Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
It also undersells the number of times we had major players off the ground injured early in games.You've misinterpreted what that means. In any given week for around half of the season (in total), 6 (let's say 9 was an exagerration although it was around 9 for a month) best 22 players were missing. A different combination each week.
cats_09 had a nice table, although I think it was 2022 premiership players only. I can go through and do this for you if you are keen because you're right, I may have gotten it wrong to the exact number.
And we all know a few players were playing quite injured for a while. Look at all those early surgeries when we finally waved the white flag.
Time to start rectifying some myths.
Dangerfield: more coaches votes and Brownlow votes this year than last, just had an awkwardly timed rib break/lung puncture.
Hawkins: goal/assist average were both above career averages and close to 2022.
Stengle, SDK and Holmes are young with big ceilings and could easily bounce back. Ceglar was always irrelevant. Stanley/Blicavs will remain a solid combo. Bruhn is borderline as a potential break out player and Guthrie returns as our two time BnF midfielder. Duncan should be able to slot back and replace Tuohy's half back drive (leaving Holmes and Dempsey/Knevitt etc for the wings). We do need a Bews replacement - let's hope one of the Irish boys can step up.
We had 6-9 best 22 players missing half the season and usually a few of them were very important ones. It's a ridiculous overreaction to write us off when our having a best 18-19 out of 22 had us beating Melbourne, Port, Adelaide, Bulldogs (first time) etc.
Very good point. We had the most, and earliest, enforced substitutions of any side in the league this season. And we usually ran out of gas in the last quarter of these games.It also undersells the number of times we had major players off the ground injured early in games.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
This misses the point though. The fact that we were forced to field more injured players than usual, and couldn't manage the senior players like in 2022, is not necessarily an expected outcome for 2024. If we get even a little mean reversion on that and in-game injuries that's probably +2 wins on the scorecard just from that.I was actually amazed to see that DeKoning only missed 4 games. Felt like more.
Either way though, if you cross the line you're fit. And should be judged as such. Opposition players get zero sympathy for playing with niggles or injuries (as they should), same should go for us. If the depth is as strong as we're told it is, they should have rested Cameron and whoever else when they needed to, not once the season was blown.
This misses the point though. The fact that we were forced to field more injured players than usual, and couldn't manage the senior players like in 2022, is not necessarily an expected outcome for 2024. If we get even a little mean reversion on that and in-game injuries that's probably +2 wins on the scorecard just from that.
I don't think any player on our list fell off because they were less motivated- less optimistic, more nervous of injury or recurrence of injury, impacted by injury makes a lot more sense for professional athletes. There were games that certain players didn't look themselves and for most it was a case of carrying injury. As much as we'd love to throw all the kids in, this hinders their development when not ready or underdone.The major issue for our poor performance this year was being unfit and unmotivated. Yes, injuries contributed - losing C.Guthrie for pretty much the whole season particularly hurt with Joel's retirement - but it was pretty obvious that the fire in the belly wasn't there.
Isaac Smith is a client of the company where my daughter works and he told them in early March not to expect much from the Cats for the first part of the season because they had partied so hard and had such a delayed start to the preseason. It showed!The biggest issue I think for our season was our dismal preparation off the Premiership. Standards dropped.
A Premier often flys the gates with confidence and connection, but we were not ready.
Can they re-discover that hunger? Or is it gone, like Richmond or worse, West Coast.
I couldn’t say with any confidence.
Should Geelong try and convince Esava to stay?Does the AFL have a demographic problem. With only 70 odd new players being drafted each year are we starting to see signs of with clubs rushing to lock in even mediocre talent.
Pick 28 aint pick 28 though is it.I'd take that in a heartbeat.
What do we reckon? 7 + 28 to the draft? Nate Caddy + George Stevens would make for an exciting few years in the future.
Or do we trade for the Dogs 10 + 17 and take 10, 17 & 28 to the draft? Could be an injection of youth that really changes the landscape for us ala Port 2018.
Shadow89 this seems right up your alley, that future side could be looking pretty special in a month or so!!
Likely a factor and yes it can be rectified. It would be more worrying if preparation was perfect and we performed as we did. Upside.The biggest issue I think for our season was our dismal preparation off the Premiership. Standards dropped.
A Premier often flys the gates with confidence and connection, but we were not ready.
Can they re-discover that hunger? Or is it gone, like Richmond or worse, West Coast.
I couldn’t say with any confidence.
Isaac Smith is a client of the company where my daughter works and he told them in early March not to expect much from the Cats for the first part of the season because they had partied so hard and had such a delayed start to the preseason. It showed!
We should hold firm on a 1st rounder for Rat. He is exactly what they need. He will restructure their defence and make it that much better... We should play hardball...
Getting a pick in the 20s for a guy out of contract is not a terrible result.
I liken it to the Alan Christensen trade.. we thought that getting pick 21 was a bit average for him, but it netted us (premiership ruckman) Rhys Stanley. Christensen went on to achieve precisely what after playing in a flag with us?
Sometimes we're not looking at bigger pictures here.
Yeah Naughton on big $$$, Bont surely on big $$$, English after next season will command big $$$, JUH after next season will command big $$$ and Smith after next season will also command big $$$.Western bulldogs may have screwed their cap. Time to throw big money at Jamarra. I would offer R1 and F1 for him
Both JUH and Smith have links to us as well. I personally would rather JUH. Could build a forwardline around him.Yeah Naughton on big $$$, Bont surely on big $$$, English after next season will command big $$$, JUH after next season will command big $$$ and Smith after next season will also command big $$$.
Very hard to see them keeping them all.
Ahhh they should just trade JUH or Smith now and hook us up.
Let's see what Collingwood produce next year. Right now you'd have them as flag favourites for 2024 - as many did Geelong for 2023. Back to back is not easy as history shows.Likely a factor and yes it can be rectified. It would be more worrying if preparation was perfect and we performed as we did. Upside.
Richmond had too many players fall off a cliff, and their senior players didn't last the distance like ours have.
Pick 28 aint pick 28 though is it.
That selection will be over 30 by the end of the weekend after free agency and on the draft night it will be in the mid to high 30s. Picks (for points) don’t start evaporation until after that point ( the sweet spot of value - late 30s & 40s) and there is still only 45-50 players taken.
Respectfully have to disagree that lord is a more exciting prospect than O Henry. Henry has much better exposed form, and has a far greater upside.Just my opinion but O Lord - but i think theres more upside - more to get excited about as a footballer than O Henry
Because Lord is lightning quick and he is 6ft 5inc
And when he kicked the 4 goals in that final - he did stuff that only really good players could do - and he has the physical attributes to do it - like a turn of foot
As others have said it is a very lack lustre - boring trade period for the Cats this off season - however Geel can turn that on their head - if O Lord is running around in the hoops next year
Personally i think Pt AAde would have to have rocks in their head to let him go/trade him out- but stranger things have happened