It's a top 50. Not a top 500.
As a supporter of the club that gave us Terry Domburg, I would just be quiet if I were you.
* The characters in this post are non-fictional.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
It's a top 50. Not a top 500.
That was a mere tongue in cheek comment. I like Tim.As a supporter of the club that gave us Terry Domburg, I would just be quiet if I were you.
* The characters in this post are non-fictional.
Looks to be both. Some players are clearly projected and others are clearly on the back of last year.Is this a projection (S Darcy could be justified) or a retrospective (might explain Danger)?
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Oh, I agree that at present Treacy is not in the top 50. End of season, he may be there.Oh yeah, I wasn't endorsing Cornes whole list or anything.
But there were 10 genuine forwards in the 2024 AA squad of 44 (Treacy wasn't one of them). So let's say there's 11 or 12 in a top 50. Treacy for me was on the outer fringe of that at best. Not certifiably locked in to the point his exclusion was really notable.
If he improves just a bit this year, which he should, then he'll probably sneak in.
It's pretty hard to select a 50 that doesn't differ from everyone else's 50.
That was a mere tongue in cheek comment. I like Tim.
I see Terry played for us in 1980, a rather forgettable year, not that I was even around back then to witness that year in footy thankfully!


Let's be honest, these media guys do these lists to invoke responses and conjecture.Starting from a position of stating your criteria and the relative values you see in different player characteristics might be helpful.
Is it the best 50 players as at when the last games were played?
Your predicted best 50 this season?
The 50 most valuable if the players were all spilled into a hypothetical draft?
The 50 best careers to date?
The 50 best based on relevant form say over the last 3 seasons?
The 50 most impressive players visually?
The 50 most valuable players for making their team win/improving its performance?
The 50 most likely to play the best when the stakes are highest and/or against the best opposition?
The 50 most likely to dominate a random opponent?
All these criteria would yield different results. People will say they consider all of these things together. But there needs to be some sort of statement as to weightings given to all of these things.
Let's be honest, these media guys do these lists to invoke responses and conjecture.
It's got everyone here talking about who they would have differently, and that was the aim.
Kane has a different take in that he is a non Victorian pundit, and the Vic pundits rarely watch a game outside of Vic, and certainly don't value players in interstate clubs the same way.
How many times have you heard the same Vic talking heads saying "if he played for a Victorian team he would be far more heralded"?
So, you will see a bigger group of interstate players on Kane's list than you would on Robbos or Kingys, or Eddie's.
I know AFL "journos" are bad but are they really that bad that they don't even watch any interstate games?Let's be honest, these media guys do these lists to invoke responses and conjecture.
It's got everyone here talking about who they would have differently, and that was the aim.
Kane has a different take in that he is a non Victorian pundit, and the Vic pundits rarely watch a game outside of Vic, and certainly don't value players in interstate clubs the same way.
How many times have you heard the same Vic talking heads saying "if he played for a Victorian team he would be far more heralded"?
So, you will see a bigger group of interstate players on Kane's list than you would on Robbos or Kingys, or Eddie's.
no hes just a stock standard ruckman on a terrible team so he gets a lot of hitouts lolDid xerri retire last night?
looolno hes just a stock standard ruckman on a terrible team so he gets a lot of hitouts lol
ball goes back to the middle a lot, ball movement is crap so your players get tackled and the ball goes up a lot - hope that helpsloool
not sure how that helps him get hitouts but sure
lolball goes back to the middle a lot, ball movement is crap so your players get tackled and the ball goes up a lot - hope that helps
lol
so you are essentially saying there are more centre ball ups in north games?
and that there are more stoppages in north games
someone fact check this pls
futher, Xerri is the only ruckman in the top 17 players for clearances a game, think thats a sign of a poor ruckman tbh. Get it to the mids who will make an effective clearance.lol
so you are essentially saying there are more centre ball ups in north games?
and that there are more stoppages in north games
someone fact check this pls
lol your link doesn't show anything about total stoppages![]()
Northmelb, sydney and ST Kilda only teams with 1 ruck listed too
edit: fact checked myself
There's what, 9 games a weekend? I don't know anyone that watches them all.I know AFL "journos" are bad but are they really that bad that they don't even watch any interstate games?
lol your link doesn't show anything about total stoppages
wonder how he made the AA squad of [emoji640][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]]]

