I'm very consistent on that front.
Clearly this poor fellow was obviously too traumatized & triggered by that poster of George....It's almost as if he had an obsession with it & was magnetically drawn to it in such a way, that he had to go out of his way to deface it; So as to stave off it's magnetic affect upon his psyche.
My bet is that George was triggering some naughty & unholy feelings within said perp, to such a degree that he just couldn't cope or was unable avert his eyes whenever he saw it....That's right....Our perp has deeply suppressed homo-erotic feelings & his super-ego - in order to cope with them - couldn't help but bedaub that demon with his religious veil of nay-say.
. .
The Liberals spent roughly $100m to do what Labor did two years ago at their conference, allow a conference vote. This is what I don't understand about your point, yes Malcolm's survey removed the final blockage to SSM, but you cannot deny that the blockage he removed was his own party's official opposition to the notion. Labor has been ready to go for two years on this waiting for the Libs to catch up.
How small minded and stupid we will look 50 - 100 years from now ! #loveislove
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
Well based on your story of not taking the Census seriously, and my personal experience of taking it seriously, that must mean that at the very least half the Census data is accurate...am I doing it right with the anecdotes?
It’s a lot easier to have social change policies in opposition than in government. The ALP had there chance. They blew it.
They did, although I would argue public opinion was more evenly split four years ago when the ALP were last in government, it's a credit to the marriage equality lobby to get the community to where it is now in recent years particularly among lay-Catholics where two thirds are in favour of marriage equality. Importantly, the ALP evolved without the need to waste money on a survey. The Libs after throwing all this money away have only just caught up to the rest of parliament. Now the ALP can finally implement their policy of a conscience vote as their members were elected to do.
The census data tells us that there is a significant Muslim populace in the vast majority of electorates which returned no votes and evidence also showed that Muslims were highly likely to vote no. Yet you still have a resistance to state the obvious and cannot come to terms with the fact that Muslims are highly anti SSM and voted against it.
The above statement is ironic. You say you will take the census figures as gospel and won't look at things without any evidence behind them, yet you completely ignore and dismiss the evidence which shows the fact that Muslim electorates were overwhelmingly anti ssm and cannot bear to bring yourself to say they were the reason the no vote won in virtually all electorates which it did.
Please the particular poster you are referring to is way to naive and closed minded to actually open his eyes and realise that the results of an official activity like the census may not be accurate or many not depict the true state of something. This is unfortunately the state of many teachers today who are either too scared or too ignorant to believe that the world may be different to how they think.
Click on the poster's username; then click
