Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Interestingly in the Sauce article on afl.com.au it mentions Ricky Henderson needs to play 5 games to trigger a contract for next year. If he stays fit he will manage that comfortably.
I wonder if he can decline that contract and sign elsewhere as a free agent if he desires? Or if its an automatic rollover.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
He can decline. Nicky Dal declined a trigger to move.Interestingly in the Sauce article on afl.com.au it mentions Ricky Henderson needs to play 5 games to trigger a contract for next year. If he stays fit he will manage that comfortably.
I wonder if he can decline that contract and sign elsewhere as a free agent if he desires? Or if its an automatic rollover.
He can decline. Nicky Dal declined a trigger to move.
Nope ....another midget......speedy player, but honestly he again is not the type of player we need
Prestia is a line breaker ......we fixed up that deficiency already at the trade & draft table
I think you can answer that yourselfHuh? He's actually the complete opposite. Prestia is inside contested machine, they don't call him then meatball over there for nothing! He is also very adept on the outside with great skills as it happens. Perfect fit for our midfield, why in the world you wouldn't want to target him is beyond me.
Dal santo declined his trigger to go to kangasInterestingly in the Sauce article on afl.com.au it mentions Ricky Henderson needs to play 5 games to trigger a contract for next year. If he stays fit he will manage that comfortably.
I wonder if he can decline that contract and sign elsewhere as a free agent if he desires? Or if its an automatic rollover.
Another player that doesn't run both ways, just what we need....NOT...Dustin Martin plz
What!!!Nope ....another midget......speedy player, but honestly he again is not the type of player we need
Prestia is a line breaker ......we fixed up that deficiency already at the trade & draft table
That's the whole thing really - he can win contested ball and that is his main strength but also break lines . I'd say hats a positive not a negative . The more traits you have the better in my bookHuh? He's actually the complete opposite. Prestia is inside contested machine, they don't call him then meatball over there for nothing! He is also very adept on the outside with great skills as it happens. Perfect fit for our midfield, why in the world you wouldn't want to target him is beyond me.
The fact that you think he is a "line breaker" and that we have enough of them already, really has me questioning you're judgement and why you are making such ridiculous calls if you don't know? Prestia is nothing like Smith/Seedsman/Henderson etc in the slightest.
Already enough line breakers? So if Dangerfield was available we wouldn'ttake him?Huh? He's actually the complete opposite. Prestia is inside contested machine, they don't call him then meatball over there for nothing! He is also very adept on the outside with great skills as it happens. Perfect fit for our midfield, why in the world you wouldn't want to target him is beyond me.
The fact that you think he is a "line breaker" and that we have enough of them already, really has me questioning you're judgement and why you are making such ridiculous calls if you don't know? Prestia is nothing like Smith/Seedsman/Henderson etc in the slightest.
I think we can do with more contested marking fwd options. We have JJ, Tex is not strong in this area, Gov has potential but we fall off from there.That's the whole thing really - he can win contested ball and that is his main strength but also break lines . I'd say hats a positive not a negative . The more traits you have the better in my book
Plenty of height with our flankers and wings . Not lacking contested marking options up forward
Can't see a problem
Already enough line breakers? So if Dangerfield was available we wouldn'ttake him?
The thing with trading in players is that it's not like going to a nice retail store where you just waltz in and order exactly what design you want, at the exact size, for the exact price you want to pay.
I imagine its really more like a Sunday morning trash and treasure stall. Youre not really sure what you're going to find, and you have to sort through what's there to find what fits - sometimes there might be something you weren't really looking for or don't even really need, but you can't ignore the quality. Or someone's junk might be you're treasure, you just have a bit more imagination.
So maybe a 185cm mid might be perfect, but maybe a 175cm mid is all that's sitting on the table. As long as they work, does it really matter?
It's really about what's there, what's available, and what you can make of it.
I like him as well has a lot of potential as wellJack Steele would be top of my shopping list, pick 24 2014 draft to GWS, Canberra lad so no Victorian go home factor, 187cm 86Kg, not yet a big reputation, tough/hard at it, inside/outside mid that can play forward too...kid is a future gun in waiting. Would gladly give our 1st for him next draft.
And should get the WW seal of approval too......good overhead!!I like him as well has a lot of potential as well
West AdelaideBut they don't have to be midfielders resting there , agree with your point thoughI think we can do with more contested marking fwd options. We have JJ, Tex is not strong in this area, Gov has potential but we fall off from there.