- Joined
- Oct 5, 2003
- Posts
- 3,351
- Reaction score
- 4
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
Drummond said:1. You can’t be serious? Even if he went at pick 17 I still would have been frustrated. I do not doubt that he will be a good player, just whether he’ll be here when he reaches his potential.
2. A player with plenty of potential, someone who could be a 150 game player with the Crows is someone who would justify selection 32. Bernie Vince is simply someone who could be a handy player, he will be nothing more. 50 games is the maximum I would expect out of Vince.
3. I will gladly tell you why Rischbeith should have been picked up with pick 32. He is listed at 190cm, and isn’t a KPP what the crows are desperately lacking? He has the athletic ability, and all he needs to do is build up his body and he gain more experience with Sturt. He would have been a much, much better option that Vince.
1. Once again - he was the best avaliable. You always take the best avaliable regardless of where he lives.
2. We weren't the only club to take risks just in case you don't know. Here's just examples:
- Max Bailey by Hawthorn at pick 18
- Jake Edwads by Carlton at pick 36.
- Jay Neagle by Essendon at 39 (F/S)
- Robert Warnock by Fremantle at 42
- Ryan Gamble by Geelong at 47
- Joel Patful by Brisbane at 56
- Matthew Stokes by Geelong at 61
etc
IMO Vince could be something special = he's a smooth mover with great skills and can find the goals. Nice height too. Obviously he could turn out to be bust but the success rate of the draft isn't as high as some may think - particularly in a weak draft you can take risks. I'm glad we took one.
3. Rischbeith isn't a KPP - he's actually 188cm. He's not what we're looking for - plus he's not an onballer. It's not like we need anymore wingers.





Playing the guilty card are we?

