Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's pretty much how I see it, except where you mention practical. Self identity and recognition are not necessarily grounded in reality, evidently when you have a person that id's differently from their biological reality.
For example you have a 110kg biological male that id's as a women, well that's not a physical reality
To broaden, this sort of 'language' is frowned upon and demonised.
If you look at these terms they define what are socially constructed expectations
Why? Because there's a minority that don't want the female viewed as physically weaker, even though there is no way of avoiding that fact. So we must not mention it.
Same with 'man up', in this day and age it's immediately viewed as some sort of dangerous negative, the noise is never about what it should mean to 'man up' like don't shirk your responsibilities, admit your faults and mistakes, provide guidance where you're required to among other desired traits.
All examples of 'social constructs' that shouldn't be but are hijacked as dangerous negatives by over reactive minorities that is taboo to mention. I think it's all a little hyper sensationalised.
You're (again) conflating gender with biological sex.
It's perfectly possible for a 110kg biological man to identify with (and as) the female gender, and that is the physical reality.
She is a woman, who is biologically male (if that matters).
And for good reason. It entrenches the patriarchy. Girls hear those statements, and assume 'being a girl' is inferior to being a man.
Expectations that can be surmised as 'Men are strong, and take care of things' and also 'Women are weak, and need to be protected'.
No, that's not true at all. You should avoid saying it because all you're doing is reinforcing negative stereotypes about women, and enforcing patriarchy on them.
It's like how you should avoid saying 'That's gay' or using homophobic comments as a form of insult or in a derogatory way.
Any reason why those traits are 'male', or why men are supposedly better at them?
Did you watch the video I posted above?
Here it is again:
By using 'like a girl' as a pejorative
What are you talking about?
You're being an armchair expert, making claims in the face of a mountain of opposing evidence.
Is that all you're talking about? Semantics? Move on Caz.
It's 100% irrelevant.
What is the point of making out it's important at all?
fu** me. This is painful.
You went on a spree about the word gender sometimes being used to mean "biological gender" and "gender identity".
To what end?? Which argument was advanced by that?
It's dumb pedantry and a complete waste of time. I'm out.
Patriarchy in its intended form (evolutionary) is not a bad thing, you should know better. Patriarchy is not tyrannical, those who use it in a tyrannical manner are. - which by the way are definitely a minority.
Impossible not to, it is both a biological definition and a social construct
You're kidding right? Women weren't allowed to vote, work, earn the same amount of money as men when they could work, have control over their own reproduction, choose their own clothes to wear, and a sh*t-load more oppression due to the Patriarchy. Until very recently (last century) they were little more than property.
How on earth is that NOT tyrannical?
Bullshit. Nouns (like tables and houses) have gender in the Romantic languages (Spanish, Italian, French etc).
Do tables and houses physically have balls or a vagina?
If the answer is 'No' (and it is) then its entirely possible to distinguish gender from biological sex.
Because it's no patriarchy doing the bad thing it's bad people, when are you going to get that through your head?
Non binary didn't exist until the occult elite started their gender blurring agenda.
Although nonbinary is often regarded as a new idea, the identifier has been around for as long as civilization has. In fact, nonbinary gender has been recorded as far back as 400 B.C. to 200 A.D., when Hijras — people in India who identified as beyond male or female — were referenced in ancient Hindu texts.
Bullshit. Nouns (like tables and houses) have gender in the Romantic languages (Spanish, Italian, French etc).
Do tables and houses physically have balls or a vagina?
If the answer is 'No' (and it is) then its entirely possible to distinguish gender from biological sex.
Because it makes no ******* sense. The Patriarchy is a social construct for fu**s sake.
Umm Malifice, if you're going to dispute the fact that people in society use gender as a definition of biological sex then you need to provide evidence to support it. You can't.
Umm Malifice, you do realize that hierarchy is NOT a social construct right?
I just ******* did!
French for 'the table':
la table
Which translates to 'the (female) table'. You cant (in French) have le table, because 'le' is male.
Does the table have a vagina?
Fact. Society uses gender as a biological definition, there is no known way to dispute this.
The state of being male or female as expressed by social or cultural distinctions and differences, rather than biological ones; the collective attributes or traits associated with a particular sex, or determined as a result of one's sex