Remove this Banner Ad

Opinion Changes vs Richmond

  • Thread starter Thread starter statman87
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

In:
ebert ( deserves a game in good form for the maggies )

If Matt Thomas had a good game in ruck for Norwood would you bring him in for Renouf?

As for Pfeiffer, should never have been selected ahead of Salopek a fortnight ago.
 
OUT: Pfeiffer, Hartlett

Pfeiffer is self explanatory. Hartlett goes out to teach him that he hasn't 'made it'. Gotch was on radio today saying that only one of Hartlett or Pearce would be in the back line because neither of them has a defensive side to their game. Well, how about neither of them there, and play someone who will show the desperation of a player who is on their last life, such as a Salopek or a Logan?

IN: Salopek, Logan
 
OUT: Pfeiffer, Hartlett

Pfeiffer is self explanatory. Hartlett goes out to teach him that he hasn't 'made it'. Gotch was on radio today saying that only one of Hartlett or Pearce would be in the back line because neither of them has a defensive side to their game. Well, how about neither of them there, and play someone who will show the desperation of a player who is on their last life, such as a Salopek or a Logan?

IN: Salopek, Logan

Logan's got to play in defence now, surely?

Four consecutive losses means more than 1-2 tinkering changes this week.

Logan, Salopek, Redden, Daniel Stewart, Hitchcock should all be considered.

Take your pick as to who goes out. I'd certainly be happy to see the back of the captain who continues to drag us down to his level of mediocrity.

I can't accept playing anyone on the park who can't defend, let alone picking those players to line up in our backline.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

What exactly is Cassisi bringing to the team right now? Can't kick, doesn't get any ball and you can't inspire your troops if you can't walk the walk. Not a part of our future IMO. Get tough and get serious, I'd rather Thomas over Cassisi- at least he hunts the man.
 
Yeah, let's drop the guy who's had 55 touches the last two weeks for 'whoever'.

You need to get over Boak ****ing your girlfriend.

lol why you mad bro??



overated...

boak fumbled his way to and ordinary 20 odd possesion game...

his kicking is shocking pie floaters all the way..
 
I love how people are ready to write off a first game sub whose introduction to the game coincided with our come back...

Out: Renouf
In: Anyone who can ruck, run and maybe take a Brogan like mark behind the play.
 
pstew2dstew said:
lol why you mad bro??

Because you think a guy who's had 55 touches in the last two weeks should be dropped for 'whoever'. I thought I made that clear.
 
Renoufs problem today was he was exhausted and from what I remember he didn't have much of a preseason. Get two ruck men in not Renouf plus a backman/forward.
If Rodan is going to play, make him the sub, if he's only good for one quarter of football, make it official.
 
Renouf competed quite well but was simply not as good as Jacobs. When you lose the ruck and the opposition have the three best mids on the ground and the best forward, it makes a three goal loss seem reasonable and quite fortunate actually.

Renouf needs to be our second ruckman, or alternatively we just need to play Lobbe and Redden.
 
Because you think a guy who's had 55 touches in the last two weeks should be dropped for 'whoever'. I thought I made that clear.

oh i am sorry excuse me for my opinion not coinciding with yours...

your right lets keep him in if thats the standard of a great or good game that we need week in and week out from our mids and make all of our youngsters our whipping boys when they make mistakes.


:rolleyes:
 

Remove this Banner Ad

pstew2dstew said:
oh i am sorry excuse me for my opinion not coinciding with yours

It's not that it doesn't coincide with mine, it's that it's one of the dumbest ****ing things I've ever heard and that you're letting the agenda you've had for years against Boak for some reason cloud your judgment and cause you to suggest utterly ridiculous things.
 
I wish Jasper Pittard wasn't injured. Our playing group needs to grow a heart
 
The first change I would make would be Heartlett out of the back lines forever. Stop tring to turn him into a Brice F#####g Gibbs. Our midfield is screaming out for class so f#####g use him. And the call to use our best tall defender in the tuck was awful. The option of using Hitchcock on someone's shoulder that was suggested a few weeks back is starting to look appealing.
 
Renouf competed quite well but was simply not as good as Jacobs. When you lose the ruck and the opposition have the three best mids on the ground and the best forward, it makes a three goal loss seem reasonable and quite fortunate actually.

Renouf needs to be our second ruckman, or alternatively we just need to play Lobbe and Redden.

Lobbe and Redden thanks. Renouf REALLY labored around the ground today, driving home just how average he really is. When all are fit he has to be third choice behind Redden and Lobbe.....both played together in the same team.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.


Because he's had 55 touches (23 contested) in the last two weeks, with 5 goal assists to go with it, and you're suggesting we should drop him for some spud like Simon Phillips or something. If you can't see what's wrong with that then you should really stop posting on a footy forum.
 
OUT: Hartlett (he's a bloody good player that needs to be kept on edge and know that everyone has high expectations for him. Could be like Pearce like year who returned after being dropped to be one of our better and consistent players Also, remember he is in the leadership group), Schulz if injured. Renouf if Schulz not injured.
IN: Logan or Salopekfor Hartlett. Redden. If Schulz is injured, play 2 ruckmen with Renouf resting forward.

Pfieffer gets one last crack for now.

Hope Rodan starts as sub next week, or he'd be another out for either Phillips or Hitchcock.
 
i am sick of people giving boydman a hardtime..he speaks the truth..our season is shot. Our midfield is deplorable.Did we win a stoppage today? no need to tank but keep playing youth, we are going to win 5-6 games this year at best anyway.Get pick 4 next year a draft a quality midfielder.
 
Because he's had 55 touches (23 contested) in the last two weeks, with 5 goal assists to go with it, and you're suggesting we should drop him for some spud like Simon Phillips or something. If you can't see what's wrong with that then you should really stop posting on a footy forum.
seriously gopower you dont own these forums and i dont need your permission to post on here

i see what dangerfield and sloane (boaks opponent) did to us today and laugh

but like said gp lets just keep whipping our usaul suspects and tolerate boaks sub standard perfomances because he wins so many games for us or turns amatch for us
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom