Yeah there’s a few.Random thought: Is this the team with the greatest number of hyphenated surname players?
Feels like they should be lining up for a Melbourne private school Old Boys club....
Imagine if we got Nas as well!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Yeah there’s a few.Random thought: Is this the team with the greatest number of hyphenated surname players?
Feels like they should be lining up for a Melbourne private school Old Boys club....
You forgot #SANFLBias as well.Port have #WealthBias, #VICBIAS and #Crowbias against them, so if he does win a flag with Port it will be glorious.
As a glorious Port Premier he will be forgiven one (1) floggish act eg personal payout on the club president on the podium.
Port have a beaut drive that borders on the insane,and that helped them do it once.
So while it is unlikely they can do it, they did it before, and I will sink a few in their honour if they do.
Bonus points if they beat the Crows, more likely it will be us because we are usually thereabouts and in Grand Finals vs the Pies the first ones free.
I think that's pretty accurate.Would have to trade and draft excellent for the next 2 years to put us in a position to have a list capable.
Keeping Butters is critical
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
How do you know that? Williams got Port further than Ken with a far weaker list than Ken mostly had in 2007. I've never understood this unproven assumption, that's like saying The Crows full potential was achieved under Robert Shaw in 1996.I believe Ken got the most out of that squad
I don't think he managed the team and its programs and some of the staff, that's clearly Hinkley since staff like Cornes and Davis have been let go.My question is how much of this season was influenced by josh carr?? Was he heavily involved in the tactical side of things?? If so, not a fantastic sign of what’s to come
2007 Port was not a weak list. It's only in hindsight because of the GF performance that we call it that. Geelong at that level would beat most runner ups this century by 10+ goals.How do you know that? Williams got Port further than Ken with a far weaker list than Ken mostly had in 2007. I've never understood this unproven assumption, that's like saying The Crows full potential was achieved under Robert Shaw in 1996.
The Port squad in 2004 was stacked.How do you know that? Williams got Port further than Ken with a far weaker list than Ken mostly had in 2007. I've never understood this unproven assumption, that's like saying The Crows full potential was achieved under Robert Shaw in 1996.
I said 2007, which does not feature half of those players you mentioned. 2007 exceeded all of Hinkley's 13 seasons with a weaker list than most of the lists Ken had. 2020 was far more stacked than 2007 and he still managed to botch it. A better coach would have taken advantage of the lists he had.The Port squad in 2004 was stacked.
Kane and Chad Cornes
Shaun and Peter Burgoyne
Damien Hardwick
Warren Tredrea
Brenton Lade
Gavin Wanganeen
Josh Carr
Dean Brogan
Byron Pickett
Stewie Dew
That side would crush today's Port team.
The 2004 team under Williams was a shit ton better than the 2007 team.I said 2007, which does not feature half of those players you mentioned. 2007 exceeded all of Hinkley's 13 seasons with a weaker list than most of the lists Ken had. 2020 was far more stacked than 2007 and he still managed to botch it. A better coach would have taken advantage of the lists he had.
How do you know that? Williams got Port further than Ken with a far weaker list than Ken mostly had in 2007. I've never understood this unproven assumption, that's like saying The Crows full potential was achieved under Robert Shaw in 1996.
No current season stats available
That has nothing to do with what I'm talking about.The 2004 team under Williams was a shit ton better than the 2007 team.
But that's objectively better getting to a grand final than what Ken did in 13 seasons, because Ken couldn't do it and he had superior line ups than that 2007 inferior squad. My point being Williams was able to manage better than Ken, contrasting your unproven assumption you made that Ken is the best coach ever, when there's far superior coaches out there, who could have taken advantage of those 13 seasons.The 2007 team played their worst game of the year at the GF, against the greatest team of the modern era.
Depends on whether Carr can elevate a shit squad to finals just like Daddy Ken managed regularly.
Carr needs to equally overachieve at Alberton.
BooNow that we know the Power won't win one under Kenny, what's the chances they can win one under Carr?
I think Carr's reign will be a continuance of what was happening under Ken, as I dont think he was the reason the Power wernt winning like some expected them to. I believe Ken got the most out of that squad, and the long term outlook for the squad is not as good as what they had.
We have Boak and Rioli retired, Wines on the way out, and some large list holes, that arnt easy to fix.
Port over the next five years will swing between 8th and 14th place, and I dont think he will get past five years without making a prelim at least.
Port Adelaide living rent free in Cleric's head forever.Now that we know the Power won't win one under Kenny, what's the chances they can win one under Carr?
I think Carr's reign will be a continuance of what was happening under Ken, as I dont think he was the reason the Power wernt winning like some expected them to. I believe Ken got the most out of that squad, and the long term outlook for the squad is not as good as what they had.
We have Boak and Rioli retired, Wines on the way out, and some large list holes, that arnt easy to fix.
Port over the next five years will swing between 8th and 14th place, and I dont think he will get past five years without making a prelim at least.
No current season stats available
Think he has a point. You even see it with fans.
The 'We exist to win premierships' moniker means SFA in the big boys league.
Time to move on from backwater league flags.
Give Carr the mindset to help the club succeed.
Celebrate internally. Sure.So every Victorian club can celebrate their past but we can’t, right
Striving to win the premiership each year is wrong, got itCelebrate internally. Sure.
But it's your club motto, and largely not fit for purpose in the AFL.
That's twice you've arrived at an inaccurate conclusion.Striving to win the premiership each year is wrong, got it
Ahhhh subtext and hidden meanings, wonderful insight.That's twice you've arrived at an inaccurate conclusion.
Who said don't strive for success?
But marketing yourself in such an arrogant manner in a very difficult competition is precisely the clinging to the past Kane is referring to.
The statement 'we exist to win premierships' if taken at its literal meaning is 100% accurate. But we all know there's a sub-text here, a hidden actual meaning.