Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
F/D said:Yes and no.
Bell = Great man cometh
Clarke = Great women departeth.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
What has Bell done to impress you? I'm not defending Clarke or anything but seriously what the hell has he done?F/D said:Yes and no.
Bell = Great man cometh
Clarke = Great women departeth.
embleygirl said:What has Bell done to impress you? I'm not defending Clarke or anything but seriously what the hell has he done?
Who is Clarke playing for these days? NSW i think? Is he still playing for his state or what?Coughlan said:What has Ian Bell done, he has cheated in his last match, and beat up on Bangladesh. Fantastic
Michael Clarke, scored 151 on debut in India, won the Alan Border Medal amd sh*ts on Bell.
Clarke= future star going through a rough patch
Bell= cheating Pommy ****************, with no future except against Bangladesh and Zimbabwe
in summary Clarke>>>>>>>>>>>>Bell
When we see that line, we realise you are either taking the p*** or you are a complete madman.eddiesmith said:A fairer comparison would be
Trescothick > Hayden
Strauss > Langer
Vaughan > Ponting
Bell <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< Hodge
Pietersen >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hussey
Flintoff >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Symonds
G.Jones > Gilchrist
Giles <<< Warne
S.Jones > Lee
Hoggard > MacGill
Harmison > McGrath
9-2 Englands way
No where near as bad as saying Jones is better than Gilchrist.eddiesmith said:More realistic than some other comparisons
Geez, Australia wins 7-3 on 1 comparison yet we kicked Australias ass in the Ashes?
Pietersen ********s on Hussey, ******** domestic records. Husseys Australian domestic record is nothing spectacular
Tait > Hoggard? Oh go and get ********ed
Difference, mine was obviously a joke, he was seriousboof said:No where near as bad as saying Jones is better than Gilchrist.
pluga_4 said:just a side note, but currently australia have 5 batsmen that average over 50 in test cricket : ponting, hayden, gilchrist, hussey and hodge.
england have none.
now thats music to my ears![]()
would like to hear eddie's thoughts or should i say excuses on this one![]()
F/D said:Trescothick < Hayden
Strauss > Langer
Vaughan < Ponting
Bell > Clarke
Pieterson > Hodge
Flintoff > Symonds
Jones < Gilly
Giles < Warne
Jones > Lee
Hoggard > MacGill
Harmison < McGrath
6-5 Englands way![]()
Another blind and biased AussieBennycoff said:haha ur joking right?
Trescothick < Hayden
Strauss < Langer
Vaughan < Ponting
Bell < Hussey
Pieterson < Hodge
Flintoff > Symonds
Jones < Gilly
Giles < Warne
Jones > Lee
Hoggard < MacGill
Harmison < McGrath
thats about 9-2![]()
With ease, was it? We belted you in one game and you beat us by about 4 wickets chasing 130 odd in the next, and then the second test match had about 3 runs in it. Therefore, both your victories could have gone either way. I would hardly say you won with ease. You were a one series wonder and are being shown up in Pakistan at the moment where you have lost the series with ease.eddiesmith said:Another blind and biased Aussie
Funny how our side is so much ********ter yet we still beat Australia with ease
ease? you are kidding urself arent you. bwhahahahaha. 2-1, your 2 wins were of the minimum.eddiesmith said:Another blind and biased Aussie
Funny how our side is so much ********ter yet we still beat Australia with ease
MacGill, Bracken and Symonds wont worry EnglandBennycoff said:ease? you are kidding urself arent you. bwhahahahaha. 2-1, your 2 wins were of the minimum.
look at the changes mate. IN: MacGill, Hussey, Hodge, Bracken, Symonds; OUT: Kasprowicz, Gillespie, Clarke, Katich, Martyn.
You are a fool if you think the Aussies are declining. England in that time have brought in a dud spinner - Udal, 36 yrs and can't even get wkts in Pakistan...oh dear. Giles - how does he get a game? And Collingwood in your squad and first test sidenot to mention Bell getting a regular game. Wake up and smell the roses eddie my friend.
![]()
boof said:With ease, was it? We belted you in one game and you beat us by about 4 wickets chasing 130 odd in the next, and then the second test match had about 3 runs in it. Therefore, both your victories could have gone either way. I would hardly say you won with ease. You were a one series wonder and are being shown up in Pakistan at the moment where you have lost the series with ease.
We'll see mate, if you can't handle Pakistan, there's no hope you'll handle the Aussies attack next summer.eddiesmith said:MacGill, Bracken and Symonds wont worry England
Oh no, Australia is improving, their only 2 bowlers are in their mid 30's but improving![]()
then the use of the word 'ease' was wrong wasnt it eddieeddiesmith said:In the last 4 matches at no point did I ever think we would lose
I dont give a ******** if you win a test by 2 runs or an innings, a win is a win and we have the Ashes
Bennycoff said:We'll see mate, if you can't handle Pakistan, there's no hope you'll handle the Aussies attack next summer.
Oh yeah - Pieterson - can't hack it in the sub continent![]()
eddiesmith said:a win is a win
eddiesmith said:untill they got lucky last year
How do you know they never will be? What if some guy turns up and gets a double century each game, and another turns up and gets about three wickets per over? They could be as good as Australia one day, just they aren't atm.Bennycoff said:hang on eddie, we beat the paki's the last two series over there and we beat sri lanka and beat india so shut up mate, cos england have done nothing compared to us. you've got nothing mate, so just agree that england arent and never will be as good as the aussies.