Admin Notice S35 Rules & Tribunal Thread

[gab213]

Oh yeah that guy. Didn't he retire?

He's a distant relative of Dame Nellie Melba, it's part of his DNA.

 

[NaturalDisaster]

I think there should be an investigation into “Bringing the game into disrepute” charges in this situation.

Especially if it’s found out that Nixi was only created/signed after the OOB’s initially approached Nooks.

How do we know it wasn’t a deliberate plan for Nooks to support the Furies while still moving to his new club

I think we should get a BTGID charge against the Bears for not muzzling you. Can’t always get what we want.

You think, as an ex admin and current LG, I would allow this?

 

[TheInjuryFactory]

What has VeinGlorious Glorious done to deserve such an insult?

Joined me in magnificent, all conquering dark mode splendiferousness.

 

[omgfridge]

I think there should be an investigation into “Bringing the game into disrepute” charges in this situation.

Especially if it’s found out that Nixi was only created/signed after the OOB’s initially approached Nooks.

How do we know it wasn’t a deliberate plan for Nooks to support the Furies while still moving to his new club

Nooks literally posted a media thread which had Nixi joining.

Maybe you should team with hectic cheese productions and get to the bottom of this!

 

[Kennedy Parker]

I think there should be an investigation into “Bringing the game into disrepute” charges in this situation.

Especially if it’s found out that Nixi was only created/signed after the OOB’s initially approached Nooks.

How do we know it wasn’t a deliberate plan for Nooks to support the Furies while still moving to his new club

In this case, the plaintiff would be Kananooks a permanently banned poster on the site, so there's not much point in us wasting time giving him a BTGID charge.

From what I've gathered, the Furies at the time of recruitment would not have known that they were recruiting an alias, they believed that they were recruiting a separate person, only subsequently when Kananooks actually use the Nixi account did they find out.

And the Old Boys, did they purposefully conspire with Nooks to sign him and help him create another account at the time to stay on the Furies' list? They'd have no incentive to do so unless they wish to **** up their own season.

 

[Senor M]

I understand that but in this case, unless you can prove that either team had knowledge of the actual situation I don't see that you can hold them responsible for the player's actions. The examples you gave are administrative failings, this is different in nature.

Losing players due to bans isn’t an administrative failure. If you’ve been in the league for longer than a few moments you’d understand this (considering your teams history with bans).

Both the clubs in question had issues with acquiring 22 players by the submission deadline. Even if they DID know about the alias saga, why would they out themselves at the risk of having their club be punished.

 

[TheInjuryFactory]

Nooks literally posted a media thread which had Nixi joining.

Maybe you should team with hectic cheese productions and get to the bottom of this!

Oh hey, it's the fridge guy from fridge and Nixi

That completely, totally above board and not suss whatsoever tell all!

 

[gab213]

Losing players due to bans isn’t an administrative failure. If you’ve been in the league for longer than a few moments you’d understand this (considering your teams history with bans).

Both the clubs in question had issues with acquiring 22 players by the submission deadline. Even if they DID know about the alias saga, why would they out themselves at the risk of having their club be punished.

I think you're clutching at straws, illustrated by your attempting to use the 'I've been here longer than you, therefore I know more than you' argument and also making a totally irrelevant reference to my team. I'm arguing on the basis only of what makes sense. Being penalised for a mistaken team submission is not the same as what we're discussing.

 

[omgfridge]

Oh hey, it's the fridge guy from fridge and Nixi

That completely, totally above board and not suss whatsoever tell all!

Thanks for reading my media

 

[Senor M]

I think you're clutching at straws, illustrated by your attempting to use the 'I've been here longer than you, therefore I know more than you' argument and also making a totally irrelevant reference to my team. I'm arguing on the basis only of what makes sense. Being penalised for a mistaken team submission is not the same as what we're discussing.

Mate—- you called having too many players suspended an “administrative error”.

It wasn’t a comment about your club, I would have mentioned the Bomber BanGate of a few seasons ago as the clear example no matter who made the comment about multiple players being banned at once.

 

[damicky]

Nooks literally posted a media thread which had Nixi joining.

Maybe you should team with hectic cheese productions and get to the bottom of this!

 

[Senor M]

In this case, the plaintiff would be Kananooks a permanently banned poster on the site, so there's not much point in us wasting time giving him a BTGID charge.

From what I've gathered, the Furies at the time of recruitment would not have known that they were recruiting an alias, they believed that they were recruiting a separate person, only subsequently when Kananooks actually use the Nixi account did they find out.

And the Old Boys, did they purposefully conspire with Nooks to sign him and help him create another account at the time to stay on the Furies' list? They'd have no incentive to do so unless they wish to * up their own season.

Would both clubs have had a valid squad submission if Nixi & Nooks were caught on the eve of the season?

 

[TheInjuryFactory]

Thanks for reading my media

It was pretty, pretty, pretty good. Put HecticCheese promotions or whatever to shame.

Why don't you drop by the TiFmedia offices on Monday and we'll do brunch.

 

[gab213]

Mate—- you called having too many players suspended an “administrative error”.

