Strategy Embrace The Journey

Remove this Banner Ad

OK, fair warning - this is a very long post. I had a lot of fun writing it, hopefully it reads well, makes sense and generates some good discussion.

I mentioned this in another thread, but I think it is an interesting enough point of discussion to warrant its own.

The more I think about where we're at currently, the more I see a comparison with the Philadelphia 76ers over in the NBA.

For those of you who are unaware, at the end of the 2012/2013 NBA season (where they finished outside the playoffs with a 34-48 record) the 76ers were at a crossroads, and decided to embark on a complete rebuild.

What has followed since has been named "The Process", a phase of complete overhaul and rebuild of the franchise, both on and off the court.

Throughout the rebuild the franchise has been a laughing stock - they have been queried, critiqued and mocked to no end - but they formulated a plan, and have not wavered from it along the way.

Five years later we are now seeing the fruits of that planning and long term vision, and of the meticulous planning that has gone on behind the scenes.

Consider each season since, and the win/loss record of the 76ers:

2013/2014 - 19 wins, 63 losses (.232) - Season (1)
2014/2015 - 18 wins, 64 losses (.220) - Season (2)
2015/2016 - 10 wins, 72 losses (.122) - Season (3)
2016/2017 - 28 wins, 54 losses (.341) - Season (4)
2017/2018 - 52 wins, 30 losses (.634) - Season (5)

Note: Philadelphia recently finished the 2017/2018 regular season 3rd in the Eastern Conference, and are a good chance to progress deep into the playoffs.

So, how did they go about this rebuild?

Timeline

2013 off-season

- Hired a new Head Coach, Brett Brown. Brett never played NBA, but had served as an assistant coach in the NBA, and had previously been a Head Coach for many years in Australia.

- Traded their best player, an All-Star, on draft night for the draft rights to the number 6 pick (Nerlens Noel) + a future first round pick.

- With their first pick, selected Michael Carter-Williams, who went on to be named the Rookie Of The Year in 2013/2014

2013/2014 - Season (1)

- Philadelphia tied the NBA record for most consecutive losses (26).

- Finished with a 19-63 record.

2014 off-season

- Drafted Joel Embiid (pick 3), Elfrid Payton (pick 10)

2014/2015 - Season (2)

- Elfrid Payton, taken at pick 10, was traded on draft night for Dario Saric (pick 12, who only joined the team prior to the 2016/2017 season), a future first round pick, and a future second round pick.

- Philadelphia finished with an 18-64 record, after starting the season with 17 straight losses.

- Joel Embiid, taken at pick 3 in the draft, sat out the entire year due to injury.

- Michael Carter-Williams, named ROTY just one season prior, was traded for a first round pick.

2015 off-season

- Drafted Jahlil Okafor at pick 3

2015/2016 - Season (3)

- Finished with a 10-72 record, the second worst record in franchise history.

- Incurred the longest losing streak in American sports history with 28 consecutive losses

- For the second year in a row, Joel Embiid did not play a game due to injury

- Completed relatively minor trades, providing access to a future first round pick, and moved on a number of future second round picks for an established player.

2016 off-season

- Drafted our very own Ben Simmons with the first overall pick

2016/2017 - Season (4)

- Ben Simmons ruled out for his entire rookie season with a foot injury

- Joel Embiid, their pick 3 from 2014, finally makes his long-anticipated debut and plays 31 games.

- Dario Saric, traded to the franchise on draft day 2014, finally comes across from Europe, 3 seasons after being drafted

- Importantly, this season is the first time throughout "The Process" that the Sixers went down the Free Agency path, adding Jerryd Bayless, Sergio Rodriguez, and veteran Gerald Henderson Jnr

- Finished the season with a record of 28-54

- Traded Nerlens Noel (acquired after the 2012/2013 season) for a 2017 1st round draft pick, a 2018 1st round draft pick, a 2015 1st round pick and Andrew Bogut, who was waived just a few days later

- Traded pick 3 + a future 1st round pick for pick 1 in the 2017 draft

2017 off-season

- Selected Markelle Fultz with the first overall pick

2017/2018 - Season (5)

- Ben Simmons makes his long-awaited debut after missing the entire 2016/2017 season

- Markelle Fultz, taken at pick 1 in the draft, missed most of the year due to injury

- This was Philadelphia's first 50-win season since 2000/2001.

- Finished the season with a 52-30 record, including a game winning streak, plus the first game of the first round of playoffs, to end the season

- Traded Jahlil Okafor, who they took at pick 3 in the 2015 draft, effectively for salary cap relief.

So where are the similarities?

There are obviously significant differences between the two codes, and in particular the ability and speed at which clubs can rebuild, but I see a number of similarities which are worth taking note of:

1) Middling clubs.
Both clubs were middle of the road when they made the decision to rebuild, effectively stuck in no mans land.

2) Culture is king.
The 76ers as an organization are tremendously proud of the culture they have built over the past few years, both on and off the court. This has been a priority for Bolton since his appointment as senior coach.

3) Process > Results.
Positive results are nice - after all, they provide "emotional nourishment" - but the process is critical. Get that right and results will follow.

4) Being just OK isn't enough.
This is the mantra that really sparked the 76ers into action, and I believe we have followed suit. From day one the club has said we're not after immediate glory, but rather a period of sustained success.

5) Both clubs hired an untried head coach.
Brett Brown had no NBA playing experience, nor did Bolton play AFL. Both however were appointed on the back of assistant coaching roles at very successful clubs (Brown at San Antonio Spurs, Bolton at Hawthorn), and both spent time coaching their own clubs (Brown the North Melbourne Giants, Bolton had a number of senior coaching roles)

6) Going backward, to go forward.
As you can see (way) above, Philadelphia went from 34 wins, to 19, down to 18, then right down to 10 wins before they started their rebound. Carlton started from a lower base, and adopted the scorched earth policy at the end of 2015.

The below is purely superficial and hypothetical, but if we're to apply the 76ers winning percentages to our next few years, we get the following:

2016 - 7 wins, 15 losses (.318)
2017 - 6 wins, 16 losses (.273)
2018 - .122 = 2-3 wins
2019 - .341 = 7-8 wins
2020 - .634 = 13-14 wins

Note: In years one and two of our rebuild our winning % was slightly higher, and I expect each season to be similar - so instead of 2-3 this year, we may be looking more at 3-5.

I know there is much doom and gloom surrounding our performances this year, but next year looks right to me. I have consistently said I expect to see significant improvement starting next season, and I have not wavered from that. 7-9 wins is realistic, but it is not unreasonable to suggest we may win more.

2020 I fully expect to make the finals.

The Hard Questions

1) Will we trade a major asset?

Throughout "The Process", the 76ers have been bold, and not shied away from making some big calls on the trade table.

The entire process started when they moved on their only All-Star, Jrue Holiday, for a number of high draft picks over a two year period.

They have then proceeded to trade Michael Carter-Williams (pick 11 2013, traded in 2014/2015), Elfrid Payton (pick 10 2014, traded on draft night), Nerlens Noel (pick 6 2013, traded in 2016/2017) and Jahlil Okafor (pick 3 2015, traded in 2017/2018).

We've deliberately ensured we have a heavy presence in the early stages of the draft, but would we consider doing something similar, perhaps with someone like Weitering or McKay?

In truth, I suspect not, but SOS has shown himself to be ruthless - so can we rule it out completely?

Have we diminished any need to go down this path, by previously jettisoning established talent in the early years of the rebuild to generate currency?

2) When will we look to Free Agency?

We have already gone down the path of delisted free agency, but RFA/UFA is a whole new ball game (pardon the pun).

Interesting to note is that the 76ers had three full years of rebuilding through the draft, before they decided to dabble in free agency.

But importantly, when they did decide to go down the free agency path, they didn't go after any big names, and still haven't. Instead they went for a number of mid-to-lower tier free agents, as well as adding some veteran presence.

If we are to follow a similar path, we may look to free agency after three full years of rebuilding, which would bring us to the end of this season.

And this is exactly what I alluded to elsewhere on the board - there are big names to choose from at the end of this year, including Sloane, Lynch, McGovern and maybe Gaff.

Are we better off going for one of those, or would it be smarter to go for a few of the mid-to-lower tier FAs - Guthrie, Wallis, Dahlhaus, Atley the most noteworthy.

And then, if we're talking veteran presence and leadership, do guys like Mundy, McVeigh, Smith, Lecras and Rischitelli come into consideration?

