Remove this Banner Ad

Changes v WCE

  • Thread starter Thread starter statman87
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

I'm waiting for our injury list to be updated before I list my changes but geez, we've scraped through the barrell and are now tunelling to China.
 
Think thats really positive thinking to think melbourne will jump us. We will beat brisbane anyway I think

They won't. Dogs could if we stay true to form against Brissie! Highest we will finish is 14th though.
 
A 100th game for us then out of the system for Tommy, just in case there is a gun son.
 
It's good to see there is a mass awakening over Logan. Thomas will be next :)

Here's hoping. There are players in worse form than Thomas ATM though, since he just played his good game to keep his spot for another month.

Why don't hardnuts ever get stick for being inconsistent? People whinge about Westhoff only playing a good game every month or so. Thomas has played 2 good games out of 12 this year. And we even have Pearce getting called inconsistent even though he's been regularly getting 25-ish touches a game just because he's an outside player. Public opinion on 'inconsistency' is far more perception than reality IMO.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Because people are stupid. Thes are the same unwashed masses who comoare Brown favourable with Tredrea
 
Add Hartlett to the outs. Been offered a 1 match ban by the MRP

If this is for the Cyril Rioli thing, I ****ing give up. This game is completely gone if a player can be suspended for something that may or may not have happened and wasn't caught on camera.
 
Everyone forgets that the MRP is meant to avoid a tribunal hearing, but nowhere near the same inspection has been used in deciding what the `opt out' penalty will be.

If we were finals bound, we'd challenge it and win, I'm sure.
 
A 100th game for us then out of the system for Tommy, just in case there is a gun son.
It's pretty clear that Logan is being 'Pettigrewed'.
 
How enormously coincidental?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

If Logan isn't delisted at years end we're just not serious.

It's pretty sickening that we're squeezing plasma from a turnip with this guy, yet haven't given Salopek a look-in all year despite him only being 20 or so days older and still potentially having value.
 
It's pretty sickening that we're squeezing plasma from a turnip with this guy, yet haven't given Salopek a look-in all year despite him only being 20 or so days older and still potentially having value.

If Salopek was as durable and fit as Logan, he would've played every game for the past 2 years.
 
It's pretty sickening that we're squeezing plasma from a turnip with this guy, yet haven't given Salopek a look-in all year despite him only being 20 or so days older and still potentially having value.

Salopek has already played a 100 games for the club.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

I'm all for Sal getting games over Thomas and Logan I'm just saying he is stitched up for F/S and Logan isn't. It is the only logical reason Logan has been getting a game.

The other side of it is why would Sal ever recommend the PAFC after the way it has gone for him playing here?
 
So infuriating to see Logan drop that easy chest mark in the last quarter, and there were other memorable moments. To say he's a spud is an insult to spuds.

If only this there possible, but I'd like to see 6 of the best SANFL players, not aligned to either Port or the Crows, to come in for our 6 worst players.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom