Looks to be about over. Grange 7-13.55 to Noosa 4-7.31
Anyone know how many kids (16-19) Grange played today?
Of the Grange starting 22 today
12 were aged 16-19, with 3 of the 19 yo’s turning 20 this year.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

BigFooty AFLW Notice Img
AFLW 2025 - AFLW Trade and Draft - All the player moves
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Looks to be about over. Grange 7-13.55 to Noosa 4-7.31
Anyone know how many kids (16-19) Grange played today?
Any win against Noosa @ Noosa is a good win. The toughest of road trips.
Good to have community footy back.
What sort of crowd was it
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
SolWell done Grange, the 4 points is all you want.
Billy you’d be pumped, we’re up to page 22..
Solid win for Wilston Grange I thought. More scoring shots and late goals to Noosa. Some in this forum had Noosa unbeatable. Step up in divisions might be harder than we think.Well done Grange, the 4 points is all you want.
Billy you’d be pumped, we’re up to page 22..
I think you are under rating Granges win, and also Noosa making finals in their 1st season as achievements.Good win by Wilston Grange with a young team but let’s here be honest here , if Noosa can’t beat an inexperienced team at Home in trying conditions then they are in for a long year , anyone who had them finish in the Finals doesn’t have much idea about footy.
No disrespect to Noosa but anything above 3rd last will be a good effort in their debut QAFL season
Labrador blooded 9 colts in Reserves at morningside. Had at least 1 colt in 1sts. The way Labrador 1sts played, then reserves was the most sensible place to play the colts as their 1sts looked a hard team to crack into. Grange as youve siad played a lot of youth also. Both coaches are ex AFL players. It will be interesting to see Sherwood and Mt Gravatt sides next week (both coaches ex AFL players also) to see if they also put faith in talented youth? See if its a 'trait'?Of the Grange starting 22 today
12 were aged 16-19, with 3 of the 19 yo’s turning 20 this year.
Live stream of todays game? On Nossas FB there is a post saying..
Noosa Tigers AFC
30 Mar
" The boys from Klinge Scaffold, big thank for supplying scaffold for our TV crew."
.
I didnt see the game but saw some of it on live stream. Congrats to Noosa for a well earnt 1st game in QAFL. I have no doubt they can compete in QAFL but as you stated Noosaboy they will not be allowed lapses as perhaps they could mask a little easier in QFA.Fantastic crowd and atmosphere at noosa yesterday.Just over 2 thousand people signed in which was great considering a pretty ordinary day weather wise.Grange thoroughly deserved their win.They were harder at the contest much cleaner with the footy in hand and showed heaps more discipline than the home side who gave away 10 fifty metre penalties and had two free kicks reversed for ill discipline.Noosa played about 15 minutes of good footy and in this comp certainly won’t get you the points.Hopefully the Easter Saturday game progresses was a big success!
Billy, I am pretty sure both Fletch & Lynny will be selecting the sides they believe will win them games of senior footy in QAFL in 2021. Their respective lists will dictate whether they play youth, seasoned players, or a combination of both leaning either way. I understand the feel good factor about youth but if either coach select youth for the sake of your stats on which clubs are playing youth they should be sacked.Labrador blooded 9 colts in Reserves at morningside. Had at least 1 colt in 1sts. The way Labrador 1sts played, then reserves was the most sensible place to play the colts as their 1sts looked a hard team to crack into. Grange as youve siad played a lot of youth also. Both coaches are ex AFL players. It will be interesting to see Sherwood and Mt Gravatt sides next week (both coaches ex AFL players also) to see if they also put faith in talented youth? See if its a 'trait'?
Noosa will not make the Top 5 this season, you have more chance of catching COVIDI think you are under rating Granges win, and also Noosa making finals in their 1st season as achievements.
We will naturally have a few teenagers as we always do, but it wont be a factor in selection.
I reckon we will have 22 players aged 12-30, great for our club![]()
We will naturally have a few teenagers as we always do, but it wont be a factor in selection.
I reckon we will have 22 players aged 12-30, great for our club![]()
Have a link for that LB?I didnt see the game but saw some of it on live stream. Congrats to Noosa for a well earnt 1st game in QAFL. I have no doubt they can compete in QAFL but as you stated Noosaboy they will not be allowed lapses as perhaps they could mask a little easier in QFA.
Its great that the kids are developing at Grange Judge. It will be exciting to watch this yeari take your point.
Sure, Grange have been pursuing a youth policy with a view to the future, but we’re definitely not playing kids over older guys in the 2’s who would give us a better chance of winning right now.
No coach or footy department in this league is playing with next year (or later) in mind, they want to win this year. If Grange had more “old blokes” who were worthy of a senior spot we’d be picking them.
I dont think anyone suggests promoting young fellas undeservedly. However trial matches are exactly for that; Trialling players at another level to see how they go. Grange and Labrador both have done so exceptionally well, and as a result know more about their list. Im not aware of how many new faces and youth other clubs like Sherwood, Mt Gravatt had a look at? One club promoted just the one kid to look at. A 17yo they believe may get drafted. Thats not trialling the unknown quantities on your list, thats focussing on a pet project.Billy, I am pretty sure both Fletch & Lynny will be selecting the sides they believe will win them games of senior footy in QAFL in 2021. Their respective lists will dictate whether they play youth, seasoned players, or a combination of both leaning either way. I understand the feel good factor about youth but if either coach select youth for the sake of your stats on which clubs are playing youth they should be sacked.
No probs with any of that. But I reckon every single QAFL coach has an extremely good grasp on what standout talent they have in their ranks. If the kid is good enough he is old enoughI dont think anyone suggests promoting young fellas undeservedly. However trial matches are exactly for that; Trialling players at another level to see how they go. Grange and Labrador both have done so exceptionally well, and as a result know more about their list. Im not aware of how many new faces and youth other clubs like Sherwood, Mt Gravatt had a look at? One club promoted just the one kid to look at. A 17yo they believe may get drafted. Thats not trialling the unknown quantities on your list, thats focussing on a pet project.