a lot of it to have an impact, but we need to find a way to work him into games.
Long story short bring in Butcher to throw his body around, provide another target and make space for him
If he was proven he would have come in for Schulz when Howard did. Even when Howard was dropped he didn't get picked. Having a good crack doesn't mean SFA unfortunately.How is he not proven? Every AFL game I've seen him play he's at least had a crack. Amazing when he gets a decent run he does okay. He needs more than 3 in a row before we can make judgement. Honestly couldn't be any worse than that insipid performance we saw yesterday.
Seriously?..... He's by no means the answer to our lack of a fit and/or competent FF but he is clearly better than Dixon.
Sure he cant kick but those last games last year **** he was having a red hot go
And the crowd were behind him and so was the team and his confidence was sky high give the lankey prick a month of solid A'S footy and let him either make it or break it
They did. It was the sure sign of desparation.
I'm glad it happened, we popped the Dixon-in-the-ruck cherry and it paves the way for more in the future. Could kill Westhoff or Jacksons usefulness entirely.
Meanwhile in the last 3 weeks Trengove has a grand total of 0 hitouts.Ken in pre season - 'I can tell you we won't be using Dixon in the ruck at all'
Round 4 and Lobbe is being slaughtered in the ruck while we have 3 inside 50s for the entire game. Dixon into the ruck.
But Ken is stubborn?Ken in pre season - 'I can tell you we won't be using Dixon in the ruck at all'
Round 4 and Lobbe is being slaughtered in the ruck while we have 3 inside 50s for the entire game. Dixon into the ruck.

If he was proven he would have come in for Schulz when Howard did. Even when Howard was dropped he didn't get picked. Having a good crack doesn't mean SFA unfortunately.
Won't ruck, can't play defense in the new era of needing mobile KPDs. If he won't ruck, then goodbye Jacko, hello Clurey round 6 (to give him a run in the SANFL first).Meanwhile in the last 3 weeks Trengove has a grand total of 0 hitouts.