RandB
Brownlow Medallist
- Joined
- Sep 9, 2007
- Posts
- 17,048
- Reaction score
- 13,564
- AFL Club
- Melbourne
- Other Teams
- MUFC Norwood
That's pretty much the impression this article gives.Surely you simply bid for each pick, such as any other trade, the scenario you are suggesting is ridiculous
"It's important to note that the 17 other clubs won't be negotiating for a particular player. They will be negotiating for the first of those four choices, then the second and down the line until the fourth."
The most likely scenario will see GWS auction off two picks to the highest bidders this year and then repeat the process next year in order to maximise their return.
However, if interest in this year's crop of players born in the eligibility window creates a bidding war, then the Giants can conceivably move on all four picks, which the successful clubs can then use on the player of their choice if he's still available.
So even if we are say interested in Crouch and willing to put forward a bid which we think is reasonable for the 2nd pick (as a hypothetical based on our estimate of the market) we would be derelict not to push for the 1st pick with the same offer - there is nothing to lose as far as I can tell in case we have undersold our offer.
I'm not entirely sure how it will play out but it looks like there could be a cascading effect from the 1st pick bidding. Once that is gone, unlucky bids may be rebidded (in same form or modified slightly) for the 2nd pick and so on so even if we have what we think is a reasonable bid for the 2nd pick we may have stiff opposition.









