New Dream Team Approach- Lowest Score Wins!

[swans4eva]

I was wondering whether anyone had ever thought of the idea of having a competition where you have to make a dream team that scores the lowest. Of course you might say just fill it with 75k and 86k players but if you had a rule where you had to be within 50k of your salary it could work
People's thoughts? It is all hypothetical I guess

 

[Lakey91]

Ive thought about it! Ive also thought about a DT game where the lowest Team value wins - you have to try and pick the premiums/mid pricers who are going to lose you cash. You pick high averaging players likely to get tagged something chronic after a good year, etc. Evidently you would also have to avoid the rookies...

Silly idea, but I think it would be interesting!

Surely if you are thinking about this, you truly are a DT addict!

 

[swans4eva]

Surely if you are thinking about this, you truly are a DT addict!

Yes that and being plain bored without AFL.

This is the most annoying part of the AFL year, early December to end of January, Draft and trade week have passed, Nab cup hasn't arrived, dream team hasn't opened... It will be good when Febuary arrives

 

[Atavistic]

We could have a comp whereby the team that picks up the most injured players wins some sort of prize for absolute failure. That could be fun.

 

[clivenator26]

me and somemates did itfor finals dt, the rules where though that you had to field 22 playing players, it would be arderto do that over the H & A season but if you can be bothered i am sure it could be done.

 

[Deledio2Conca]

You could do it and still have all the 80k players and whatever, but for every player that gets a zero in your starting 22, you get 100 points.

 

[Thumpy]

I think it would be a good idea for the NAB cup. Just a bit of fun before the real season starts

RULES:
# lowest overall score wins the competition
# players are priced at their average for the upcoming season
# must be at least 50k within the salary cap
# all players on the ground must be playing
# any donuts are punished with +100 points

 

[Clonkers]

If lowest score won, then PRESTI would be like the Gablett of supercoach

 

[The Falcon Strike]

Ive thought about it! Ive also thought about a DT game where the lowest Team value wins - you have to try and pick the premiums/mid pricers who are going to lose you cash. You pick high averaging players likely to get tagged something chronic after a good year, etc. Evidently you would also have to avoid the rookies...

Silly idea, but I think it would be interesting!

Surely if you are thinking about this, you truly are a DT addict!

This is quite a good idea - the whole lowest points thing wouldn't work IMO - but the lowest value would require some good strategy as opposed to everyone just picking lovett, croad etc

 

[Coopers]

I like the idea - must field a team of 22 players that get a game, or you score 100 points. Someone would have to be elected the "leader" of each league to enforce it, and apply the penalty.

 

[Swooper Eagle]

If lowest score won, then PRESTI would be like the Gablett of supercoach

Tate Pears and Chris Tarrant would be captaincy material too. So would Zac Dawson.

 

[BigSledge]

Sellar would become an absolute gem whilst Ablett & Bartel are sitting on the pine!

 

[Virgil]

Tate Pears and Chris Tarrant would be captaincy material too. So would Zac Dawson.

As would David Hale.

 

[CuriousObsession]

Definitely bench of Goddard, Gram, Swan, Ablett, Cox, Sandilands, Riewoldt, Chapman.

What % of Salary Cap is That ???

 

[Coopers]

Definitely bench of Goddard, Gram, Swan, Ablett, Cox, Sandilands, Riewoldt, Chapman.

What % of Salary Cap is That ???

I'd be worried about doing that - you're picking spuds that score lowly - odds on are they won't play 22 games.

Who are you going to put on the field when the coach drops your spuds?