Remove this Banner Ad

Solved Corby to be paroled?

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Story goes that the Corbys have been doing this for years, and they usually leave a bribe inside the boogie board for the customs officer to take and wave them through. I've heard around the traps (who knows) that this was the the first and only time that the brother accompanied the sisters on one of their "pot runs" and swiped the cash for himself. Upon seeing no bribe, customs got aggrieved and pinched them for smuggling. Schapelle copped the whack because she admitted it was her boogie board
But yeah.......guilty as hell.
 
the truth will come out in the end. i just don't believe they would have known there was that much pot in their luggage

3.5 kg's wasn't it.

Pretty much everyone, (unless it's already a very heavy bag and/or you're a muscleman) would notice if your bag was suddenly 3.5 kg heavier.

Guilty as hell.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Why don't you people actually think? Maybe because your media have been feeding you with smears for so many years, and you just buy it. Sorry, but it is somewhat sickening to watch your indifference to suffering here, as it is to anyone who has bothered to read a few facts.

Try these, as NOT reported by your vile censoring media:

1. Schapelle Corby's boogie-board bag was the only one not scanned at Sydney Airport: it was diverted past the scanner by baggage staff. Customs Minister Ellison withheld this life critical information, even when Schapelle Corby’s lawyer asked directly about scanning. [Transit Report]​
2. This information was also hidden from Parliament, when direct questions were asked, and critically, it was withheld from the Bali court. John Howard, and his long term colleague, Head of Sydney Airport Corporation Ltd, Max Moore-Wilton, were also aware, but remained silent. [Transit Report]​
3. The AFP never investigated the reason for this missing screening data, and AFP Commissioner Keelty, who was also informed, never commented upon it. Keelty was also aware, via Operation Mocha, that the same baggage handlers were simultaneously engaging in other drug related activities. [Transit Report]​
4. Schapelle Corby checked her bags in underweight, but they were subsequently found to be 5kg overweight on the Qantas system (which would have carried an excess charge of $175). This clearly indicated the addition of a significant weight factor, after the bags left her hands. [Transit Report]​
5. Again, neither Schapelle Corby, nor the Bali court, were ever provided with this critical information. [Supplementary Report]​
6. Two weeks before the verdict, AFP Commissioner Keelty told the media that there was no evidence of airport drug syndicates using innocent passengers, when this was clearly, demonstrably, and utterly, false. The AFP had held the Kessing Reports for months, and it withheld a host of other vital support evidence, which proved the long term and systemic nature of such syndication at Sydney Airport. [Transit Report]​
7. The AFP and DFAT demonstrably evaded and frustrated the forensic and DNA tests which Schapelle Corby begged for in court. [Mutual Evasion Report]​
8. The AFP told Parliament that it couldn't perform marijuana pollen tests, when it had the capacity to do so, and indeed, had originally offered to perform them for the INP. It also refused the services of a forensics expert, who had volunteered to perform them. [Mutual Evasion Report]​
9. Ellison subsequently told a clearly false story about marijuana testing, in a written letter to a constituent. [Mutual Evasion Report]​
10. DFAT did not invoke the MACMA treaty to obtain the sample of marijuana (for DNA testing) which Schapelle Corby begged for, when it could have done so within the provisions of the treaty itself. [Mutual Evasion Report]​
11. The AFP and Qantas provided wholly contradictory stories about the missing CCTV footage, which Schapelle Corby pleaded for. No footage was ever provided, from any airport, despite over 800 cameras being in situ. [Transit Report]​
12. Foreign Minister Downer, and Prime Minister Howard, publicly endorsed the original Bali trial, when they were well aware that a multitude of legal and human rights abuses had been committed throughout. [Bali Trial Report]​
13. Ellison publicly endorsed the burning of the physical evidence, whilst Schapelle Corby pleaded desperately for it to be preserved and tested. [Mutual Evasion Report]​
14. DFAT have, de facto, endorsed and suppressed the ongoing and documented abuses of a mentally ill Australian citizen for more than nine years. [Health Report]​
15. ACLEI, when forced to examine the AFP's role in the affair, was directly and demonstrably complicit with an AFP officer, in producing a report which was an utter embarrassment to all parties. A functionary, who was at the heart of the Howard regime when the AFP abuses occurred, was allowed to rubber stamp ACLEI's complicit rubber stamp. [Whitewash Report]​
16. The government pressed and forced an Australian QC, Mark Trowell, on to Schapelle Corby for her appeal. He then decimated the appeal by attacking her defence team to the media. When he subsequently admitted that he was working for the government, and not for Schapelle Corby, the government refused to comment. The precise role of Justice & Customs Minister Ellison in this affair, Trowell’s long term friend, has never been explained. [Insider Report]​
17. Downer and Howard publicly described a standard flour hoax at the Indonesian embassy as a “murderous attack”, using a “biological agent”, when there was no evidence whatsoever to suggest that it wasn’t benign. Neither of them revealed that the note included with the flour didn't refer to Schapelle Corby at all, and was written in Bahasa, when they promptly blamed it on her supporters. [PowderGate Report]​
18. Ellison did not alert any of the parties necessary to prevent the false, but support-wrecking, story from circulating around the world. Yet, he was informed of the benign nature of the flour, by email, at 6:35pm on the same day. [PowderGate Report]​
19. The government seized Schapelle Corby's book royalties under proceeds of crime legislation, whilst she was still in legal process in Indonesia, sending a clear signal to Jakarta. It further brought the judiciary into disrepute, by illegally extending its jurisdiction outside Australian borders, and holding secret trials, at which Schapelle Corby was not even represented. [Political Seizure Report]​
20. The government thus denied her the funds for a further appeal, and for on-going medication, despite full knowledge of the nature of the original trial, and of the vital primary evidence which had been wilfully withheld. [Political Seizure Report]​
21. Dozens of breaches of the Freedom of Information Act, with respect to requests made on behalf of Schapelle Corby, have been recorded. The AFP alone has spent in the region of $1 million in frustrating efforts to obtain further evidential information. [FOI Abuse Report]​
22. The AFP suppressed a secret recording of two known criminals discussing the collection of marijuana from Sydney Airport on the same day that Schapelle Corby flew to Bali. [Candidate Sources Report]​
23. The Commonwealth Ombudsman has supported the government with respect to every complaint ever lodged relating to Schapelle Corby by members of the public. The same applies to the ACMA, the OAIC, and every other quango presented to the public as a ‘watchdog’. [Quango Report]​
24. . Serious media abuses, including direct criminal matters, such as phone hacking and illegal recording, were submitted to the Finkelstein media inquiry in 2011, but were excluded. Compelling evidence of political interference with respect to the ABC, and of subsequent editorial and reporting abuses, continues to be ignored. [Media Reports]​
25. The Attorney-General refused to accept a formal Crime Report, including a 450 page evidential Addendum, which documented serious breaches of the law by politicians and the AFP. [Crime Report].​

