Two years makes sense for Kelly but not sure if GWS would settle just for 2 at this stage.
GWS would settle for 2 years and back themselves in to retain him once those 2 years are up.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Two years makes sense for Kelly but not sure if GWS would settle just for 2 at this stage.
I dont think the club should.The uncertainty affects the playing grouo. Given the size if Kellly's payment other players would be relying on his decision to sort out their own futures.GWS would settle for 2 years and back themselves in to retain him once those 2 years are up.
If the premiership window is considered open in that 2 years then absolutely yes they would and should sign him up.I dont think the club should.The uncertainty affects the playing grouo. Given the size if Kellly's payment other players would be relying on his decision to sort out their own futures.
There are more important issues, whatever a "premiership window" is. With or without Kelly I expects us to be contenders for at least a few years yet, if that's what it means.If the premiership window is considered open in that 2 years then absolutely yes they would and should sign him up.
I dont think the club should.The uncertainty affects the playing grouo. Given the size if Kellly's payment other players would be relying on his decision to sort out their own futures.
It means that if Kelly only wants to stay for 2 years, you keep him for those 2 years if you have a decent chance at a flag. Who cares if he leaves after that if he can help jag a premiership. It will have absolutely paid off regardless of what he does next.There are more important issues, whatever a "premiership window" is. With or without Kelly I expects us to be contenders for at least a few years yet, if that's what it means.
Kelly for Davies-Uniacke?I don't see north giving up LDU for anything, to be honest. He's the highest drafted pick we've had since Daniel Wells in 2002.
It means that if Kelly only wants to stay for 2 years, you keep him for those 2 years if you have a decent chance at a flag. Who cares if he leaves after that if he can help jag a premiership. It will have absolutely paid off regardless of what he does next.
On the flip side, you’d have to convince LDU to move interstate which I believe would harder to sell then theresa may's britex deal.Kelly for Davies-Uniacke?
North supporters say no deal
So Kelly is staying.
So who will Norths use their 'war chest' to land instead?
Yeah you might wanna check the thread. LDU with a first rounder.Kelly for Davies-Uniacke?
North supporters say no deal
You might want to check what he was replaying to;Yeah you might wanna check the thread. LDU with a first rounder.
Bold of some to suggest Kelly would only be interested in another two years at GWS. No reason why he wouldn't want to be a marquee player for that club.
I'm aware. If he already knows he'd rather be at GWS then he may just accept a long term high value contract with them now instead of waiting two years to test the water. Very presumptuous to assume he is still hanging out for free agency.Another 2 years gives him FA status and can pick any club/contract, including staying at GWS.
And that's a good thing for us?Another 2 years gives him FA status and can pick any club/contract, including staying at GWS.
And that's a good thing for us?
Don't recall saying it was, but I'd imagine if it came down to another two years or trade him now GWS would rather keep him.
That’s exactly what The Bont has done. Doesn’t mean they’ll move. It makes sense for any player to keep their options open and improves their bargaining position in the future. It’s a short career.Doesnt want to sign up long term, clearly gone when hes a FA.