BluesKreuz
Senior List
Both Players seem to have gone to another level this year, who is the better player?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Log in to remove this Banner Ad
The only thing Watson has on Pendlebury is leadership. Anyone voting for Watson is extremely Bias
I love Watson, think he epitomises what football is all about, but Pendlebury is in the top 3 if not the best midfielder in the game.
I'd love to have Watson at the pies but Pendlebury is the better player.
(Also Paddy love - Pendles is our vice-captain, so he doesn't lack leadership, but will probably never be the leader Watson is, so I see your point)
Pendlebury for me. Arguably the best midfielder in the game right now.
In my honest opinion:
Swan is made to look better by his side
Pendlebury would star no matter which side he was in
In my honest opinion:
Swan is made to look better by his side
Pendlebury would star no matter which side he was in
Don't be silly.
Seriously, Dane Swan would perform to the elite level in any side.
It's debatable as to who is better between Swan and Pendles but to suggest Swan is made to look better by his side when he is arguably the premier mid in his side is utter rubbish.
3 BnFs, back2back AA, dominates almost every statistical category in the comp and simply cannot be beaten by a tag. He is in the top 3-5 mids of the competition if not the best. Pendles is rapidly closing.
Hocking sure kept him quite on Monday.....
Pendlebury easily I love Jobe but realistically to me he is a top 10 Midfielder in the comp at his best. Where as Pendles is a top 1-2.
Did an ok job. Certainly didn't beat him but managed to subdue him a little.
Swan's numbers still read 24 disposals, 4 marks, 7 tackles, 8 clearances, 14 contested possessions 2 inside 50s and 1 goal.
Hockings read 13 disposals, 1 mark, 7 tackles, 3 clearances, 8 contested possessions and 2 inside 50s.
Probably as good a job anyone will do on Swan.