I still think the majority of possessions on the wing are ground ball gets and English might be exploited by smaller players with more agility and acceleration.I made no slip up. 2010 was season 1 for Gawn, having been drafted in 2009. The numbers I reference were 2015 for Gawn when he first received the ruck mantle. He was terrific then already, but only played the 13 games, earning his spot during the second half of the season. Gawn's 2015 numbers were excellent with 2016 largely a full season of the same thing with only incremental improvements.
Suggesting English gets crushed for hitouts isn't news and I don't view it in isolation as a fair metric to judge him on solely.
You don't have a thing to complain about regarding thorough answering of the question when I reference both the fourth and fifth seasons of Grundy and Gawn to both satisfy your own question in its entirety and provide greater insight and analysis for those who desire it both regarding hitouts and the relevant metrics that indicate competitiveness.
I can't speak for others, but I find myself comparing guys of the same age to one another rather than the year they join the AFL system. And I look back directly not at how many years in the system but rather use age as my preferred method for comparison. It's like if looking for a Tim Kelly or Tom Stewart comparison. You don't compare them to guys in their drafts, they're entirely different ages. It's instead looking at guys at the same age or when guys were at that age to determine how effective or otherwise they are.
I don't view ruckmen as effective in their role if they don't show competence in hitouts/hitouts to advantage/contested possessions/clearances/centre clearances/tackles/pressure acts. The better the combination of those, the better the ruckman. There are too many contests in a given game they're involved in for them not to be at least reasonable in those areas of the game by position. Contested marks, intercept marks, marks i50 and goals kicked add substantial value to quality of play/output, but it's not without those other aspects on its own enough to make someone a good ruckman.
English as a ruckman in my view is a modern Josh Fraser. Great around the ground and still a respectable enough ruckman, but gets exploited by the stronger ruckman at stoppages. Josh Fraser just like English I feel would have had an even better career had he been more of a wing/hff who can play relieving ruck minutes but it isn't his main gig.
I'm not the coach or list manager, and I'm aware the Dogs don't have the personnel to replace English through the ruck, but I'd be making it my number one priority for the Dogs in the offseason as a method of creating a unique competitive advantage on matchday.
The perception with wings that they need to be fast I don't consider to be a pre-requisite. I look at it as a misnomer if anything. I view it most as a bonus. It's more a position that is about endurance, accumulation and skills. And if contested marking, intercept marking and scoreboard impact are further weapons they're major bonuses. English probably would be only a moderate accumulator at his position and skills reasonable without being incredible, but he ticks those other boxes and the contested marking, intercept marking and scoreboard impact categories he could be elite by position.
HFF I would consider equally good for English with the usage as per your thinking. Wing/HFF with relieving ruck minutes is how I see him maximised. Whether he's pushing forward or back, he reads it so well and has really developed his contested marking to an excellent level with his clean hands overhead and much improved capacity to mark v contact. And in either role he could do all that and no one would be able to stop him or limit his impact.
Not that English is the only guy in the competition I consider being played out of position/being used in a suboptimal position, but he seems the relevant one of the day and the one I'd probably consider to be among if not the greatest missed opportunity. Or at least in my mind when I go through the totality of his game and what he brings to the table.
Comparing English's stats this year to other players previous years is going to be skewed by the shorter quarters. Obviously nothing can be done about that but worth noting.
Looking at where English sits among ruckman this year in the stats you have highlighted as being important:
5th for contested possessions
12th for hitouts (I think a pointless stat)
11th for hitouts to advantage
10th for center clearances
10th for total clearances
17th for tackles
6th for pressure acts
So not really bad figures for a player in his 4th year.
Anyway I'm sure most watchers of your thread are not interested in Tim English so I'll drop it now. Thanks for your thoughts