Remove this Banner Ad

Chapman or Davey?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Drummond
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Bias opinion says Chapman.

Non bias opinion thinks of it as this:

Chapman does more of the hard work, does the team-work sets up the play and is regulary in Geelongs best.

Davey is good but does the more flashy things and because of that i think he will get most of the votes.

I don't think Davey is consistant enough. Chapman does the more gritty things. So i'll say chapman.
 
Davey - Able to get goals where nearly all others couldn't. Taking nothing away from Chapman though, supurb player, I'd just rather Davey in my team but ofcourse...I do go for Melbourne.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Chapman easily. Davey is great however and I'd grab him in a flash.
 
Davey..............Easily


Chapman is a good player but not quite the match winner that Davey has become
 
i think in a couple of years davey will be up there with the best, he is seriously improving imo every game...and get this hes only played 49 games
 
While I think Chapman has been fantastic this year, I'd still take Davey. His defensive pressure, match winning ability, and inspiration are right up on par with anyone in the league currently.
 
Both are having awesome years, Chapman especially.
Hard to split them, had to go Davey as I believe he is still improving from game to game.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Chapman.

Every side would love Davey but Chappy is a deadset gun.

Hard as the come, smart, skilled.
 
Chapman is a good player...yes. However, anyone who would choose Chapman over Davey is either bias or knows little about football. Davey offers far more today and in the future.

Seriously people...
 
RedLegs#5 said:
Chapman is a good player...yes. However, anyone who would choose Chapman over Davey is either bias or knows little about football. Davey offers far more today and in the future.

Seriously people...
That is the most biased post I have ever read. And here you are telling others are biased, oh my. :o
 
RedLegs#5 said:
Chapman is a good player...yes. However, anyone who would choose Chapman over Davey is either bias or knows little about football. Davey offers far more today and in the future.

Seriously people...

Coming from a Melbourne supporter... :rolleyes: no bias.
 
RedLegs#5 said:
Chapman is a good player...yes. However, anyone who would choose Chapman over Davey is either bias or knows little about football. Davey offers far more today and in the future.

Seriously people...

Oh these Melbourne supporters are a funny bunch
rofl5.gif
 
Chapman by a mile.

Plays legitimate midfield better than Davey, and seems more capable of applying physical pressure - Not just tackling, but bumps and such.

Seriously, Davey is the only small forward who can kick two goals and get called a star by everyone in the media.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

vinnie_vegas69 said:
Chapman by a mile.

Plays legitimate midfield better than Davey, and seems more capable of applying physical pressure - Not just tackling, but bumps and such.

Seriously, Davey is the only small forward who can kick two goals and get called a star by everyone in the media.

Perhaps watch Davey...then comment.

Don't be so spiteful and jealous.
 
RedLegs#5 said:
Chapman is a good player...yes. However, anyone who would choose Chapman over Davey is either bias or knows little about football. Davey offers far more today and in the future.

Seriously people...
Says who? Davey will get the more snazzy goals but Chapman does the hard work.
 
RedLegs#5 said:
Chapman is a good player...yes. However, anyone who would choose Chapman over Davey is either bias or knows little about football. Davey offers far more today and in the future.

Seriously people...

View Poll Results: Who would you take?
Chapman 36 60.00%
Davey 24 40.00%
Voters: 60. You have already voted on this poll
 
Before this year I would have said Chapman easily, now, I still say Chapman, but I like what I'm seeing with Davey. He's not just a goal sneak, he's playing up the ground far more, averaging over 16 possessions a game, as well as 2 goals. Combine that with his defensive pressure and ability to set teammates up with goals by magical vision and deft touches, and it's an exciting package.

Having said that, I'd not trade Davey for Chapman. Like most supporters, I struggle with letting go our better players, even for a seemingly positive trade.

Btw, I couldn't bring myself to vote in this poll :D
 
RedLegs#5 said:
Chapman is a good player...yes. However, anyone who would choose Chapman over Davey is either bias or knows little about football. Davey offers far more today and in the future.

Seriously people...

:D :D :D

Chapman offers more consistency and more toughness...

Don't patronise me...
 
cats2rise said:
I don't think Davey is consistant enough. Chapman does the more gritty things. So i'll say chapman.

chapmanmagic35 said:
:D :D :D

Chapman offers more consistency and more toughness...

Don't patronise me...
Why do people classify Davey as inconsistent?

His last 11 games:
22 touches, 2 goals
15 touches, 2 goals
19 touches, 3 goals
11 touches, 2 goals
18 touches, 1 goal
9 touches, 1 goal
19 touches, 3 goals
10 touches, 1 goal
15 touches, 1 goal
16 touches, 1 goal

That is ultra consistent if you ask me, especially considering his role in the team.

And he's no Glenn Archer but he's hardly soft either. Last year he led the Demons in tackles at 70kg.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom