On the Swans board yesterday Wheresbuddy posted a team of former GWS players who are now with other clubs
B Wilson Corr Frost
HB Williams Marchbank Tomlinson
C Shiel Steele Treloar
HF Smith Cameron Hoskin-Elliott
F Langdon Lobb Finlayson
Foll Phillips Adams Kennedy
Res Caldwell Hately Bonar Setterfield
and it got me thinking about how there is surely no other team in the competition at the moment that could be realistically beaten by a team of their former players. Add Hopper and Taranto to the above team and the 2023 GWS team would not have a chance.
It is clearly a bad thing that so many quality players from GWS have left that there is enough of them to form their own team and that team would beat the current GWS but I was wondering what could be done to fix this as surely it is in the AFL's best interest to fix this.
Right now one of a few things happen. GWS pick up a high draft pick player who leaves after a few years, or who GWS manage to convince to stay but only after paying them way over what they are actually worth. Guys like Kelly and Whitfield are on so much that they are de-stabilising the GWS cap. GWS can't convince first round draft pick players to stay unless they are paid way overs.
Obviously the AFL would not like this as GWS can't grow as a club if they are in a constant never ending rebuild due to players leaving, so with that in mind what can be done about it? What do you think GWS or the AFL (or both) should do to try and combat this?
Now I am going to offer a suggestion here that I know will likely not be hugely popular but I think the AFL need to give GWS back their original zones for the Acadmey. A number of years ago they got a few really good players in a row from the Riverina area, and Collingwood and a few others managed to lobby to get certain parts of the Riverina removed from GWS's zone. I think these areas need to be reinstated. GWS need to bring in players who are less likely to leave and if they are from NSW then it does mean they are probably more likely to stay. It is why clubs like Gold Coast and GWS when they are terrible lose players, and a lot of players but when Carlton and Melbourne were bad they did not lose that many players, it is because when a club is bad players want to go home more, but with Melbourne and Carlton their players were already home, while for GWS most of their players are not from NSW.
Also like David King said just today, and I can't believe I am agreeing with him but first round draft pick players need to be given longer initial contracts. I am not saying 4 years like King suggested but I do think a 3 year contract is more healthy and helpful for clubs like GWS than a 2 year contract.
What would you do to fix the situation at GWS where they are losing player after player every year?
B Wilson Corr Frost
HB Williams Marchbank Tomlinson
C Shiel Steele Treloar
HF Smith Cameron Hoskin-Elliott
F Langdon Lobb Finlayson
Foll Phillips Adams Kennedy
Res Caldwell Hately Bonar Setterfield
and it got me thinking about how there is surely no other team in the competition at the moment that could be realistically beaten by a team of their former players. Add Hopper and Taranto to the above team and the 2023 GWS team would not have a chance.
It is clearly a bad thing that so many quality players from GWS have left that there is enough of them to form their own team and that team would beat the current GWS but I was wondering what could be done to fix this as surely it is in the AFL's best interest to fix this.
Right now one of a few things happen. GWS pick up a high draft pick player who leaves after a few years, or who GWS manage to convince to stay but only after paying them way over what they are actually worth. Guys like Kelly and Whitfield are on so much that they are de-stabilising the GWS cap. GWS can't convince first round draft pick players to stay unless they are paid way overs.
Obviously the AFL would not like this as GWS can't grow as a club if they are in a constant never ending rebuild due to players leaving, so with that in mind what can be done about it? What do you think GWS or the AFL (or both) should do to try and combat this?
Now I am going to offer a suggestion here that I know will likely not be hugely popular but I think the AFL need to give GWS back their original zones for the Acadmey. A number of years ago they got a few really good players in a row from the Riverina area, and Collingwood and a few others managed to lobby to get certain parts of the Riverina removed from GWS's zone. I think these areas need to be reinstated. GWS need to bring in players who are less likely to leave and if they are from NSW then it does mean they are probably more likely to stay. It is why clubs like Gold Coast and GWS when they are terrible lose players, and a lot of players but when Carlton and Melbourne were bad they did not lose that many players, it is because when a club is bad players want to go home more, but with Melbourne and Carlton their players were already home, while for GWS most of their players are not from NSW.
Also like David King said just today, and I can't believe I am agreeing with him but first round draft pick players need to be given longer initial contracts. I am not saying 4 years like King suggested but I do think a 3 year contract is more healthy and helpful for clubs like GWS than a 2 year contract.
What would you do to fix the situation at GWS where they are losing player after player every year?