No doubt that will be too much for you to bite on, so watch the documentary here:
www.expendable.tv

You probably won't like the hostility of my words, but this is the real deal. Your cowardly corrupt government held the proof of her innocence all along, and suppressed it to protect the newly privatised airport, nicely set up under John Howard's buddy Max Moore-Wilton.

Australia, eh?

Then they smear her family, using her dead father (dead men can't sue) and a half-relation she hasn't net in a decade, and you guys are on places like this abusing her.

They must be laughing their socks off at you. Enjoy your next beer....

Sickening.
 
In case you want to see, with your own eyes, what creatures your own politicians are:
http://www.expendable.tv/p/expendable-dossier.html

Go on, read the words of the brave Mr Keelty, and Ellison and Howard. Read, instead of re-producing what the most corrupt media on earth have fed to you.

As stated above, one day the truth WILL emerge, and the world will see your nation for what it is. Rather like the UN are doing right now:
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B7MjwfM7HGBgS2dEWnpFZDBBX0U/edit
... as submitted by citizens across 51 nations.
 
i thought you can't profit from a crime in this country any more


The only crime was by committed by Canberra. But if you want to talk about proceeds of crime, how about your criminal politicians seizing Schapelle Corby's book royalties... wait for it... WHILST SHE WAS STILL IN LEGAL PROCESS IN INDONESIA. That's right, a direct signal to Jakarta, to bury her.

That's the Australian way is it? Proud of it?

I should add that this political theft of the money she needed for a second appeal was conducted in a closed secret court, at which she wasn't even represented.

Is that also the Australian way?

Open your eyes.

Ref: The Political Seizure Report: http://www.expendable.tv/2011/10/political-seizure-report.html


PS: For the guy above on the weight of the bag, she didn't pick it up in Bali at all. It was on the bench when she was called over. Stop consuming the myths and misinformation you are purposely being fed.
 
Your cowardly corrupt government held the proof of her innocence all along, and suppressed it to protect the newly privatised airport, nicely set up under John Howard's buddy Max Moore-Wilton.

So you believe that was the cause of it all? They just wanted to protect the airport?
 
So you believe that was the cause of it all? They just wanted to protect the airport?


More complex than that, but as with all political issues, it requires understanding of background. In this case, Howard had only two years earlier privatized the airport, handing the keys to his close buddy Moore-Wilton. It was hugely controversial, with allegations of nepotism, and various security issues, due to the entrenchment of corrupt staff (MANY of them).

All this is well documented. The last thing Ellison and Howard needed was for focus on this politically dynamic shambles. Equally with respect to the US: just 3 years post-911, Australia was horribly exposed.

Then there were the financial interests in Indonesia (by Liberals), and the delicate international relationship, a strategic one.

Most of this is described here:
http://www.expendable.tv/p/introduction.html

And in the film itself on the front page.

Bottom line: your cowardly politicians didn't give a hoot about an innocent citizen. They took the political route, and the media did the rest, by sedating a largely ignorant population.

