Remove this Banner Ad

Essendon’s AFL Profile Discussion

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

dave10

Norm Smith Medallist
Apr 26, 2004
5,090
4,642
Melbourne
AFL Club
Essendon
I’ve been thinking for quite some time that Essendon’s voice in the AFL community has diminished. It has become a somewhat irrelevant club in a competitive national competition.

Take the lockdown period as the latest case in point. I read about Collingwood’s training preparations and see photos of their training in the newspaper every week. Sometimes several times a week. Richmond feature prominently. Essendon training rarely covered, very little in the way of photos in the newspaper. Maybe the media find it much easier to lob into the Holden Centre for a quick photo? Is that good for Essendon? I’d argue Essendon’s training location is impacting its profile and coverage...

Second, I rarely see Essendon leading by example in the mainstream media on football issues these days. Where’s Tanner? Where’s Essendon’s voice in the football community on the big issues? What’s Essendon’s position on crowds coming back, campaigning for its members to be back at games? Leading the discussion on what football will look like post COVID. The only time we hear from them are when there’s a Dreamtime or ANZAC game approaching. Other than that it’s silence from Tullamarine.

In addition, when any discussion turns to the prominent clubs it’s now routinely Collingwood, Richmond, Hawthorn and West Coast...When did Essendon disappear? Where did Essendon’s powerful position in the league go to?

I think the above feeds into the narrative that Essendon has become a complicit, compliant, somewhat irrelevant club in a large national competition. It’s become a club that follows in behind the discussion. It won’t engage in debates and appears to be comfortable being a nice football club. It isn’t respected like it once was for many reasons and this is a real shame for its legions of fans.

I long for the day when Essendon becomes a leading voice, a prominent and powerful club both on and off field. A leader not a follower. It hasn’t led for years. I want to see a ruthless edge. A bit of mongrel. A bold but calculated decision. Eg: Allow the list management committee to recruit Marlion Pickett if it thinks this will help them win finals....

It needs a jolt. A voice. A profile again. It’s certainly feels like it’s not a great deal of anything these days hasn’t been for at least 8 years.
 
Last edited:
It's a simple one I think. The last time we were front and centre was because we drug cheated. Since then we are simply a middle of the road team and get treated as such.

I couldn't care less about how much media we get. And it won't change until we become a threat on field. So before the press starts pumping up our tyres (like we attempt to do), we just need to win some games.
 
All the teams you mention have been successful of late & until our team starts playing consistently good footy & winning finals again, we will just have to keep riding this funk we are in. Hopefully the new coaches & a bit more distance from you know what & the turn around wont be far away.
 
The place has been gutted and rememerged with all the individuality of neopolitan icecream. Pick any one of the 3 flavours and thats us - pink for example.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

The less media the better - Do the compulsory media and focus on content through the website - EFC like most clubs does good work in the community BUT it doesn't have to be glorified in the media - Focus on winning footy and having a stable financial situation - That's enough.
 
A lot of that’s driven by individual styles. Tanner has been dead silent on almost everything which I find strange given his background. It must be deliberate.
It is deliberate.

Xavier Campbel spoke on his behalf (and made mention of the fact that Tanner prefers to let others do the talking) at president’s functions last year.
 
I’ve been thinking for quite some time that Essendon’s voice in the AFL community has diminished. It has become a somewhat irrelevant club in a competitive national competition.

Take the lockdown period as the latest case in point. I read about Collingwood’s training preparations and see photos of their training in the newspaper every week. Sometimes several times a week. Richmond feature prominently. Essendon training rarely covered, very little in the way of photos in the newspaper. Maybe the media find it much easier to lob into the Holden Centre for a quick photo? Is that good for Essendon? I’d argue Essendon’s training location is impacting its profile and coverage...

Second, I rarely see Essendon leading by example in the mainstream media on football issues these days. Where’s Tanner? Where’s Essendon’s voice in the football community on the big issues? What’s Essendon’s position on crowds coming back, campaigning for its members to be back at games? Leading the discussion on what football will look like post COVID. The only time we hear from them are when there’s a Dreamtime or ANZAC game approaching. Other than that it’s silence from Tullamarine.

In addition, when any discussion turns to the prominent clubs it’s now routinely Collingwood, Richmond, Hawthorn and West Coast...When did Essendon disappear? Where did Essendon’s powerful position in the league go to?

I think the above feeds into the narrative that Essendon has become a complicit, compliant, somewhat irrelevant club in a large national competition. It’s become a club that follows in behind the discussion. It won’t engage in debates and appears to be comfortable being a nice football club. It isn’t respected like it once was for many reasons and this is a real shame for its legions of fans.

I long for the day when Essendon becomes a leading voice, a prominent and powerful club both on and off field. A leader not a follower. It hasn’t led for years. I want to see a ruthless edge. A bit of mongrel. A bold but calculated decision. Eg: Allow the list management committee to recruit Marlion Pickett if it thinks this will help them win finals....

It needs a jolt. A voice. A profile again. It’s certainly feels like it’s not a great deal of anything these days hasn’t been for at least 8 years.

And being front and center worked out how last time around ?
It has a been a deliberate ploy to scale back the hype. To talk the talk you need to be able to walk the walk. Until we show something on the field I am happy for them to fly under the radar.
 
I don't dismiss the thread premise. I understand they are damned if they do and damned if they don't to a large extent but that said we are a high profile club across the country and have been largely irrelevant for 2 decades - something that won't necessarily change any time soon

There's an argument for making some announcements at least, putting some pressure on the club's leadership to perform and also flagging intentions to the supporters. Benny and Peggy came out and staked their intentions for Richmond (and were laughed at by many - me included) and got it done.

Saying nothing can also be seen as avoiding the facts as well. Not coming out and calling things for what they are which for a long time now has been a club performing below expectations. You can't expect to simply let your actions to the talking and get away with it if you are terrible for years.
 
I don't dismiss the thread premise. I understand they are damned if they do and damned if they don't to a large extent but that said we are a high profile club across the country and have been largely irrelevant for 2 decades - something that won't necessarily change any time soon

There's an argument for making some announcements at least, putting some pressure on the club's leadership to perform and also flagging intentions to the supporters. Benny and Peggy came out and staked their intentions for Richmond (and were laughed at by many - me included) and got it done.

Saying nothing can also be seen as avoiding the facts as well. Not coming out and calling things for what they are which for a long time now has been a club performing below expectations. You can't expect to simply let your actions to the talking and get away with it if you are terrible for years.

I will donate $20 if you do a Benny and Peggy.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

It is deliberate.

Xavier Campbel spoke on his behalf (and made mention of the fact that Tanner prefers to let others do the talking) at president’s functions last year.

find it strange to be honest. Would think you use your board’s skills as best you can. If Tanner didn’t intend to do that, kinda wonder why he took the gig.
 
find it strange to be honest. Would think you use your board’s skills as best you can. If Tanner didn’t intend to do that, kinda wonder why he took the gig.
I can see where you are coming and agree to an extent fwiw and I can also see the merit in him being more of a facilitator than a figurehead. I guess it all depends on how you view leadership.
 
I can see where you are coming and agree to an extent fwiw and I can also see the merit in him being more of a facilitator than a figurehead. I guess it all depends on how you view leadership.

All leaders have their own approach and none are right or wrong, it depends on the situation and how good they are at doing it.

As a former Federal Pollie who was minister of some major portfolios, I highly, highly doubt the quiet background type is his natural style.

Guess that's why i found it strange.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Remove this Banner Ad

Essendon’s AFL Profile Discussion

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top