I'm not bagging him (it does sound kinda negative on review, but I do rate him a top-5 prospect from pretty much any year) - but as others have said, exactly where will he fit in an AFL side (when his physical advantages aren't as prominant). He is allready on the elite side in terms of desperation/2nd/3rd efforts, so improvement will only come from experience/physical development.
I'm not really a draft-watcher, but this quote from a neutral observer pretty much sums up the debate for me.
When people analyse Kreuzer, they end up saying thinks like "I'm not trying to bag him, but now that you mention it, my review does sound a little negative". Even people who rate him top 5 see obvious flaws; not to mention that no-one seems convinced as to where he will actually play football.
His stand-out attributes as an AFL player seem to be stamina and second-effort. Does that make him essentially the rich mans Ian Prendergast? An undersized ruckman with average tap-work, who is a great athlete and has good second efforts, but never really finds a niche in the aFL. Really? We're going to pass up a player who seems to fit somewhere between Deledio and Judd, for the rich mans Ian Prendergast? I'm absolutely stunned by this...