It wasn’t a comment about your club, I would have mentioned the Bomber BanGate of a few seasons ago as the clear example no matter who made the comment about multiple players being banned at once.

I clearly called submitting a team sheet with errors an administrative error and as far as what happened a few seasons ago, I really don't care, I wasn't here. If you choose to live in the past, that's good for you, I'm not interested at all.

As far as not making comment about my team goes:

Losing players due to bans isn’t an administrative failure. If you’ve been in the league for longer than a few moments you’d understand this (considering your teams history with bans).

Both the clubs in question had issues with acquiring 22 players by the submission deadline. Even if they DID know about the alias saga, why would they out themselves at the risk of having their club be punished.

Anyway, you have a great Saturday, enough of this.

 

[Kennedy Parker]

Would both clubs have had a valid squad submission if Nixi & Nooks were caught on the eve of the season?

Furies started the season on 22 which is the minimum, but they made 2 voluntary delistings.

Old Boys started the season on 23 and made 3 voluntary delistings.

So fair to say had this happened on the eve of the season then both clubs would've just kept an additional inactive on the list.

 

[Senor M]

I clearly called submitting a team sheet with errors an administrative error and as far as what happened a few seasons ago, I really don't care, I wasn't here. If you choose to live in the past, that's good for you, I'm not interested at all.

If you choose to ignore precedent simply because you weren’t here, then you clearly can’t provide an educated opinion on the situation.

The league existed before S34 & those events impact the rules of the league.

My reference was towards the mass BomberBan of a few seasons ago—- if you choose not to know your own clubs history, that’s on you— not me.

 

[damicky]

It was pretty, pretty, pretty good. Put HecticCheese promotions or whatever to shame.

Why don't you drop by the TiFmedia offices on Monday and we'll do brunch.

Nowhere in my legally-binding Contract did it say that I have to agree with you all the time

 

[omgfridge]

It was pretty, pretty, pretty good. Put HecticCheese promotions or whatever to shame.

Why don't you drop by the TiFmedia offices on Monday and we'll do brunch.

Consider it a date!

 

[gab213]

If you choose to ignore precedent simply because you weren’t here, then you clearly can’t provide an education opinion on the situation.

The league existed before S34 & those events impact the rules of the league.

My reference was towards the mass BomberBan of a few seasons ago—- if you choose not to know your own clubs history, that’s on you— not me.

I'm aware of history, but it has its place and that isn't in any discussion of what is happening now. It is irrelevant when discussing this specific situation. If you want to talk about precedent you need to be comparing two things that are the same or at least very similar. Baghdad history has zero to do with what Nooks did, who I play for has nothing to do with what I'm talking about, so yes, it's an irrelevant reference in the context of this discussion.

 

[Senor M]

Furies started the season on 22 which is the minimum, but they made 2 voluntary delistings.

Old Boys started the season on 23 and made 3 voluntary delistings.

So fair to say had this happened on the eve of the season then both clubs would've just kept an additional inactive on the list.

Who out of Bastyy & tugga would have willingly sat on the Furies list for another season. Both seemed liked retirements rather than delistings.

I completely get where you are coming from, but both clubs were playing with fire being that close to the minimum squad numbers

 

[Senor M]

I'm aware of history, but it has its place and that isn't in any discussion of what is happening now. It is irrelevant when discussing this specific situation. If you want to talk about precedent you need to be comparing two things that are the same or at least very similar. Baghdad history has zero to do with what Nooks did, who I play for has nothing to do with what I'm talking about, so yes, it's an irrelevant reference in the context of this discussion.

The Bomber ban is an example of a situation where clubs had insufficient players to field a side.

My suggestion is if Nixi/Nooks got picked up earlier that the clubs in question wouldn’t have had sufficient players to form a squad.

Is it that difficult to understand mate?

Stop getting defensive about a comment about your club, it’s a valid example even if you don’t like it.

 

[Robertio]

I think there should be an investigation into “Bringing the game into disrepute” charges in this situation.

Especially if it’s found out that Nixi was only created/signed after the OOB’s initially approached Nooks.

How do we know it wasn’t a deliberate plan for Nooks to support the Furies while still moving to his new club

Tigerturbulance and Elton Johns Wig had no idea about the alias, what a load of utter crap.

 

[gab213]

The Bomber ban is an example of a situation where clubs had insufficient players to field a side.

My suggestion is if Nixi/Nooks got picked up earlier that the clubs in question wouldn’t have had sufficient players to form a squad.

Is it that difficult to understand mate?

Stop getting defensive about a comment about your club, it’s a valid example even if you don’t like it.

Pretty sure that they would have been able to find somebody even from another team who would have helped them out in the short term, at least you would hope they could. I agree though that having numbers that are close to the minimum is a risky thing.

 

[ClarkeM]

 

[Robertio]

If you choose to ignore precedent simply because you weren’t here, then you clearly can’t provide an educated opinion on the situation.

The league existed before S34 & those events impact the rules of the league.

My reference was towards the mass BomberBan of a few seasons ago—- if you choose not to know your own clubs history, that’s on you— not me.

You say some dumb shit man.