TL;DR - Don't do that to me - this took an eternity to put together, the least you could do is read it!

But really - Embrace The Journey! Apologies for the corny catch-phrase, but "Trust The Process" isn't a whole lot better!

This was a lot of fun to put together, and the similarities between the two rebuilds are very evident. I always try to ignore the external noise (from the media, in particular), and this has only strengthened my confidence that we are doing the right thing, and that things will turn around sooner than many think.

I believe SOS has spent a fair bit of time in the USA over the past few years, particularly in preparation for the introduction of live pick trading, but I wonder how closely he has followed "The Process" and if it has influenced his decisions since returning to the club.

Would love to read your thoughts - on any or all of the above.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Interesting post. Tbh I usually cringe when people compare the AFL or its teams to US sports, as it feels like people are automatically assuming anything the US does is an improvement on what we do and we should blindly copy them. I like you haven't done that. Some actual thought and analysis obviously went in to this - though you know we can't have nice things and a reasoned analysis like this surely can't remain unsullied. Cue the ranties.
 
OK, fair warning - this is a very long post. I had a lot of fun writing it, hopefully it reads well, makes sense and generates some good discussion.

I mentioned this in another thread, but I think it is an interesting enough point of discussion to warrant its own.

The more I think about where we're at currently, the more I see a comparison with the Philadelphia 76ers over in the NBA.

For those of you who are unaware, at the end of the 2012/2013 NBA season (where they finished outside the playoffs with a 34-48 record) the 76ers were at a crossroads, and decided to embark on a complete rebuild.

What has followed since has been named "The Process", a phase of complete overhaul and rebuild of the franchise, both on and off the court.

Throughout the rebuild the franchise has been a laughing stock - they have been queried, critiqued and mocked to no end - but they formulated a plan, and have not wavered from it along the way.

Five years later we are now seeing the fruits of that planning and long term vision, and of the meticulous planning that has gone on behind the scenes.

Consider each season since, and the win/loss record of the 76ers:

2013/2014 - 19 wins, 63 losses (.232) - Season (1)
2014/2015 - 18 wins, 64 losses (.220) - Season (2)
2015/2016 - 10 wins, 72 losses (.122) - Season (3)
2016/2017 - 28 wins, 54 losses (.341) - Season (4)
2017/2018 - 52 wins, 30 losses (.634) - Season (5)

Note: Philadelphia recently finished the 2017/2018 regular season 3rd in the Eastern Conference, and are a good chance to progress deep into the playoffs.

So, how did they go about this rebuild?

Timeline

2013 off-season

- Hired a new Head Coach, Brett Brown. Brett never played NBA, but had served as an assistant coach in the NBA, and had previously been a Head Coach for many years in Australia.

- Traded their best player, an All-Star, on draft night for the draft rights to the number 6 pick (Nerlens Noel) + a future first round pick.

- With their first pick, selected Michael Carter-Williams, who went on to be named the Rookie Of The Year in 2013/2014

2013/2014 - Season (1)

- Philadelphia tied the NBA record for most consecutive losses (26).

- Finished with a 19-63 record.

2014 off-season

- Drafted Joel Embiid (pick 3), Elfrid Payton (pick 10)

2014/2015 - Season (2)

- Elfrid Payton, taken at pick 10, was traded on draft night for Dario Saric (pick 12, who only joined the team prior to the 2016/2017 season), a future first round pick, and a future second round pick.

- Philadelphia finished with an 18-64 record, after starting the season with 17 straight losses.

- Joel Embiid, taken at pick 3 in the draft, sat out the entire year due to injury.

- Michael Carter-Williams, named ROTY just one season prior, was traded for a first round pick.

2015 off-season

- Drafted Jahlil Okafor at pick 3

2015/2016 - Season (3)

- Finished with a 10-72 record, the second worst record in franchise history.

- Incurred the longest losing streak in American sports history with 28 consecutive losses

- For the second year in a row, Joel Embiid did not play a game due to injury

- Completed relatively minor trades, providing access to a future first round pick, and moved on a number of future second round picks for an established player.

