Remove this Banner Ad

Opinion Round 16 Changes vs. Melbourne

  • Thread starter Thread starter YelloMit
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Lol Pearce got in the best, which game did you watch? He leads the AFL or inside 50's and is an important link up player for us.
Pearce only got in the best players because he got a lot of useless possessions and kicked the sealing goal. Pearce may get a lot of inside 50s but how useful are his kicks.
 
Pearce only got in the best players because he got a lot of useless possessions and kicked the sealing goal. Pearce may get a lot of inside 50s but how useful are his kicks.
Well if your kicking the ball inside 50 your giving your forwards a chance aren't you???
 
Well if your kicking the ball inside 50 your giving your forwards a chance aren't you???
Not if the kick is not to his advantage or 5 metres over his head or one of his terrible shots at goal.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

I'm not with people here. Thought Taberner was quite impressive there tbh considering he's never played there since we drafted him. Shows he can play multiple positions which is fantastic going forward. Probably an out for next week certainly but the only way you can judge Taberner here is positively as 2-3 hours he may have not played defence in his life. Who knows he may have not even played there in juniors. He's an AFL quality KPP without being a star once he reaches his potential, but he's not ready to fulfil it yet.
And Ross said that they only told him this morning that he was back there on Nic Nat and Cox.
 
Pearce only got in the best players because he got a lot of useless possessions and kicked the sealing goal. Pearce may get a lot of inside 50s but how useful are his kicks.

So delist both Taberner and Pearce? Anyone else we should cut whilst we're receiving your pearls of wisdom.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

In: Mora, Mchpharlin (if fit), Griffen, Apeness
out: Sylvia or Pearce, Pavlich, Sandilands, Clarke. Pavlich/Sandi/Clarke i consider needing a rest as we are vsing melbourne
Play Tabs and Apeness as the forwards... i believe Tabs had a decent game considering he is a KPF being played out of position so he deserve another week this time played in the fwd line.
 
Resting too many players might not be the best idea coughstkildacough

in: McPharlin (if fit), Griffen, Mora
out: Sylvia, Clarke (rested), Barlow (rested)

No one's brought up Barlow but he had a slow day for him today, so he might need a week off. Hmm Silvagni should be an in too but just not sure who to put out the side. Glad it's not my job!
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Delist Taberner.

What's worrying is that this is probably completely without tongue in cheek. It's downright disturbing that someone who has posted here for almost 10 years would suggest something like this off the back of today's game.

Lol Pearce got in the best, which game did you watch? He leads the AFL or inside 50's and is an important link up player for us.

I agree with clogged, yes he's leading inside 50's for the comp but do you really think that's a good thing for us? Pearce got a stack of it today but didn't do much with it, he also still treats the footy like a bar of soap.
 
Taberner most likely.
Nah. I said it in the game day thread that today he just proved that he's not a defender but he's willing to give it a crack. I think he deserves another week in the side in a position he's comfortable playing in to see how much he's learned since the Bombers game (that was the last time he played i think)
 
What's worrying is that this is probably completely without tongue in cheek. It's downright disturbing that someone who has posted here for almost 10 years would suggest something like this off the back of today's game.



I agree with clogged, yes he's leading inside 50's for the comp but do you really think that's a good thing for us? Pearce got a stack of it today but didn't do much with it, he also still treats the footy like a bar of soap.
It was mainly tongue in cheek. But I do not rate him that highly.
 
I agree with clogged, yes he's leading inside 50's for the comp but do you really think that's a good thing for us? Pearce got a stack of it today but didn't do much with it, he also still treats the footy like a bar of soap.

Yeah it's certainly reasonable but I think it's more to do with our midfield depth. I'm sure most coaches would have Hill in their top 2 for tagging/run with options so Pearce get's more time and space to find and use the ball. I think we all universally agreed when we picked him up that this was a good thing for this reason. Hilly is clearly a better user of the ball but the chance of Stephen Hill being pretty much let go as a free agent is zero and that's how we got Pearce.

And if not D.Pearce then who would you prefer burst running then delivering it inside 50?

Christ on a bike, one of our best kicks in Mundy nearly missed everything today when he burst from a pack and had a shot on goal. It's not that easy if you're going full tilt.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom