Remove this Banner Ad

Opinion The 'Carlton related stuff that doesn't need it's own thread' thread Part 2

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Agree with that.

We will continue to drop games to sides we "shouldn't". Even our '95 side lost to 3rd bottom and 5th bottom. I'd rather be good than consistent ;)

The Dogs showed in 2016 that once you get there, you only have to be consistently good for the 4 weeks that matter.

Geez your digging up an old discussion there "Mr. 3 arcs". An average of just over 3 goals a season leads me to stick to 2 arcs for now :)

Wait till he starts resting forward more often
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Wait till he starts resting forward more often
We won't rehash old ground, but it will be interesting to see.

Traditionally if he played mid, he would rest forward - I'll give you that (it's just that he hasn't done it much). This new "man-on-the-mark-must-be-a-statue" rule could change a few things (added to the reduced rotations). The guys who can run past to receive, preferably with pace, who are also really good users, are going to be invaluable in my opinion. He can do all that. Do we want the ball in Williams' hands delivering inside 50, or do we want Gibbons/Setters etc. delivering it to Williams?

I know it theoretically isn't "resting" to run your ring off from half back to receive, but if he plays forward he has to run his ring off to defend the bloke he is playing on, to prevent him doing the exact same thing for the opposition. It's unfortunate for guys like Dow and Stocker how little actual "resting" a player can do whilst remaining on-field.

I can see occasions where we pick a Cottrell over a more talented player, to simply run with a Whitfield, Gaff type because of how much extra easy ball they can rack up.
 
I think we should try to win every game. I am available as a football consultant if anyone is interested.
This maybe the insight we have been missing for the last 25 years. :thumbsu::D
 
I think we should try to win every game. I am available as a football consultant if anyone is interested.
any research behind this - ie has it been shown to be beneficial in the past?
 
We won't rehash old ground, but it will be interesting to see.

Traditionally if he played mid, he would rest forward - I'll give you that (it's just that he hasn't done it much). This new "man-on-the-mark-must-be-a-statue" rule could change a few things (added to the reduced rotations). The guys who can run past to receive, preferably with pace, who are also really good users, are going to be invaluable in my opinion. He can do all that. Do we want the ball in Williams' hands delivering inside 50, or do we want Gibbons/Setters etc. delivering it to Williams?

I know it theoretically isn't "resting" to run your ring off from half back to receive, but if he plays forward he has to run his ring off to defend the bloke he is playing on, to prevent him doing the exact same thing for the opposition. It's unfortunate for guys like Dow and Stocker how little actual "resting" a player can do whilst remaining on-field.

I can see occasions where we pick a Cottrell over a more talented player, to simply run with a Whitfield, Gaff type because of how much extra easy ball they can rack up.

I think the game has continued to evolve where versatility is crucial.

If the likes of Williams is changing with Martin in that mid/forward rotation, we would get the best of both worlds

Make no mistake, Williams will be dangerous and effective when resting forward
 
Look I know it’s cutting edge and controversial, but someone has to be the trailblazer. I truly believe we should give it a shot.
edgy, risky.................make our club proud please.........
 
I think the game has continued to evolve where versatility is crucial.

If the likes of Williams is changing with Martin in that mid/forward rotation, we would get the best of both worlds

Make no mistake, Williams will be dangerous and effective when resting forward
Quite possibly, but he could just as easily switch with SPS at half back.

Martin then switches with Setterfield for example.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Tigers list, getting old.
View attachment 1055466
I think that table is slightly miss-leading. These guys were all in Richmond's 2020 GF team:
Balta (20yo), Baker (22yo), Bolton (21yo), Rioli (23yo), Graham (22yo).

Other youngsters who played during their finals campaign:
Chol (23yo), Ross (20yo).


I agree that the Tigers' list is getting old, but they have plenty of high quality, young talent coming through as well. They will continue to dominate across the league for many years to come.
 
I think that table is slightly miss-leading. These guys were all in Richmond's 2020 GF team:
Balta (20yo), Baker (22yo), Bolton (21yo), Rioli (23yo), Graham (22yo).

Other youngsters who played during their finals campaign:
Chol (23yo), Ross (20yo).


I agree that the Tigers' list is getting old, but they have plenty of high quality, young talent coming through as well. They will continue to dominate across the league for many years to come.

Meh, maybe Balta aside (who looks a ripper) none of the rest listed are ever going to be in the class of a Cotchin, Dusty, Edwards or even a Prestia.

Couple of small forwards, an unremarkable small defender (Baker), Graham is average.

The point was their match winning talent is getting to the pointy end en masse.
 
Dogs made finals, by beating only 1 top 8 side in the Eagles, lose that and beat us, they make it anyway

1 game doesn't dictate a season

Beat the sides around and below you, you make finals, anything more is a bonus, fact
I no longer have the mindset that some games we should win, or some games are harder than others. We have proven that we can match it with the best, there is no reason why we legitimately can't beat every single team this year. Yes, I know it won't happen. But every single game is equally as important as the other (except when we play the Filth or Scum).
 
I no longer have the mindset that some games we should win, or some games are harder than others. We have proven that we can match it with the best, there is no reason why we legitimately can't beat every single team this year. Yes, I know it won't happen. But every single game is equally as important as the other (except when we play the Filth or Scum).

Not a doubt in my mind. The mindset should be that we can win every game.

The reality is that we win games as underdogs, lose games that we should win

Ultimately, I still believe we will make finals this year and that was from 3 seasons ago
 
Not a doubt in my mind. The mindset should be that we can win every game.

The reality is that we win games as underdogs, lose games that we should win

Ultimately, I still believe we will make finals this year and that was from 3 seasons ago
Same with me.

In 2018 when we were right down in the dumps, I predicted that in 2021 we would make finals for the first time in 8 years. I still predict that next year we can push for the top 4, and in 2023 to be a proper premiership contender.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

I no longer have the mindset that some games we should win, or some games are harder than others. We have proven that we can match it with the best, there is no reason why we legitimately can't beat every single team this year. Yes, I know it won't happen. But every single game is equally as important as the other (except when we play the Filth or Scum).

I don’t do pencil ins but great post .


On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
 
Agree with that.

We will continue to drop games to sides we "shouldn't". Even our '95 side lost to 3rd bottom and 5th bottom. I'd rather be good than consistent ;)

The Dogs showed in 2016 that once you get there, you only have to be consistently good for the 4 weeks that matter.

Geez your digging up an old discussion there "Mr. 3 arcs". An average of just over 3 goals a season leads me to stick to 2 arcs for now :)
Might have had something to do with some TAB action.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top