- Banned
- #676
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Daniel has a b/e of 51 & May's b/e is 5 this week. Both have already bottomed out.
His floor increases when Melbourne are good. Ceiling increases when dees are sh*t. 2 best this year, worst two performances for Melbourne. 90-95 avg IMO. With big ones when dees have a stinker.
He's averaging 87 with a 7 floating through his scoring.
103 average without the 7 .. Think you need to bump the average up a little.
He'll go 100+ from here on out IMO
Thanks for that advice..i better grab one this week then...leaning towards daniel but its a 50/50 call.
Wondering if this makes it any more likely that Chapman will miss or not? I want him to miss so I can use him to loop my DEF rookies.
Which is why I had Hunter Clark in my R1 side .....this was the Clubs PS promise .....but the emphasis this year on midfield speed, pushed the slower Clark out of the midfieldIf Ratten plays him fwd/wing like last week or puts him in a few CBs instead of wasting him in defence he can potentially average 95+ or 100+ for the remainder of the year.
But for some reason he likes to waste our most composed player in traffic in the back line when we desperately need him around the ball. It's baffling.
Do you happen to have the goals and behinds for oppo's? Think I saw them somewhere earlierFWIW saw some Ridley and May comparisons earlier as guys were looking to make upgrades.
May 516/5 games un injured = 103.2 average
Ridley 639/5 games un injured = 127.8 average
24 points difference per game..
Ridley has taken 45 kickouts, May has taken 24 .. 21 x4 points per kickout = 84 points.
Puts May at a 120 average with the extra kick outs.. I say this as his % of kickout sharing is very similar to Ridley's, just Melbourne's opposition has been INCREDIBLY accurate lmao (50 behinds) vs Essendon (78 behinds)
This should even up as the year goes on ... Meaning more free points to May heheh, oh and he's 140k cheaper
Good luck with what you choose kenties
I don't think the emphasis on Midfield speed has pushed him out. Unfortunately Steele, Jones and Crouch don't really play multiple positions so that combined with flogging the dead horse Dunstan and other weird CB attendees have kept him out. He played wing/ forward on the weekend and looked very effective.Which is why I had Hunter Clark in my R1 side .....this was the Clubs PS promise .....but the emphasis this year on midfield speed, pushed the slower Clark out of the midfield
It's a pretty big leap of faith to select Hunter Clark now
This is why I started the year with him at D3. Ownership 0.8%118, 91, 90, 103, 91, 100, 36, 115, 110, 149, 102, 58, 122, 123, 117 82, 78, 7, 94, 145
May ^^^
4 non-injury affected scores sub 90 in that 20 game span, 11 tons, 8 of those over 110.
Basically an awesome floor bar the 36 and 58 and has a good ceiling for a 400k defender.
Brayshaw (Robertson & Berg on the ground, Powell & Jordon looped M8)
vs
Bolton (Powell & Jordon on the ground, Robertson & Berg looped F6)
???
I don't think the emphasis on Midfield speed has pushed him out. Unfortunately Steele, Jones and Crouch don't really play multiple positions so that combined with flogging the dead horse Dunstan and other weird CB attendees have kept him out. He played wing/ forward on the weekend and looked very effective.
I wouldn't bring him in now but I started him and am not worried one bit. Am actually bullish if he continues in this role.
Some Mid/Def DPP would be handy right now. May looks like an absolute must have to me at the prices, particularly as I'm running low on cash...
Couple of options
1 - miss out on Frederick, and go early on RCD (or Poulter/Byrnes)
Chapman>May
Berry>RCD
2 - don't go early on a rookie, but miss out on future Kosi price rises
Chapman>May
Kosi>Frederick
3 - wait a week on May, trade Kosi following week
Chapman>Frederick
Gulden>Bolton
Any other ideas out there?
View attachment 1118805
This is why I started the year with him at D3. Ownership 0.8%
fu** you Tommy Hawkins.
He's doing fine scoring wise and can improve IMO..later in the year if needed he can be a luxury trade if we have any left. But won't be a disaster if not.I started with him too, he's had a few poor scores but has also scored 4 tons which isn't a bad return for his price and I'm happy to stick with him.