Everyone wins all the way, apart from the victim and her vilified family. All the material on the Expendable Project's website, which constitutes evidential proof, is totally unreported in Australia. On this censorship, you may want to read this reporton the scale of Australian censorship on the case, by a foreign news agency:
http://www.mathaba.net/news/?x=633694

What your nation is doing to this already destroyed woman sickens people across the world.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

That's what forums are for: divergent opinions. I'll read over the material tonight.
 
Story goes that the Corbys have been doing this for years, and they usually leave a bribe inside the boogie board for the customs officer to take and wave them through. I've heard around the traps (who knows) that this was the the first and only time that the brother accompanied the sisters on one of their "pot runs" and swiped the cash for himself. Upon seeing no bribe, customs got aggrieved and pinched them for smuggling. Schapelle copped the whack because she admitted it was her boogie board
But yeah.......guilty as hell.


Yes, guilty as hell, she was knowingly involved in an illegal enterprise and got caught, you take the risks, you deal with the consequences. The possibility that they botched the bribe doesn't make her any less guilty.
 
More complex than that, but as with all political issues, it requires understanding of background. In this case, Howard had only two years earlier privatized the airport, handing the keys to his close buddy Moore-Wilton. It was hugely controversial, with allegations of nepotism, and various security issues, due to the entrenchment of corrupt staff (MANY of them).

All this is well documented. The last thing Ellison and Howard needed was for focus on this politically dynamic shambles. Equally with respect to the US: just 3 years post-911, Australia was horribly exposed.

Then there were the financial interests in Indonesia (by Liberals), and the delicate international relationship, a strategic one.

Most of this is described here:
http://www.expendable.tv/p/introduction.html

And in the film itself on the front page.

Bottom line: your cowardly politicians didn't give a hoot about an innocent citizen. They took the political route, and the media did the rest, by sedating a largely ignorant population.

Everyone wins all the way, apart from the victim and her vilified family. All the material on the Expendable Project's website, which constitutes evidential proof, is totally unreported in Australia. On this censorship, you may want to read this reporton the scale of Australian censorship on the case, by a foreign news agency:
http://www.mathaba.net/news/?x=633694

What your nation is doing to this already destroyed woman sickens people across the world.


There are some interesting points on this site and many of them are worth discussing.

One thing however is the crime board tries not to be a political zone, this is not to say political pressure cannot be discussed if it is documented but due to the nature of the boards intent we don't want to see a slanging match between right/left etc.

So yes this means we take a higher standard of requesting referenced materiel to continue that part of the discussion. on the website you provided John in it's Library does it specifically have any material in relation to the protection of the airport from political dealings.

If it does not I'm requesting this thread at this point does not go down that road. This does not mean there are many salient facts presented in that site that should be discussed that are relevant to Corby's guilt/innocence or any where in between in proving it.

The first of which is intriguing to me and I don't know is the availability of locally grown marijuana in Bali and how much it costs.

If the claims in this site are correct that it is very cheap and it's inference prevalent than what would be the motive to ship in 4 kilo's of the Australian product in through air travel.

Has anyone any referenced material or ahhmam "knowledge" of this in Bali/Indonesia.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

No he didn't, which is why I said "if".


Than it was a strange thing for you to bring up in the thread than to leave the last word in your post to describe him as a sook. It was an inference made by you that could imply to other readers that he had.

Thats a game that could go on for ever, It was irrelevant to the discussion and you were focusing the issue on the person making the posts and not what they had to say.

I've seen your work on BF and know your capable of strong debate on bigfooty, thats the kind of stuff we'd like to see in this thread, not the personal jibes.
 
Than it was a strange thing for you to bring up in the thread than to leave the last word in your post to describe him as a sook. It was an inference made by you that could imply to other readers that he had.

Thats a game that could go on for ever, It was irrelevant to the discussion and you were focusing the issue on the person making the posts and not what they had to say.

I've seen your work on BF and know your capable of strong debate on bigfooty, thats the kind of stuff we'd like to see in this thread, not the personal jibes.
Sorry, it was sposed to be a bit toungue in cheek, I used to really enjoy this particular twitter account and found it ridiculous that it got shut down. Anyway, my apologies, carry on....
 
There are some interesting points on this site and many of them are worth discussing.

One thing however is the crime board tries not to be a political zone, this is not to say political pressure cannot be discussed if it is documented but due to the nature of the boards intent we don't want to see a slanging match between right/left etc.

So yes this means we take a higher standard of requesting referenced materiel to continue that part of the discussion. on the website you provided John in it's Library does it specifically have any material in relation to the protection of the airport from political dealings.

If it does not I'm requesting this thread at this point does not go down that road. This does not mean there are many salient facts presented in that site that should be discussed that are relevant to Corby's guilt/innocence or any where in between in proving it.

The first of which is intriguing to me and I don't know is the availability of locally grown marijuana in Bali and how much it costs.

If the claims in this site are correct that it is very cheap and it's inference prevalent than what would be the motive to ship in 4 kilo's of the Australian product in through air travel.

Has anyone any referenced material or ahhmam "knowledge" of this in Bali/Indonesia.


I'd be particularly concerned that some of the material regarding Mark Trowell is libellous. The suggestion is that a QC was acting as a political agent to subvert a criminal trial.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom