Janus
Advocatus Diaboli
- Joined
- Sep 9, 2007
- Posts
- 23,430
- Reaction score
- 57,318
- Location
- Kansas City, Missouri
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Dallas Cowboys, Chicago Bulls
Hombsch is significantly better than O'Shea at every facet of football other than fitness.
Somebody's forgotten how good he can be when Carlile and Trengove are in the side and he's freed up to play help defence rather than focusing on stopping the opposition's best KPF. Give me Hombsch as a 'mobile tall patrolling the backline' over O'Shea every day of the week. O'Shea will be lucky if he's even on our list next season, let alone displacing our best defender.
O'Shea also has top end speed, which is why he's better suited to defending a wider area of the ground. I'm not sure Hombsch is fast enough to play that particular role, which is purely to act as support for the other two flankers in Pittard and Broadbent (or whoever), because you have to be able to get from one side to the other pretty fast to cover a switch through the middle of the ground. If he is, or Carlile is, great - dump O'Shea and play one of them in that space and keep the other in deep defence.
I know exactly how good Hombsch can be, which is why I'm not limiting him to a secondary role. He plays the same role as O'Shea but on the last line of defence rather than the third to last line (Westhoff and Trengove being the second to last line). Like I said, if some other defender has the top end speed plus endurance of O'Shea, by all means kick him out. But mobility is the key to modern team defense, IMO. No use being the best defender of you can't get to the contest.



