Query:
If it comes to the crunch that O Henry nominates for the ND, does that then tie him into a 2 year contract?
If it comes to the crunch that O Henry nominates for the ND, does that then tie him into a 2 year contract?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Port has pick 10??Sav is the best up and coming backman we want pick 10 for Sav
They got other Future picks in to counter the Fr2 and Fr3 they traded out so it is like they just traded their Fr1Weird. I thought the AFL said no to Port giving away all its Future picks? What changed?
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Looks like norf got bent over
Any other club swapping 1 for 2 and 3 would be a win in my books. And Ports f1 next year could be good too because I don't rate Port.
I just expect they waste this to be honest.
Query:
If it comes to the crunch that O Henry nominates for the ND, does that then tie him into a 2 year contract?
Query:
If it comes to the crunch that O Henry nominates for the ND, does that then tie him into a 2 year contract?
West Coast too. The hell are they doing?Looks like norf got bent over
That is exactly the scenario.
I think we've reached the limit of our assistance ....... and patience with Collingwood. Those picks to them and we get something back, but I'm not even convinced we need / or want something back. Not like I think we'll use it.
People in here just need to accept that if it gets the Henry deal done then it doesn't really matter. Geelong would have let Sav go for a wink and a nudge anyway.
Touted as... What Selwood had was intangible. Selwood was a great midfielder, but never the best midfielder of an era. Selwood was the best Captain and that was because - he was who he was, he was brought up in a successful team with great Captains and leaders, he tasted success early and then it was ongoing, he had great support from coaches and from team mates. It was a goldilocks situation where the sum of all parts was greater than each individually. Selwood at another team would not have been as great.He's been touted as the next Joel Selwood... 2 or 3 is a bargain. Should be Numero Uno
Query:
If it comes to the crunch that O Henry nominates for the ND, does that then tie him into a 2 year contract?
Excellent, thank you!!No he gets to specify the conditions of the contract
Don't even reckon he needs to say that. He's made it clear he wants to play alongside his brother. Any team in the ND would know where he wants to beIf Collingwood reject that then it’s time for OH to step up and say he wants Geelong and no one else.
I think offering 25 & 33 is reasonable. Makes us look genuine and between that and the Krueger trade it sits about right. If Collingwood reject that then it’s time for OH to step up and say he wants Geelong and no one else.
West Coast too. The hell are they doing?
West Coast too. The hell are they doing?
Excellent, thank you!!
So if he nominates the ND, states a 1 yr contract
My next query, would that constitute 2 contracts & becomes an unrestricted free agent?
Probably because it's all pre-arranged and everything is queued to be released based on the media cycle and designed to keep maximum interest and attention.So why did we do the 25 trade if 25 didn't get us Henry? It seemed a very purposeful trade but now I'm struggling to understand the purpose.
I think offering 25 & 33 is reasonable. Makes us look genuine and between that and the Krueger trade it sits about right. If Collingwood reject that then it’s time for OH to step up and say he wants Geelong and no one else.
Ah crap, would have been a nice way to get him for the price of a mars barNo not a free agent
There's no guarantee that Clarkson starts (or finishes) his tenure at North. You have to feel for North, as they just can't seem to take a trick.I just have doubts on Norths ability to create a winning culture. Even getting Clarkson I had Norths ceiling of success at MAYBE a PF if they were lucky. Its a poorly run club, s**t facilities, small crowds, constantly sent to places like Tassie to play, and if you are talented after a few years you will get the option to go to a bigger club if you want.
Can't wait to see what careers North torch with picks 2 and 3.
I can't see Geelong throwing Henry under the bus it's not the way we have rolled.24 + 33 for Ollie Henry seems like a lot to give away for a player we don't really need. I'd rather swap them for a future late first for 2023 or two early 2nd rounds for 2023. At least we'd have something to take to next years draft to trade for a key position player.
Got it. Thanks!They got other Future picks in to counter the Fr2 and Fr3 they traded out so it is like they just traded their Fr1
After Ashcroft & Cadman...
Those mids ranked by Deore, Twomey etc etc... are all the same Tsatas/Clark/Wardlaw/MacKenzie/Phillipou/Hewitt/Humphrey.
Throw a blanket over them. Tsatas can go 2 or 3 or slip to 6 TBH.
Humphrey could go 3 based on his upside even Wardlaw could and probably should slip to 7-10 mark with his inability to get over a succession of hamstring strains.
WC want Buss?? Hewitt?? Do they think we want Buss, might trick them to pony up something ?
Yeah not sure.
FWIW i think Cadman is a beauty for a big forward that has a few strings to his bow.