Remove this Banner Ad

Prediction Changes v Hawthorn

  • Thread starter Thread starter Van_Dyke
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

i want to spew
- fyfe likely in (as long as completes main training fine)
- banfield in for schultz
- watson likely in for young
- treacy and sturt unlikely (cited 2nd ruck concern with treacy, match fitness/minutes for sturt)

if you excuse me, i'm heading off to the melt thread
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

i want to spew
- fyfe likely in (as long as completes main training fine)
- banfield in for schultz
- watson likely in for young
- treacy and sturt unlikely (cited 2nd ruck concern with treacy, match fitness/minutes for sturt)

if you excuse me, i'm heading off to the melt thread
Sounds about right. Two blokes who’ve kicked 12 goals between them in their last outings won’t be able to force their way into our awesome forward line. 🤦🏼‍♂️
 
If Treacy was actually really good what would we do? Could you still pick 2 rucks?

Eg if Pav was coming in this week. We wouldn’t be making Pav play part time ruck.
Anyway sounds like a shitty team on paper is coming


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
i want to spew
- fyfe likely in (as long as completes main training fine)
- banfield in for schultz
- watson likely in for young

- treacy and sturt unlikely (cited 2nd ruck concern with treacy, match fitness/minutes for sturt)

if you excuse me, i'm heading off to the melt thread

Hmm lets make the team worse shall we
 
i want to spew
- fyfe likely in (as long as completes main training fine)
- banfield in for schultz
- watson likely in for young
- treacy and sturt unlikely (cited 2nd ruck concern with treacy, match fitness/minutes for sturt)

if you excuse me, i'm heading off to the melt thread

Far out it’s hard to support this team sometimes.
 
i want to spew
- fyfe likely in (as long as completes main training fine)
- banfield in for schultz
- watson likely in for young
- treacy and sturt unlikely (cited 2nd ruck concern with treacy, match fitness/minutes for sturt)

if you excuse me, i'm heading off to the melt thread
What in the actual f**
 
sounds like boring changes from a boring coach. Hard to get excited when the thinking is so conservative and we have genuine forwards who were drafted to play AFL football, but we're too scared to use them in case worse case scenario occurs even though they're fit and eligible. No wonder we fail so abjectly.

About as excited for this game as having kippers on toast with paint for breakfast
 

Remove this Banner Ad

If Treacy was actually really good what would we do? Could you still pick 2 rucks?

Eg if Pav was coming in this week. We wouldn’t be making Pav play part time ruck.
Anyway sounds like a shitty team on paper is coming


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

who actually cares about the ruck?
Play 1 of them and just lose all the taps for all I care. Back in the mids to win the ball and actually have key forwards
 
Bailey Banfield in, wicked. Super pumped.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Playing Banfield over Sturt and not including an actual key forward is peak Freo..

All good though we’ll just take our dual Brownlow midfielder out of the midfield and stick him in a pocket, throw another ruck in there, and whatever you’d call Banfield, and bang! Forwardline. We’ll take our 4 points now please.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom