Crows Chat That 'Doesnt Deserve Its Own Thread' Thread part 2

[Peter Doherty]

So you’re advocating for arbitrary perceptions of controversy to be a device of censorship?

This is too mild to even rate as controversial.

This isn’t holocaust denial or David Icke’s lizard people conspiracy

I'll be damned if I let you drag Icke's good name through this.

 

[Sanders]

I'll be damned if I let you drag Icke's good name through this.

I for one welcome our new lizard overlords

 

[WetCrow1991]

No

Yes. If a bunch of people engage with content A and content B, even if they are unrelated then if a person watches either content A or content B, then they'll be served the other too. Of course the users own history is a factor in what they are served, but also the history of every other user.

 

[Sanders]

Yes. If a bunch of people engage with content A and content B, even if they are unrelated then if a person watches either content A or content B, then they'll be served the other too.

No. That’s what people pretend to themselves

These companies are profiling you at a very sophisticated level to engage with you and sell you stuff

Your therapist knows less about you than Google

 

[arrowman]

I can't believe that people are getting exercised over ROB posting a selfie with Jordan Peterson. To the point where they think the club should "have a word".

Someone said they had written to the club. Seriously? You WROTE TO THE CLUB???

Wow.

 

[WetCrow1991]

No. That’s what people pretend to themselves

These companies are profiling you at a very sophisticated level to engage with you and sell you stuff

Your therapist knows less about you than Google

It's both.

The content engagement habits of all users are profiled, and this impacts the content served to all users.

If a bunch of people who love watching duck videos also love watching videos about trains, then people who watch videos about trains will start to be served videos about ducks, because the algorithm assumes that is content the train lover would like to see.

 

[Sanders]

I can't believe that people are getting exercised over ROB posting a selfie with Jordan Peterson. To the point where they think the club should "have a word".

Someone said they had written to the club. Seriously? You WROTE TO THE CLUB???

Wow.

He had spare crayons going to waste

 

[skittlebrew]

I don't think it is controversial. It just makes sense. Low value, unsuccessful men are Jordan Peterson's target audience. And I think that sums up the Crows no.1 Ruck.

Did Jordan Peterson bring up your childhood trauma of not cleaning your room and not getting dessert?

Same.

From the little I’ve seen he’s a pretty mild 1950s style conservative. Not my cup of tea but I struggle to understand why he gets so much attention and angry opppsition when there are much more extreme right-wing views out there.

His points of view are very uncontroversial, it's only the woke crowd who are pretending to be offended.

 

[cleanhands]

I can't believe that people are getting exercised over ROB posting a selfie with Jordan Peterson. To the point where they think the club should "have a word".

Someone said they had written to the club. Seriously? You WROTE TO THE CLUB???

Wow.

And the worry about the media making an issue out of it

 

[WetCrow1991]

Jordan Peterson brought up your childhood trauma of not cleaning your room and not getting dessert, didn't he?



His points of view are very uncontroversial, it's only the woke crowd who are pretending to be offended by his points of view.

Oh is that right. You're precious.

 

[WetCrow1991]

I can't believe that people are getting exercised over ROB posting a selfie with Jordan Peterson. To the point where they think the club should "have a word".

Someone said they had written to the club. Seriously? You WROTE TO THE CLUB???

Wow.

They need to write to the club, you should too! Everyone!

We need to know when the playing group is adopting the all meat diet. If we don't see at least 3 cases of scurvy by round 5 we should all boycott games.

 

[Sanders]

They need to write to the club, you should too! Everyone!

We need to know when the playing group is adopting the all meat diet. If we don't see at least 3 cases of scurvy by round 5 we should all boycott games.

You’ve “done the research” haven’t you?

 

[arrowman]

And the worry about the media making an issue out of it

I suspect the Venn Diagram of the footy media and the media that cares about JP is two non-intersecting circles.

 

[Kane McGoodwin]

I suspect the Venn Diagram of the footy media and the media that cares about JP is two non-intersecting circles.

I blame ROB for this thread going to complete shit!

 

[arrowman]

If ROB comes out firing next season, the club should hire JP to do some motivational speaking

Thread needs a poll : which Crows player needs to clean their room the most?

 

[Scorpus]

If ROB comes out firing next season, the club should hire JP to do some motivational speaking

Thread needs a poll : which Crows player needs to clean their room the most?

Maybe he can organise a camp. At least he would have... well literally any qualifications

 

[WetCrow1991]

You’ve “done the research” haven’t you?

Yep, getting the diet plan straight from Jordan Peterson himself!

 

[jaytex]

can you name a few controversial left figures that you'd also not want him posting on Insta with?

I wonder what the reaction would be if it were Clementine Ford instead of JP

On SM-A536E using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[Mutineer]

I wonder what the reaction would be if it were Clementine Ford instead of JP

On SM-A536E using BigFooty.com mobile app

LOL

At least JP and Rob would be closer on the intelligence factor, Clementine Ford not nearly so much.

 

[Drugs Are Bad Mackay?]

Does ROB read Harry Potter?

 

[1970crow]

If that would be reasonably expected to be controversial and cause issues for the club then yes

so we're getting there. It's not all politics, it's now a judgement call on what constitutes 'controversy'. And again, outside of all politicians, which you just reversed, can you identify a few individual controversial left wing identities that shouldn't be instagrammed. This shouldn't be hard for you, I'm sure you could name a couple of dozen high profile RWNJs off the top of your head. Just give me your top 5 controversial lefties.

 

[1970crow]

So you’re advocating for arbitrary perceptions of controversy to be a device of censorship?

This is too mild to even rate as controversial.

This isn’t holocaust denial or David Icke’s lizard people conspiracy

This is scorpus projecting his personal bias and using the club as the vehicle to push an agenda against people like JP having any form of platform or public recognition.

 

[1970crow]

He had spare crayons going to waste

you can fit only so many up your nose.

 

[1970crow]

They need to write to the club, you should too! Everyone!

We need to know when the playing group is adopting the all meat diet. If we don't see at least 3 cases of scurvy by round 5 we should all boycott games.

I'm not up with the RNJW/... I am too foolish to read the site rules slur game, but what is the 'all meat diet' about? Is that based on Pete evans and his paleo thing or something more fun like lizard people and the illuminati child trafficking ring that I discovered Qanon was about a few months ago.

 

[Scorpus]

This is scorpus projecting his personal bias and using the club as the vehicle to push an agenda against people like JP having any form of platform or public recognition.

Yes I'm sure Jordan Peterson relies on publicity from AFL players to survive