Muddiemoose
Moderator
- Aug 24, 2017
- 31,748
- 114,585
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Moderator
- #3,901
That is a political argument and might have merit however it hasn’t got anything to do with stack breaking the rules in the first placeIt still doesn't make their rules correct. They are political rules and not safety rules. They give a false impression that the WA public ham up that they somewhat protect their state. They are fortunate that they live in the most isolated state in the country and hence have had the least chance to get COVID. I don't live there and thus, unfortunately, cannot vote the idiot out.
My argument here is that the rules are wrong. They are too harsh. They do not protect the state more than a hefty fine would. I have never argued that Stack hadn't broken the rules. I don't think Stack signed up to anything just as no one has signed up to any COVID rules anywhere. They have been forcefully imposed on us. Some are very good and serve to protect the community whilst others are there just to gain political popularity and serve no purpose in community safety. I'm calling them for what they are.
If you want to be a lap dog and have no spine to argue against unfair rules, well that's your prerogative.
On the other hand, many of us view some of these rules as a breach of human rights. Thrown in jail because of a one hour stopover in Adelaide is way over the top and should be called for what it is - a pathetic and cruel decision.
It’s the same as an Australian getting charged with drug possession in Indonesia
The penalties are overblown but at the end of the day they are the rules and if you break them you need to cop the punishment regardless of how fair or unfair they may seem
Stack can’t claim ignorance imo especially after his history with the incident in qld or the warning he received in WA already





