Abletts one of the best contested marks for his size in the comp.One thing that Fyfe & Dangerfield have that Ablett lacks is contested marking ability
Defensively and offensively that's a huge weapon
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Abletts one of the best contested marks for his size in the comp.One thing that Fyfe & Dangerfield have that Ablett lacks is contested marking ability
Defensively and offensively that's a huge weapon
What relevance does it have to you? Not even sure why you responded.
Other than white-knighting for a fellow one-flag wonder.
If you don't like engaging in public discussion, get off bigfooty
I'll always step in to hold a mirror up in front of a small minded campaigner
It's fairly laughable to suggest that Robbie Gray is on par with Dangerfield.
Any Port supporter who suggests it is clearly very biased.
I think you'd struggle to find a unbiased supporter who'd say the same.I'd have Robbie Gray over Dangerfield still for sure..
It's closer these days but it was only halfway through last year that Danger started to lift and dispose the ball more efficiently. Was collosal on the weekend but he has the tendency to drop off in consistency.
You obviously didn't watch enough Crows gamesI think you'd struggle to find a unbiased supporter who'd say the same.
What even is a "social warrior"Pointing out that a d#ckhead is acting like a d#ckhead doesn't equate to being a social warrior in my mind
But happy to wear that hat if you insist
Most people suggesting Robbie is par with Dangerfield in terms of impact on games ITT are not Port supporters. You'd have to watch no Port games to think Dangerfield's impact is so far ahead of Robbie's that it is "laughable" to think one would take Robbie over Dangerfield.I think you'd struggle to find a unbiased supporter who'd say the same.
I think you'd struggle to find a unbiased supporter who'd say the same.
What even is a "social warrior"
And the year before..Think they're about par. Not sure how much of Gray you saw last year?
Dangerfield had more credits than Robbie pre-2014 but obviously Rob had to recover from the injury and was playing in a far inferior system before that.And the year before..
Danger has been behind Gray untill Midway through last year he bursted into another year. Both have just as much impact on a game now.
R. Gray AFLCA Player of the Year 2014, Danger have one of those yet?And the year before..
That is true. Both danger and Fyfe are quite a bit taller than ablett and are able to compete in packs for marks. Ablett was a bit better when he was younger and had more spring but even then he wasn't near fyfes level.I haven't seen Ablett take too many pack marks
I've seen him take marks one on one, but both Dangerfield and Fyfe do that too
I'm talking pack marks to be clearer
Pendlebury does not belong in that group. Despite having great disposal he isn't close in terms of getting the contested ball and driving the ball forward. Danger may not hit players on the chest but he is a big kick and often runs 10 yards with it first. That counts for a lot.
One thing that Fyfe & Dangerfield have that Ablett lacks is contested marking ability
Defensively and offensively that's a huge weapon
My point is, their deficiency in kicking is somewhat compensated by their contested marking ability.
I think the margin is closer than what some are suggesting.
It's fairly laughable to suggest that Robbie Gray is on par with Dangerfield.
Any Port supporter who suggests it is clearly very biased.