Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
For someone who can't remember the game too vividly can someone tell me why Zacs name was so tarnished? He played against Rocca I think and got a bag kicked against him but Buddy must have kicked nearly 30 goals against Paddy Rider in the last 3 or so games against the Dons.
It didn't take a genius to pick, I got it right, but did not include McEntee. I think Hawthorn made the right decision. T.Clarke, while the right decision should be praised for his contribution to the Hawks. He did not set the benchmark on the field, but certainly did on the training track.
Will Dawson pop up at another club? I think there is a 33% chance.
For someone who can't remember the game too vividly can someone tell me why Zacs name was so tarnished? He played against Rocca I think and got a bag kicked against him but Buddy must have kicked nearly 30 goals against Paddy Rider in the last 3 or so games against the Dons.
No rookie delisting?
Are they all safe or to be announced at a later date?
Im really interested in everyone's opinion on Zac. Now dont get me wrong I reckon the kid is great, infact very friendly. Have had a couple of really good convos with him.
So here's the thing. Yeah he got cut up by Rocca but why is everyone blaming Clarko for that? Clarko left him on Rocca to test Zac out. So should we be giving all of our young players armchair rides and matchups on players who are average so they can look better? Thats not what makes a good player. If anything, Zac should have learnt from that game, trained harder, worked out his deficiencies and earnt his place.
IMO to blame Clarkson for Dawson's delisting is comical. He didnt make it because he simply wasnt good enough and he has had a few years to prove it. He was found out not once, but on multiple occasions by a few different forwards. Decision making was also atrocious at the best of times.
The list management staff have made the right call without doubt. Remember its these same guys that delivered us our premiership 3 weeks ago.
P.S Wish Zac the best on all his future pursuits
Zac Dawson will be taken in the pre-season draft. Probably by a side with no talls like Bulldogs. I also think that if we cant draft what we're after we would be somechance of re-drafting him, Thurgood style.
Tim Clarke would make an excellent captain of Box Hill if no other club shows interest.
Dawson carves up in the VFL. PLays back, forward and even in the ruck, and he plays well.
It is hard to pinpoint the blame with Dawson, but i agree with you, Clarkson was testing him in that Collingwood game.
Only gripe I have was when Rocca was clearly beating him, why didnt Clarko make the move? The kids confidence took an absolute belting.
It was right to try Dawson on Rocca but not right to leave him there and be humiliated.
I thought Zac would get another year tbh, he's a great clubman and I thought he had been playing good enough footy in the 2's.
But thats footy I guess, hope he gets picked up by another club and dominates the Hawks in the future!
Listen to this man.![]()