StevenwellerHFC
Brownlow Medallist
- Joined
- Jun 16, 2012
- Posts
- 15,751
- Reaction score
- 10,225
- Location
- Ora Banda pub
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- EDL
- Banned
- #101
Every week going to have people crying from a top team winning in a close game.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

LIVE: St Kilda v Hawthorn - Rd 12 - 7:30PM Thu
Squiggle tips Hawks at 66% chance -- What's your tip? -- Injury Lists » -- All Rd 12 Games
Not sure about this one. Hanley was first to the ball when the ball up was called. I'd take a one on one in the pocket, rather than a ball-up with heavy congestion any day of the week. We don't know for sure, however it certainly could have cost Brisbane.Didn't cost Brisbane anyway.
Not sure about this one. Hanley was first to the ball when the ball up was called. I'd take a one on one in the pocket, rather than a ball-up with heavy congestion any day of the week. We don't know for sure, however it certainly could have cost Brisbane.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
The Swans, known for breaking the rules late in close games, called for a stretcher when one wasn't needed. At the time, the ball was deep in the Lions forward pocket.
Did the Swans cheat?
The swans regularly push the limits with holding the man situations. Did you see the tackle by Cunningham on Gardiner over the boundary line. They have to be more consistent.Hanley should have been given a free for McVeigh holding him anyway.
Isn't the rule once the stretcher is called for it must be used and the player has to miss the following 15-20mins?
Isn't the rule once the stretcher is called for it must be used and the player has to miss the following 15-20mins?
Leppitsch said in press conference "I maybe wrong but my understanding was play has to stop before a stretcher can come onto the field."
Boo hoo.Hanley should have been given a free for McVeigh holding him anyway.
Says the St.Kilda supporter, LOL. That's a team with integrity.Sydney are serial cheaters on and off the field. But they are they AFL's favourite team so let's be prepared for nothing to happen
He also said he does not know the rule
Just had a big sook
Maybe he should focus on winning
The AFL will conduct a full investigation to ensure that no breaching of the........Oh wait, it's Sydney. Er...move along everyone, nothing to see here!!
That's not the rule and it's a stupid suggestion. The player can't come back on for the rest of the game (or something to that effect).A stretcher should only be needed for serious injuries. If you suffer a serious injury you won't play the next week. If you use it tactically you sacrifice your player for the next week
If it's based on when the field umpire is aware a stretcher has been called for then it would be risky as all hell to do in your D50 as a ploy, you really can't guarantee who will have possession when the umpire twigs to it. Tn this case nobody had possession, but I really do doubt someone would gamble that the opposition wouldn't gain clear possession (and thus a free kick in their F50) based on that.7.3 USE OF STRETCHER
(d) once the injured Player has been removed from the Playing Surface, the field Umpire shall recommence play as follows depending on the circumstances:
(i) where the football was in dispute at the time play was stopped, by throwing the football;
(ii) where the football was out of bounds at the time play was stopped, by directing the boundary Umpire to throw the football in;
(iii) where a Player had possession of the football at the time play was stopped, by awarding a Free Kick to the Player;
(iv) where a Player had been awarded a Free Kick or a Mark at the time play was stopped, by allowing the Player to dispose of the football.