2016 off-season

- Drafted our very own Ben Simmons with the first overall pick

2016/2017 - Season (4)

- Ben Simmons ruled out for his entire rookie season with a foot injury

- Joel Embiid, their pick 3 from 2014, finally makes his long-anticipated debut and plays 31 games.

- Dario Saric, traded to the franchise on draft day 2014, finally comes across from Europe, 3 seasons after being drafted

- Importantly, this season is the first time throughout "The Process" that the Sixers went down the Free Agency path, adding Jerryd Bayless, Sergio Rodriguez, and veteran Gerald Henderson Jnr

- Finished the season with a record of 28-54

- Traded Nerlens Noel (acquired after the 2012/2013 season) for a 2017 1st round draft pick, a 2018 1st round draft pick, a 2015 1st round pick and Andrew Bogut, who was waived just a few days later

- Traded pick 3 + a future 1st round pick for pick 1 in the 2017 draft

2017 off-season

- Selected Markelle Fultz with the first overall pick

2017/2018 - Season (5)

- Ben Simmons makes his long-awaited debut after missing the entire 2016/2017 season

- Markelle Fultz, taken at pick 1 in the draft, missed most of the year due to injury

- This was Philadelphia's first 50-win season since 2000/2001.

- Finished the season with a 52-30 record, including a game winning streak, plus the first game of the first round of playoffs, to end the season

- Traded Jahlil Okafor, who they took at pick 3 in the 2015 draft, effectively for salary cap relief.

So where are the similarities?

There are obviously significant differences between the two codes, and in particular the ability and speed at which clubs can rebuild, but I see a number of similarities which are worth taking note of:

1) Middling clubs.
Both clubs were middle of the road when they made the decision to rebuild, effectively stuck in no mans land.

2) Culture is king.
The 76ers as an organization are tremendously proud of the culture they have built over the past few years, both on and off the court. This has been a priority for Bolton since his appointment as senior coach.

3) Process > Results.
Positive results are nice - after all, they provide "emotional nourishment" - but the process is critical. Get that right and results will follow.

4) Being just OK isn't enough.
This is the mantra that really sparked the 76ers into action, and I believe we have followed suit. From day one the club has said we're not after immediate glory, but rather a period of sustained success.

5) Both clubs hired an untried head coach.
Brett Brown had no NBA playing experience, nor did Bolton play AFL. Both however were appointed on the back of assistant coaching roles at very successful clubs (Brown at San Antonio Spurs, Bolton at Hawthorn), and both spent time coaching their own clubs (Brown the North Melbourne Giants, Bolton had a number of senior coaching roles)

6) Going backward, to go forward.
As you can see (way) above, Philadelphia went from 34 wins, to 19, down to 18, then right down to 10 wins before they started their rebound. Carlton started from a lower base, and adopted the scorched earth policy at the end of 2015.

The below is purely superficial and hypothetical, but if we're to apply the 76ers winning percentages to our next few years, we get the following:

2016 - 7 wins, 15 losses (.318)
2017 - 6 wins, 16 losses (.273)
2018 - .122 = 2-3 wins
2019 - .341 = 7-8 wins
2020 - .634 = 13-14 wins

Note: In years one and two of our rebuild our winning % was slightly higher, and I expect each season to be similar - so instead of 2-3 this year, we may be looking more at 3-5.

I know there is much doom and gloom surrounding our performances this year, but next year looks right to me. I have consistently said I expect to see significant improvement starting next season, and I have not wavered from that. 7-9 wins is realistic, but it is not unreasonable to suggest we may win more.

2020 I fully expect to make the finals.

The Hard Questions

1) Will we trade a major asset?

Throughout "The Process", the 76ers have been bold, and not shied away from making some big calls on the trade table.

The entire process started when they moved on their only All-Star, Jrue Holiday, for a number of high draft picks over a two year period.

They have then proceeded to trade Michael Carter-Williams (pick 11 2013, traded in 2014/2015), Elfrid Payton (pick 10 2014, traded on draft night), Nerlens Noel (pick 6 2013, traded in 2016/2017) and Jahlil Okafor (pick 3 2015, traded in 2017/2018).

We've deliberately ensured we have a heavy presence in the early stages of the draft, but would we consider doing something similar, perhaps with someone like Weitering or McKay?

In truth, I suspect not, but SOS has shown himself to be ruthless - so can we rule it out completely?

