- Dec 13, 2012
- 5,059
- 8,235
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
- Other Teams
- The Exers
Its on video
Player Watch Dane Swan (Retired 2016)
- Thread starter Shade
- Start date
- Tagged users None
- Apr 20, 2015
- 6,640
- 10,436
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
Ohh
I haven't seen it haha. My bad
jmac70
On the porch
Are you still peddling that same crap?
Tattooed, bleached tips, raging boner, yep it’s Swanny.
jmac70
On the porch
He was relatively quite in grand finals. So what?
didaksrightfoot
Premiership Player
- Sep 12, 2013
- 4,902
- 5,555
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
- Other Teams
- SA Spurs, Juventus
Is there any suggestion that he posted the video? And was it without her consent? (In which case he deserves the serious legal consequences)
If he was not involved in the spreading of it then he's done nothing wrong. (If his partner wants to leave him thats up to her, but nothing we should particularly care about)
If he was not involved in the spreading of it then he's done nothing wrong. (If his partner wants to leave him thats up to her, but nothing we should particularly care about)
jmac70
On the porch
So basically you are saying that we should not consider Swan a club great because of his lifestyle.
*yawn
Can we talk about Elliott’s preseason again? That was a great discussion.
Save it Jmac.
jmac70
On the porch
Well I guess that’s one topic we can agree on.I only stopped by to set that Richmond knob straight on who the bigger club is... he will no longer be in any doubt after checking his PM's
It's my gift to you J... I get to say the things to those turds you can't without losing your account... you're welcome
Why dont you just report and ignore
jmac70
On the porch
I don’t report posts any more.
Dont bite then.
Reporting fake identities is different to reporting posts you dont like. The mods will act.
Its actually an interesting legal exercise. Uploading it publically without consent is highly illegal. Just because a woman diid it not a man doesnt mean the law does not exist.
Of course, but news outlets aren't reporting on it because of the anonymous female doing the recording.
If the activity captured is legal then why do the media believe it's in there right to breach the privacy of Swan by directly naming him or highlighting that a sex tape featuring a former AFL star is being circulated?
Swan has every right to take legal action but for the rest of us this isn't news and I don't care what consensual sexual acts he engages in as it's none of my business.
- Dec 13, 2012
- 5,059
- 8,235
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
- Other Teams
- The Exers
Yep. The HUN have now names him and are running with the storySaw the Video today
It’s 100% him!
Sent from my Warped mind
Yes it is him. He is on the front page of the Herald Sun following his complaint to Police.
- Oct 3, 2013
- 12,290
- 28,536
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
- Other Teams
- Chelsea
Worst kept secret.
None of our business what he does in his private life, but sounds like he's the victim of footage being distributed without his consent.
None of our business what he does in his private life, but sounds like he's the victim of footage being distributed without his consent.
Went to Goddard in the 2nd half of our win and put him to the sword. Played a gun 2nd half and was instrumental in ensuring no comeback in the 2nd game.
left at home
Hall of Famer
Well at least he is retired, so really who cares that much now.
Of course its news. If youre not interested in it thats your prerogative. If teh woman uploaded it without his consent then I hope she cops the full whack of the law that a man would cop in the same situation.
didaksrightfoot
Premiership Player
- Sep 12, 2013
- 4,902
- 5,555
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
- Other Teams
- SA Spurs, Juventus
But it shouldn't be news, and IMO he should be allowed to sue whichever media company released his name.
The ironic, and sad, thing about this is that the guy went to the police with a complaint that his privacy had been breached (or something of the sort). He is the alleged victim in this. He never went to the media. He has not committed a crime. He has not, as far as we know, done anything wrong. There is absolutely no reason for his name to be released.
What gives the media the right to then further breach his privacy? This is bullshit and the media need to be held account.
If this was an 18yo girl who was a victim of revenge pr0n (which this is) and the media blasted her name and face all over the news without her consent - they would be (rightly) ripped to shreds.
Just coz this is a 30yo man who happens to have played footy they are allowed to disclose who it was? What a load of s**t.
Even if it was already on the internet, 99% of people would have never seen it or even known it exists. The media have now made this a national story.
Whatever the person who released the video was trying to achieve (assuming this was some sort of attempt to blackmail) the media have basically handed them the victory. No legal consequences are gonna take back what has happened.
No media story and this would do a quick round of the internet and die away. Now its in the general public domain and open for all.
Similar threads
