Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
What would be the minimum players for team squads that would be realistic across a 20+ round season?
One thing I read yesterday is that up to 150 players could be cut from lists at the end of the season because it's expected there'll be reduced list numbers going forward and to allow for some fresh faces to each club
The quickest cut would most likely be the rookie list and cap team lists at 38 - senior lists have been allowed to be between 38-40 with rookie lists between 4-6 players. Losing just 6 players per club is 108 players across the league who will be gone.
With the draft the rules have been a minimum of 3 picks, but I wouldn't be surprised to see that scrapped with instead of a minimum of 2 picks this year - and that's another 36-54 players gone if some teams take 3 picks
I think you are right, there will be changes coming at the end of all this.Its not only numbers its dollars..I can remember when lists were over 50 , there seemed no limit to them , anyone in the 2nds could play firsts... so its not purely numbers its what players are paid.
One might make a case for a few different outcomes. 16 a side for example. 32 on the list who knows. The will know what they have to do till the know the damage. If they have to take a 500M line of credit.. they will have to create a method to pay that off over the next 10 years yet create product for the media that gives max revenue. I think it the middle their that will suffer. Clubs will find a way to keep their most valuable and they will want to keep the best kids.
One can look thru the Geelong list and I suspect we could name 5 to 10 players that would be in cross hairs IF all contracts get ripped up. The average player payment atm is close to 400G ... that has to drop back into the 200's. The top players now will struggle with pay well short of 1M
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Keep pick 11 and pick up the kid they took as DFAIF GC fold, do we still get pick 11 or whatever the equivalent would be?
I'm expecting that if we do have a draft at the end of the year that it's going to look a lot different to what we're used to

Can I pick who is in the cross hairsIts not only numbers its dollars..I can remember when lists were over 50 , there seemed no limit to them , anyone in the 2nds could play firsts... so its not purely numbers its what players are paid.
One might make a case for a few different outcomes. 16 a side for example. 32 on the list who knows. The will know what they have to do till the know the damage. If they have to take a 500M line of credit.. they will have to create a method to pay that off over the next 10 years yet create product for the media that gives max revenue. I think it the middle their that will suffer. Clubs will find a way to keep their most valuable and they will want to keep the best kids.
One can look thru the Geelong list and I suspect we could name 5 to 10 players that would be in cross hairs IF all contracts get ripped up. The average player payment atm is close to 400G ... that has to drop back into the 200's. The top players now will struggle with pay well short of 1M
Hold the 2020 draft order for the 2020-21 super draft? Wouldn't say no to having 3 picks in the top 20 where those picks are the equiv of top 10I wouldn’t be surprised if there is no draft and next year becomes an under 19 comp. Giving this years and next years 18 yr old a whole year to impress.
It wouldn’t be fair on the current new recruits to be cut before they have at the very least played in the vfl to show what they can do.
By how many would be the interesting part. If you drop the list numbers by a handful probably doesn't help us, but if you cut by 10 then we'd be in a position to look at say, the 35th best GWS player and whether they fit our best 34what would be interesting if they cut list sizes
3 first rounders in a super draft? Death riding a WCE outfit missing NicNat and Kennedy at a minimum? Yes please
Don't shoot me! I just posted it.
Don't shoot me! I just posted it.
no doubt we need cameron and will offer him big $ but I doubt he leaves gws.
Don't shoot me! I just posted it.
He would also be OOC at the Giants and they'd be looking to shed cap. He might find that he's offered half what he would have been offered last year by all partiesWhat problems? The no money problem? I don't think a very expensive acquisition would help with that.