Have we diminished any need to go down this path, by previously jettisoning established talent in the early years of the rebuild to generate currency?

2) When will we look to Free Agency?

We have already gone down the path of delisted free agency, but RFA/UFA is a whole new ball game (pardon the pun).

Interesting to note is that the 76ers had three full years of rebuilding through the draft, before they decided to dabble in free agency.

But importantly, when they did decide to go down the free agency path, they didn't go after any big names, and still haven't. Instead they went for a number of mid-to-lower tier free agents, as well as adding some veteran presence.

If we are to follow a similar path, we may look to free agency after three full years of rebuilding, which would bring us to the end of this season.

And this is exactly what I alluded to elsewhere on the board - there are big names to choose from at the end of this year, including Sloane, Lynch, McGovern and maybe Gaff.

Are we better off going for one of those, or would it be smarter to go for a few of the mid-to-lower tier FAs - Guthrie, Wallis, Dahlhaus, Atley the most noteworthy.

And then, if we're talking veteran presence and leadership, do guys like Mundy, McVeigh, Smith, Lecras and Rischitelli come into consideration?

TL;DR - Don't do that to me - this took an eternity to put together, the least you could do is read it!

But really - Embrace The Journey! Apologies for the corny catch-phrase, but "Trust The Process" isn't a whole lot better!

This was a lot of fun to put together, and the similarities between the two rebuilds are very evident. I always try to ignore the external noise (from the media, in particular), and this has only strengthened my confidence that we are doing the right thing, and that things will turn around sooner than many think.

I believe SOS has spent a fair bit of time in the USA over the past few years, particularly in preparation for the introduction of live pick trading, but I wonder how closely he has followed "The Process" and if it has influenced his decisions since returning to the club.

Would love to read your thoughts - on any or all of the above.

Great post

People should put the difference in games to one side. Easiest way, is to insert an AFL club like ours in each senario.

The main point that people need to embrace, as boring as it may be:

"Get the process right, results will follow"

Analyse and tweak, but do not deviate
 
Last edited:
We've deliberately ensured we have a heavy presence in the early stages of the draft, but would we consider doing something similar, perhaps with someone like Weitering or McKay?

In truth, I suspect not, but SOS has shown himself to be ruthless - so can we rule it out completely?
I think it's likely that SOS and the list management people know that the strategy we employed to pick a surplus of key position players early on will result in us having to trade some. There's been plenty of talk every now and then about whether we will end up trading someone like Macreadie simply because they aren't getting a game due to who is in front.

So in some ways, I think trading out the picks we have made as part of the rebuild is something they fully embrace, but, I don't think we'd entertain trading out the high picks like Weitering and McKay as you alluded to. Not unless we were completely confident in the rest of the tall forwards and defenders we had, and were having some serious issues with team balance because the midfielders didn't 'come on' or we couldn't secure any quality free agents in the midfield.

In a scenario where Kerr and De Koning really improved out of sight and at least one was an automatic selection alongside Charlie Curnow up forward, but our plan to pick up 2-3 quality FAs/Uncontracted players like Gaff, Shiel and Wines didn't come to fruition - that's when they should entertain the idea of trading McKay for a high pick in order to keep bringing in the quality talent.
 
Really interesting comparison. I wonder how much a difference the number of players per team makes a difference between the sports in relation to rebuild times.

Good point, IMO it makes a big difference. One player can make a massive difference to a team (lebron @ Cavs, Kyrie @ celtics etc). Unfortunately with AFL there are 22 players in a team, which just increases the amount of time it takes to bring in the right amount of talent.

Agree with what the OP says though. It is a process and what Carlton are doing is not too dissimilar to what the Sixers have done.

Think it also highlights how important drafting the right players is. And how devastating poor recruiting can be. Hopefully the picks we’ve taken in the last couple of drafts bear the fruit that we hope they will. If they don’t the rebuild could take a lot longer..
 
Great effort.

Our "process" seems similar to the 76ers.

There has been some comment in our media that the type of build we are doing maybe somewhat superseded by some of the better performing clubs like Hawks, Swans, Cats. They suggest they are smarter and never need to bottom out because they simultaneously use FA, trading & draft.

NBA fans can correct me, but l would image FA, draft & Trading has been happening a lot longer over there so the 76ers have chosen the complete rebuild & now are starting to show positive results which is good to see.

We have made tough decisions by trading out very good players for early picks. We can now start looking forward to FA
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

I'd had similar thoughts as a basketball fan, but I think there are some important differences too.

The 76ers starting point was one of strength - they were a playoff team, had been for several years, and began by trading away a 22yo all-star (Jrue Holliday). We started from a position of weakness - a last-placed finish, with an ageing list and very little choice to do otherwise.

The second big difference is that their premise is based on the idea that to succeed in the NBA you need 1 or 2 absolute superstars, because of the disproportionate influence those players have on the game (with only 5 on the court, and a more diluted talent pool across 30 teams, etc). In contrast, the AFL has shown time and again that having the best player (eg: Ablett on the Suns, Dangerfield in Geelong) isn't necessarily the way to succeed, and a more balanced list can be preferable.

Worth considering that Philly only really made a jump after abandoning the process, and instead signing some key free agents and adopting a more conventional strategy. Sure, the 'process' continued, because they were so bad that they obtained another #1 pick to get Simmons afterwards, but even they couldn't stick it out.

One thing that is common, though, is the fanbase commitment to the 'journey', the mature acknowledgement that it will take time to get tot where we want to be, and not trying to go for a quick fix. There's no doubt that Philly's strategy has impacted on ours; we haven't gone quite to their lengths yet.

For us, I think the 'journey' needs to be a bit different. We've gutted the list at critical spots, in the hope that our young players will become match-winners. We literally won't win a game unless Cripps, Curnow, Weitering, etc win it for us. What we can enjoy is watching the young players and seeing who steps up, and tracking those moments.

It's an interesting comparison though.
 
Great post

People should put the difference i games to one side. Easiest way, is to insert an AFL like ours in each senario.

The main point that people need to embrace, as boring as it may be:

"Get the process right, results will follow"

Analyse and tweak, but do not deviate

The afl is a zero sum game, so whilst we might be getting the process right, there are plenty of other sides doing the same thing. We cant all be winners. What makes our process any more special than other rebuilding clubs. We have no entitlement to being better than other clubs. I am not surprised that we have lost our first 4 games, not that i necessarily expected to lose them, but i certainly didnt subscribe to the prevailing view that it was an easy start to the year. The reality is there are clubs that are contending and there are clubs, like us, who are rebuilding/reinventing themselves, and no clubs are easy beats any more. We dont have a mortgage on being the team with the best rebuild, we are one of many. .
 
We don't even have the sprouts of a successful rebuild after 3 drafts. to continue the comparison is pie in the sky stuff we have no substance and no evidence of it happening.
 
I'd had similar thoughts as a basketball fan, but I think there are some important differences too.

The 76ers starting point was one of strength - they were a playoff team, had been for several years, and began by trading away a 22yo all-star (Jrue Holliday). We started from a position of weakness - a last-placed finish, with an ageing list and very little choice to do otherwise.

The second big difference is that their premise is based on the idea that to succeed in the NBA you need 1 or 2 absolute superstars, because of the disproportionate influence those players have on the game (with only 5 on the court, and a more diluted talent pool across 30 teams, etc). In contrast, the AFL has shown time and again that having the best player (eg: Ablett on the Suns, Dangerfield in Geelong) isn't necessarily the way to succeed, and a more balanced list can be preferable.

Worth considering that Philly only really made a jump after abandoning the process, and instead signing some key free agents and adopting a more conventional strategy. Sure, the 'process' continued, because they were so bad that they obtained another #1 pick to get Simmons afterwards, but even they couldn't stick it out.

One thing that is common, though, is the fanbase commitment to the 'journey', the mature acknowledgement that it will take time to get tot where we want to be, and not trying to go for a quick fix. There's no doubt that Philly's strategy has impacted on ours; we haven't gone quite to their lengths yet.

For us, I think the 'journey' needs to be a bit different. We've gutted the list at critical spots, in the hope that our young players will become match-winners. We literally won't win a game unless Cripps, Curnow, Weitering, etc win it for us. What we can enjoy is watching the young players and seeing who steps up, and tracking those moments.

It's an interesting comparison though.

Which 'Key Free agents' Did they get?

Reddick is the only one who comes to mind and for them that is like us getting someone like ASOS older veteran who can fill a role for a few years.
 
I think it's likely that SOS and the list management people know that the strategy we employed to pick a surplus of key position players early on will result in us having to trade some. There's been plenty of talk every now and then about whether we will end up trading someone like Macreadie simply because they aren't getting a game due to who is in front.

So in some ways, I think trading out the picks we have made as part of the rebuild is something they fully embrace, but, I don't think we'd entertain trading out the high picks like Weitering and McKay as you alluded to. Not unless we were completely confident in the rest of the tall forwards and defenders we had, and were having some serious issues with team balance because the midfielders didn't 'come on' or we couldn't secure any quality free agents in the midfield.

In a scenario where Kerr and De Koning really improved out of sight and at least one was an automatic selection alongside Charlie Curnow up forward, but our plan to pick up 2-3 quality FAs/Uncontracted players like Gaff, Shiel and Wines didn't come to fruition - that's when they should entertain the idea of trading McKay for a high pick in order to keep bringing in the quality talent.

They traded away currency, Noel, Iggy, Jrue, MCW, etc

Just like we have. Gibbs, Henderson, Touhey, etc.

Doubt we will go down the route of trading our younger guys, the reason being, We drafted taller players, who take time. By the time they will really be hitting their straps so will the team.

If we have a surplus so be it, but they would be playing VFL and wouldn't have the same currency.
 
I think it's likely that SOS and the list management people know that the strategy we employed to pick a surplus of key position players early on will result in us having to trade some. There's been plenty of talk every now and then about whether we will end up trading someone like Macreadie simply because they aren't getting a game due to who is in front.

So in some ways, I think trading out the picks we have made as part of the rebuild is something they fully embrace, but, I don't think we'd entertain trading out the high picks like Weitering and McKay as you alluded to. Not unless we were completely confident in the rest of the tall forwards and defenders we had, and were having some serious issues with team balance because the midfielders didn't 'come on' or we couldn't secure any quality free agents in the midfield.

In a scenario where Kerr and De Koning really improved out of sight and at least one was an automatic selection alongside Charlie Curnow up forward, but our plan to pick up 2-3 quality FAs/Uncontracted players like Gaff, Shiel and Wines didn't come to fruition - that's when they should entertain the idea of trading McKay for a high pick in order to keep bringing in the quality talent.
what will you get for key positions that aren't playing or played out of position in a very underwhelming team?
you're not getting much
 
what will you get for key positions that aren't playing or played out of position in a very underwhelming team?
you're not getting much
Same could be said about any player not getting a gig. I probably wasnt clear, but the inference in my post was that all those players were actually playing decent footy. Otherwise nobody is going to pay up anything worth the original price.

Perhaps a more reasonable hypothetical is that Curnow and McKay are playing good footy and auto-selected in the best 22 through the 2019 season. Kerr is kicking 3-4 goals a game in the VFL and can't get a look in. Similarly, Macreadie is a dour defender who can't get a gig behind Weitering, Plowman, Marchbank et al who are all working as a defensive unit brilliantly. Those two guys - picked very late in their draft year - are suddenly netting picks under 30 for us. I'd say it's probably more likely that this is the case than a midfielder in the same position.
 
The afl is a zero sum game, so whilst we might be getting the process right, there are plenty of other sides doing the same thing. We cant all be winners. What makes our process any more special than other rebuilding clubs. We have no entitlement to being better than other clubs. I am not surprised that we have lost our first 4 games, not that i necessarily expected to lose them, but i certainly didnt subscribe to the prevailing view that it was an easy start to the year. The reality is there are clubs that are contending and there are clubs, like us, who are rebuilding/reinventing themselves, and no clubs are easy beats any more. We dont have a mortgage on being the team with the best rebuild, we are one of many. .

Just because other sides are also rebuilding, doesn't mean their process looks anything like ours.

I am a little surprised by some of your comments, I sure you were very bullish regarding our season, in fact predicting a top 8 finish
 
Well...a couple of things...u only need 2 great players to change a basketball team success
Afl need a lot more...so a bit easier to get better quicker
Ben Simmons- rookie dominating ........We don’t have 1 of those

But then u kinda lost me at basketball :tearsofjoy:
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top