- Joined
- Jun 24, 2006
- Posts
- 11,563
- Reaction score
- 13
- Location
- The start of a new era
- AFL Club
- Essendon
"He is off our radar, not because of his illness, we just wouldn't recruit a 30-year-old," Horsburgh said.
Maybe could replace Ray as Chairman?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

WB v SYD · RIC v MEL · HAW v GCS · ESS v COL · PA v GEE · FRE v CAR · StK v WCE · BL v ADE · GWS v NM ·
Weekend Wrap and "Liked, Learned, Hated" right here -- How did tipping go?
"He is off our radar, not because of his illness, we just wouldn't recruit a 30-year-old," Horsburgh said.
Why did he say that?...
Because his age would clash with Knight's youth policy. He flat out said "It's because he's too old!"...
What has Knights considered?...
Stepping outside his youth policy... "If the right person is there, I'll consider it."...
As far as I'm concerned, whether or not Cousin's is picked up, this does raise a few questions when it comes to what we all assume is set in stone...
I can understand why you're frustrated RIG, you never wanted Cousins anyway.
make him president of the social club

RIG,
Why would the chairman be making that call when really it is totally up to the coaching staff to make the call?
Just a question here mate. Not meaning to upset you further
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Should be a pretty good vibe at the functions, which will then be held on a nightly basis![]()

and while we're at it, card people ruining threads with that 'metal arm' rubbishStart carding people. It's been said enough times we're not picking him. Should mean people start to get the message....

RIG,
Why would the chairman be making that call when really it is totally up to the coaching staff to make the call?
Just a question here mate. Not meaning to upset you further
"He is off our radar, not because of his illness, we just wouldn't recruit a 30-year-old," Horsburgh said.
"But Matthew Knights wouldn't recruit a 30-year-old whether it be Ben Cousins or Joe Blow or John Coleman reincarnated."
"He is off our radar, not because of his illness, we just wouldn't recruit a 30-year-old," Horsburgh said.
"But Matthew Knights wouldn't recruit a 30-year-old whether it be Ben Cousins or Joe Blow or John Coleman reincarnated."
That was on November 18. Horsburgh was commenting on behalf of Knights himself.
What has Knights said today?
He is considering experienced, mature players. His stance has changed, so therefore, who is to say it isn't wrong to assume the initial opinion on recruiting Cousins has changed too?...
AFIAK, today's report contradicts the one from a month ago.
IMO, the whole age thing is just a politically correct way of saying we don't want him anywhere near our club
and while we're at it, card people ruining threads with that 'metal arm' rubbish![]()
You are confusing 30 year olds and mature players.
A 25 year old is also a mature player. Skipworth is both mature and experienced.
IMO, the whole age thing is just a politically correct way of saying we don't want him anywhere near our club
I wouldn't mind if the bombers picked him up. But I wouldn't know if Knights would be able to handle him because don't forget Ben Cousins is still to recover from his illness.I have no idea. I'm not upset about it at all, I hope the club will draft him.
Merv,You are confusing 30 year olds and mature players.
A 25 year old is also a mature player. Skipworth is both mature and experienced.
IMO, the whole age thing is just a politically correct way of saying we don't want him anywhere near our club
Yeah...
Or it could be the fact that our Chairman straight out said we will not pick up him.

The reasons FOR picking him up FAR outweigh reasons not too!
Understandable we dont instil a bad culture as ess, but trust me, over the past few years we have had a few on our list just as bad as Benny!
They just werent good players luckily or it could have been exposed!
Not saying that i know this for sure, just speculating so could be completely wrong.