Remove this Banner Ad

Chris Judd eye gauging Michael Rischitelli

  • Thread starter Thread starter dxdoan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
byron_clanger said:
yeah, it wouldn't have to do with the fact there's a photo with his finger in his eye, moron
Click to expand...

You must mean your eye?

Explains why you are crying or could it be that you miss your ex-champion LOL

cry-me-a-river-72.jpg






spacer.gif
 
Doesnt look good. Didn't really see why he needed to do it.Will be relying on evidence from Rischitelli ala Campbell Brown to get him off.
 
RoJo Junior said:
Hes in big trouble i think. He wasnt even remotely in that contest to begin with, and he just happened to wander over and touch up Rischitelli's face while he was defenceless to block as he had a Carlton player wrapped up in a tackle. Quite odd thing to do and worthy of a couple of weeks i would've thought. Much worse than the incident with Campbell Brown.
Click to expand...

You got it in one word - that is all he did. He may have been thinking evil thoughts but that is all he did

Jisha said:
This is why I love Carlton supporters.
Click to expand...

Not as much as we love you Easybeats

jonesy86 said:
You can't really argue he was pushing his head/face as it's quite clear the palm of his hand was elevated and his fingers were going to work all over his face.
Click to expand...

LOL make sure you come back and apologize when it gets thrown out
 
qldbluesman_43 said:
Because it's such a weird event wouldn't they have to get Rischitelli to at least say yes he eye gauged me? You can't actually truly tell what happened.

I would think for something like this to suspend him they would need Rischitelli to say yes he touched my eye because if he doesn't then the evidence is that Judd moved his hand towards Rischitelli's face and may or may not have done something.
Click to expand...

I think the report has been changed from 'eye gouging' to 'misconduct - making unnecessary contact with face/eyes'. I'm not 100% sure on that but I think that's the case now with the new MRP system.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Five said:
You got it in one word - that is all he did. He may have been thinking evil thoughts but that is all he did
Click to expand...

Regardless if it was "minimal impact" the intentions and the fact that eye gouging is classed as one of the lowest acts in the game will not hold him in good stead. He wasn't even in that contest to begin with and he well and truly overreacted to the argy bargy between him and Rischitelli all night.

Judd clearly wasn't pushing down on his face, and Rischitelli merely grabbed Judd's jumper in retaliation not anything else.
 
RoJo Junior said:
Regardless if it was "minimal impact" the intentions and the fact that eye gouging is classed as one of the lowest acts in the game will not hold him in good stead. He wasn't even in that contest to begin with and he well and truly overreacted to the argy bargy between him and Rischitelli all night.

Judd clearly wasn't pushing down on his face, and Rischitelli merely grabbed Judd's jumper in retaliation not anything else.
Click to expand...


He touched his face - may get a warning

I repeat there was NO IMPACT
There was NO GOUGE

Give us a lecture on kicking if you like - you may as well as because you are exagerating what everybody has seen/not seen

You can come back and correct me if I am wrong :)

ps You don't miss him much LOL
 
Five said:
He touched his face - may get a warning

I repeat there was NO IMPACT
There was NO GOUGE



You can come back and correct me if I am wrong :)


:mad:

You are wrong .

Go to post 72 ..redwallis .....in this thread and watch Judd work over his opponents eyes and face
Click to expand...
 
a_fighting_fury said:
Yes.
Yes.
And unfortunately Yes again.

When I saw it I didnt think much od it as there was very little reaction from Rischitelli, so the MRP may dismiss it on those grounds. But I must admit it's something I never never expected to see from the Juddmeister! He's one of my fav AFL players. :confused:
Click to expand...

An opposition player's under -reaction (Rischitelli) or over reaction (Campbell Brown the other week) should have no bearing on the outcome. It is akin to blaming the victim - as is making up "evidence" about Rischitelli grabbing Judd by the balls.

A number of Carlton supporters seem to be able to see the event for what it is - but some of the rest of you guys need to open the other eye - as some of the excuses made up here are laughable and dont even deserve a reply.

"The Juddster" will be judged by his actions, regardless of the jumper he wears
 
Forrest Gump said:
An opposition player's under -reaction (Rischitelli) or over reaction (Campbell Brown the other week) should have no bearing on the outcome. It is akin to blaming the victim - as is making up "evidence" about Rischitelli grabbing Judd by the balls.

A number of Carlton supporters seem to be able to see the event for what it is - but some of the rest of you guys need to open the other eye - as some of the excuses made up here are laughable and dont even deserve a reply.

"The Juddster" will be judged by his actions, regardless of the jumper he wears
Click to expand...

I am not saying what Juddy did was saintly but let's stick to the facts as that is how it will be judged

Can anyone say with certainty that his finger went in his eye not under it?

Does anyone see a reaction (impulse touch of the eye) by Rischi?

Does anyone think the finger in question was not his little finger of his left hand?

I think these questions are all valid. Like I said - I am not saying he was saintly but I think there is as much evidence of him putting his thumb up his nose as there is of him eye gouging

I repeat - I think he will be warned for touching his face.

If I am wrong I will come back and apologize
 
I LOVE THE CFC said:
This will be my last ever post on BF (like anyone cares ;) and it has nothing to do with the lead we coughed up) What Chris Judd did tonight is so low and if you are real human and seen where the ball was and where his fingers went you would come to realise what a dirty act that was. I am as passionate as the next man and have remained loyal and faithful through-out all our dark times but when I saw that, that was the end! I respect Judd as a great footballer and I will continue to buy a CFC membership and I know we are on the right track but I just cannot except that from someone that not only has prior history but is the leader of the club I love so much.

So say what you want and call me anything but if you think there is nothing in it, you are deluding yourself as far as I'm concered.


Goodbye Big Footy ---- R.I.P I LOVE THE CFC 6.9.09



:mad::(:eek::rolleyes::confused:


Thanks for the memories :thumbsu:
Click to expand...

Overreaction of the century. I could imagine someone making a post like this after the rape news or salary cap issues or even the tanking but this?

What Judd did was strange and silly, but I'm not sure if he deserves time on the sidelines for just rubbing someones face. If he got a week I could live with it. Bit stupid to think it wouldn't get caught by the cameras though.
 
Five said:
I am not saying what Juddy did was saintly but let's stick to the facts as that is how it will be judged

Can anyone say with certainty that his finger went in his eye not under it?

Does anyone see a reaction (impulse touch of the eye) by Rischi?

Does anyone think the finger in question was not his little finger of his left hand?

I think these questions are all valid. Like I said - I am not saying he was saintly but I think there is as much evidence of him putting his thumb up his nose as there is of him eye gouging

I repeat - I think he will be warned for touching his face.

If I am wrong I will come back and apologize
Click to expand...

If you want to stick to facts, then you might want to read the rules.

For a start, the burden of proof is not certainty. It isnt even "beyond reasonable doubt". It is determined on the balance of probabilities.

Also, under the misconduct rules, his fingers do not have to be in his eyes in order for him to be suspended anyway.

Your "think he will be warned" is more a hope - and certainly not a "fact"

The facts are the footage - and from that alone, it doesnt look good for the Juddster.

I can see that you are trying to be objective, but you probably need to keep trying... ;)
 
Chrissie90 said:
If you want to stick to facts, then you might want to read the rules.

For a start, the burden of proof is not certainty. It isnt even "beyond reasonable doubt". It is determined on the balance of probabilities.

Also, under the misconduct rules, his fingers do not have to be in his eyes in order for him to be suspended anyway.

Your "think he will be warned" is more a hope - and certainly not a "fact"

The facts are the footage - and from that alone, it doesnt look good for the Juddster.

I can see that you are trying to be objective, but you probably need to keep trying... ;)
Click to expand...

Where did I say that it was a fact

Dispute any of the 3 facts I listed - the basis of which I made my no suspension conclusion

I don't need to keep trying because you have not told me anything I did not already know and built into my summary

Maybe there is some way we can have a little wager on it through betfair ie if you think it is a fact that he will be suspended ;)
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Five said:
Where did I say that it was a fact

Dispute any of the 3 facts I listed - the basis of which I made my no suspension conclusion

I don't need to keep trying because you have not told me anything I did not already know and built into my summary

Maybe there is some way we can have a little wager on it through betfair ie if you think it is a fact that he will be suspended ;)
Click to expand...
Judd was just on fox sports news admitting that he was pressing his thumb into a pressure point behind Rischetell's ear, said there was no contact to the eyes and was confident that he would play in round 1.

Not sure why you would admit to even doing that on national tv but thats Judd i suppose.
 
I haven't seen the incident as I was at the game last night but talking to some of the Carlton boys this morning, they are all saying he will be gone unfortunately.
 
Bit strange. Judd actually was pushing him behind his ear trying to get him to release a tackle on a Carlton player. If you watch the footage closely, his finger clearly NEVER makes contact with the eyes (sorry to disappoint bitter anti-Carlton supporters). Closest was about 2-3 cm after the player turned his head (see below)

picture1ck.png


Can you get suspended for pushing on someone's ear? :)
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Just Kreuzing said:
Judd was just on fox sports news admitting that he was pressing his thumb into a pressure point behind Rischetell's ear, said there was no contact to the eyes and was confident that he would play in round 1.

Not sure why you would admit to even doing that on national tv but thats Judd i suppose.
Click to expand...

Well if that is the case - I think he is feeling very guilty about 'nearly' making eye contact because I cannot see how that story makes any sense as I cannot see that his thumb is anywhere near behind his ear :confused:
 
He was pushing his thumb in the pressure point under Rischitelli's earlobe? That is still pretty dirty. Someone of his calibre shouldn't have to resort to stuff like that.

Regardless of the above "proof", in the video his fingers are in the eyes as well as pressing behind the earlobe.
 
When I saw the incident last night it didn't look as if his fingers were in his eyes. But you still have to worry about what he was actually doing. It doesn't look good either way.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Similar threads

jj1978
    • Like
News Welcome to Carlton Chris Davies General Manager of Football
2 3 4 5 6
Replies
131
Views
11K
GoBlues!
GoBlues!
Neese
    • Like
    • Love
Merry Christmas Big Footy family
Replies
2
Views
587
Neese
Neese

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom