Analysis The Case for Plan B and how it can be done

Remove this Banner Ad

Luuuc

Premiership Player
Jun 26, 2011
3,314
7,272
AFL Club
West Coast
Other Teams
Perth Wildcats, Perth Lynx
Twenty-seven months on and apart from a global pandemic, little has changed which has led to a continuance of disappointment and underachievement in the on-field performance of the club.

Frustratingly, much of what is stated within the OP of this thread could have been written today, as the concerns raised remain valid and are preventing this team from achieving its true potential.


So how does one of the best teams on paper in the competition repeatedly end up with such an embarrassing output?

The unfortunate answer is that the club today has by far the worst tactical setup that I have ever seen from any team that is chasing a finals position.

It is at once compromised in both defence and attack and tries to remediate that by running the midfield into the ground, hampering the ability of that group to impact significantly during the latter part of matches.


Time to revisit how this absurdity evolved.


Looking back

Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it – George Santayana


Rather than just walking over old ground, I’ll refer to where it has been described previously:


And that takes us to 2021, approaching the season with a gameplan that had overwhelmingly pruned back its offensive capability to maintain defensive cohesion in the face of opposing counterattacks.

Then, of course, the rules changed. Turning the mark into a witches’ hat turbocharged how teams could move the ball forward quickly, especially out of the defensive half. Any clubs already vulnerable to quick transition were set to become cannon fodder if they failed to adapt.

The rule changes did not flip over the table and fundamentally change the game – they just accelerated a process towards more direct ball movement that was already underway; a process that over time increasingly placed the club at odds with the rest of the competition.

Opponents came to learn that creating an outnumber through the corridor and linking disposal to shorter targets, rather than kicking long, rips apart the defensive zone of West Coast, creating an easy avenue to goal. Warning signs have been there for over the past two years – the difference now is that every opponent each week is actively working to undo the club through this soft underbelly.

With the benefit of hindsight, the reluctance to modify the system in both directions was a time bomb that was always going to explode eventually once individual brilliance was no longer sufficient to deliver on-field results.

So where are we now? The club has completely broken down in defensive structure; whilst at the same time is completely unable to transition from defence into attack. The rumour-mill is in full swing; calls coming for coaches to be sacked and players traded; whispers of disunity among the playing group; Nisbitt making unnecessary public statements – needless to say, the papers are doing well at the moment due to the club’s predicament.

And yet the club remains in a top eight position with three matches remaining before finals.

Strange times indeed.



Looking in the wrong places

Energy can neither be created nor destroyed; only converted from one form to another – First Law of Thermodynamics, the Law of Conservation of Energy

Energy. We keep hearing about how the club apparently needs more of it – however it remains questionable whether that will do much to address the tactical problems currently faced by the club.

Let’s face it, allowing an opponent 156 uncontested marks goes beyond whatever level of energy that the team may have – it only happens when your tactical setup is utterly incapable of containing the opposition.

It has little to do with energy when the opposition is able to walk through defensive holes in the middle of the ground, because the zone prioritises marking space over players, to the point where once opposing ball gets to the centre square the defence is opened up so comprehensively that it all but guarantees a shot on goal from directly in front.

The Telstra Tracker figures for the aerobic performance of both teams in the Round 20 match against Collingwood are similar, which dispels the obvious myth that the loss was due to being comprehensively outrun or due to a lack of effort by the players. One team ran effectively, engaging dangerous positions; the other ran wildly to guard redundant space.


Considering the club continues to obsessively select squads that are overly tall, such instruction to run when the team currently features a midfield full of players that clearly remain underdone in their conditioning, combined with less rotational support, is a recipe for a dropoff in midfield output (both offensively and defensively) to occur during matches.

Should it really any surprise then when the club concedes so many easy points late in matches?


As you can see opponents are able to burst out of the blocks against West Coast in 2021 as the system allows them to dominate possession. In response, the Eagles invariably push additional numbers up the ground to fill in holes, chase space and rally briefly; but all the extra effort in chasing shadows wears the team down, leaving the opponent free to re-gain dominance of possession during later stages – this time however, with much lower pressure being applied against them, the opponent is able to convert that dominance into easy goals on the scoreboard.

Only the bottom-placed Kangaroos have conceded more points during last quarters this season than West Coast.


The second-oldest playing list in the competition, with a ruckman that averages less than 70% time on ground, combined with a playing squad that incorporates 6-7 other key talls, in addition to restoration of 20 minute quarters, reduced rotations, shortened preseason and midfielders returning from long-term injuries…

And yet the approach is to somehow out-work the opponent and close out space, primarily through aerobic effort, in order to pin them down and gain territorial superiority.

Running is simply not a strength of this West Coast team, especially so when selection keeps finding places for unnecessary numbers of key-sized players – so expecting it to cover more ground than the opponent as a means of maintaining defensive cohesion is utterly foolish – and unfortunately will more often than not, lead to disappointing outcomes of the type that we been seeing of late.

Having more “energy” won’t make Naitanui into an 85% time on ground ruckman, much like getting Langdon to run 14km+ up the ground chasing grass won’t help the team to win ground balls in attack.

It is one thing to work hard, gut run and show effort – but if that extra effort leads to little in outcome other than early fatigue which allows the opponent to take hold of the game – then it just becomes dumb football.



Undone

However beautiful the strategy, you should occasionally look at the results — Winston Churchill

Collingwood are a poor team. Even after the Round 20 performance they remain last in the competition for averages in metres gained, inside 50s and clearances; second-last for contested possessions and third-last for points scored.

Yet by half time they were ahead of West Coast 61-11.

The Magpies ended up scoring 14 goals:
  • 13 came via ball use through the corridor
  • 10 came from West Coast turnovers
  • 9 came from chains that began in the defensive half of the ground
All the flaws in the current system were laid bare - the Eagles gave the ball away going forward and then simply could not prevent the Magpies from generating attack out of defence.

Robert Harvey, looking for just his second victory whilst in charge, simply instructed his team to perform the following:
  • Run the lanes
  • Look for the short option
  • Generate extra numbers in the corridor
  • Move the ball quickly at every opportunity
Really simple stuff. But that is all that is necessary to break the Eagles’ defence. There is nothing novel about what Collingwood did; indeed, several teams had already done as such earlier in the season.

West Coast still have not adapted to the changes made to the on the mark rule. Defensively, the Eagles still actively allow for the opposition to mark on the defensive side of the corridor – previously the mark would be held up and the subsequent kick would be directed either wide to the wing or long towards the intercept marking prowess waiting in the West Coast backline. This year however, that mark is able to offload to an overlap runner or pivot and spot-up a short target, circumventing the zone in the middle of the ground entirely and providing opportunity for very dangerous entries into attack.

This is clearly evident when one looks at the average metres gained per disposal of opponents:


Opponents create more short disposal possession chains against West Coast than any other team in the competition.

With the offensive capability teams now have at their disposal due to the recent rule changes, the days of being able to zone space through the middle are gone – if an opposing player is there somebody must go to them and mark up.

The dominance of “space” zones that are analogous to those utilised in soccer and hockey and are based more towards containing or directing opposing ball use in a certain way, is over. In their place are basketball-style “track” or hybrid zones, where players will track man-on-man with an opposing counterpart when play is in certain areas of the ground.

The first hurdle the club must overcome on the road to redemption is the abandonment of the zone defence as it currently stands.

The second hurdle relates to the ease in which opponents are able to accumulate possession. West Coast are not just bad – they are in a category all to themselves kind of bad when it comes to opposition dominance of ball.


The club are on average conceding more than 70 additional effective disposals per game in comparison to Geelong – that is the equivalent of providing the opponent with an extra three good players on the ground.

The Round 20 match was the third time in 2021 that the club found itself losing uncontested possessions by more than 100. In more than half of matches this season, the Eagles have lost uncontested possessions by 30 or more.

So, what’s up with that? A club with a (on paper at least) strong midfield contingent that includes arguably the best outside runner of the past decade in Gaff but is being repeatedly obliterated for outside ball by opponents. The answer, once again, lies in tactical absurdity.

As has been described previously on several occasions now, opponents look to nullify the stoppage impact of Naitanui by creating extras through the middle, usually from half forward as the West Coast defence prefers to hold their position rather than track opponents up the ground.

With the advantage of unchecked extras around stoppage, opponents are able to actively block out the primary midfielders of the Eagles, whilst leaving open channels for their team-mates to exploit in the advent of them winning the clearance. The effect can be observed in the contrast for the club between clearances from centre bounces (where opponents cannot create extras due to 6-6-6 positioning) and those from stoppages where those opposing extras are able to be involved:


Only Richmond (who actively remove players from stoppage to setup their turnover-based gameplan) and the bottom-placed Kangaroos have a greater disparity between output at centre bounce and stoppage.

With the team struggling to break even in the middle, the go-to response by the Eagles post-2018 is to cannibalise the forward line and repurpose it as additional cover for the under-pressure defence. The result is West Coast forwards often end up spending significant periods away from where they would usually be expected to operate and forward half pressure unsurprisingly drops off a cliff. A prime example is the current use of Langdon, who has become the latest re-tread version of the redundant aerobic sweeping “Masten” role – occupying so much time in the defensive half of the ground that he is no longer really playing as a forward at all.

Of course, limiting the attack in such a way creates its own set of problems that are arguably far worse than the problem it is setting out to address. It is here that opponents are able to reaffirm their transition game, counterattacking from defence and where the club’s own ball movement from the back half suffers a lonely, withering death.

Rather, one should work to prevent the opposition from creating those midfield extras in the first place.

The third piece that requires correction is offensive ball movement (or the lack thereof).

What is the point of trying to control possession if no ground is being gained? As we as fans are all too aware, much to our frustration, the West Coast will voluntarily lose territory not just once, but multiple times in a match, trying to manufacture a slow switch in play that will never open up the opposing defence and only results in additional pressure being placed upon the Eagles’ defence that was completely unnecessary.

But for what reason is the retreat in the first place? No other club in the entire competition exhibits such risky activity that is so lacking in reward. Perhaps that is because there is a lack of options to kick to as the West Coast forwards are spending so much time up the ground to cover space defensively that they are often unavailable as offensive targets up forward. Thus the current situation is brought about, typified by slow, predictable ball movement that does not pose a threat to the opposing defence, ranking dead last of all teams for generating scores from the defensive half.

Get players ahead of the ball, stretch the opposing defence and provide those defenders with something to be worried about that creates uncertainty in terms of their positioning – that is how you create the opportunity for swift and direct ball movement that can tear a team to pieces.



A familiar solution

We are defined by what we do repeatedly; therefore excellence is a habit, not an act – Aristotle

West Coast has thus far in 2021, performed well below their potential capability. The current position of the club on the ladder however, is reflective of its level of performance this year:


So how can this gap in unfulfilled potential be bridged? And perhaps, just as importantly, how can necessary change be successfully implemented at such short notice, with just three matches remaining before finals?

Recall those three areas that need to be addressed:
  • Abandon the current zone defence
  • Prevent the opponent from positioning extras through the middle of the ground
  • Get more players ahead of the ball

Each of those can be addressed through the implementation of a fairly simple hybrid press.

Sound familiar? It was postulated in the OP of this thread:


Time to expand upon that further and offer a solution to the club’s current woes:


A press anchored at half forward supersedes the redundant zone sitting in the defensive half.

Attack:

A forward line that is mobile, maintains players ahead of ball, stretches the opposing defence and takes away the easy option for opponents to rebound out through the corridor. Despite being a press, only five specialist forward positions are used and just two of those are key-sized – there is no “land of the giants” trash going on here. Similarly, any notion of a “Neo-Masten” aerobic sweeping defensive forward is dead, buried and cremated. This is emphasis on mobility, pressure and creativity – keeping these positions forward of centre at all times and ruthlessly turning opposition turnovers into scoring opportunity.

The full forward remains deep near the goalsquare, granting them plenty of space to lead into and making any opposing defensive sweepers accountable. Specialist small forwards are positioned around CHF for both the immediate ground ball from marking contests and as overlapping secondary disposal options running in towards goal. One of those positions starts as a floater on the attacking side of forward half stoppages before going forward to hit the spillage drop zone of marking contests at pace – in a similar way to how S.Bolton is used at his most damaging at Richmond.

Defence:

A back seven featuring a pair of inverse wingers that operates more as a back five for much of the time. The inverse wings start from defensive positions and run lanes through the corridor, offering additional offensive support to the midfield and greater capability in marking opposing players in the middle of the ground. These are positions that are capable of taking possession, taking the game on and switching lanes quickly through good decisions and disposal. An ideal example of such positions used effectively is Sydney with J.Dawson and J.Lloyd.

Of the three key talls in defence, one is given greater latitude to peel away from their mark and work aggressively as the primary interceptor of incoming disposal from the opposition. Another advantage of having this number of key players down back is that one can be called upon to fulfil secondary ruck duties, leaving the structure of the forward press unaffected.

The emphasis here is to have a defence that is robust against incoming attacks, but also capable of transitioning possession quickly and feeding it through the corridor.

Midfield:

The wings start high and stay high, providing width to what is otherwise a narrow forward line. They track back defensively, but their primary instructions are to provide an outlet ahead of the ball and cut-off any diagonal kick from the opposition defence that is targeting the corridor.

The rest of the midfield group keep narrow in their positioning, ensuring representation of numbers in dangerous areas in the middle of the ground. This is also where the hybrid-nature of this press comes into play – anywhere on the ground within a rectangle bounded by the painted numbers on the 50 metre arcs, opposition players are tightly marked with as little space given as possible (i.e. in the corridor, between the arcs, defence is man-on-man).

When in possession, they look for the lane runners in the middle to get the ball forward rather than bombing it without purpose.


This is a fairly simple plan – I do not see it unreasonable to believe that a squad currently practising a far more complex set of instructions could gain knowledge of its execution pretty quickly.

Put all these pieces together and I have no doubt that you would see a remarkably different looking team in both approach and performance, despite little change in playing personnel.



This season remains incredibly open – all that is necessary is for a team to find a good vein of form at the right time and they can be the last team standing. Nobody gave the Bulldogs a chance in 2016 after losing to 16th placed Fremantle by four goals leading into finals – yet four weeks later they were being crowned premiers.


John Lennon may have said that “All you need is love”, but in football all you need is four good weeks.

With the right setup and outlook, there remains no reason those weeks cannot belong to the West Coast Eagles.

I've never seen so many tables, graphics & categorical breakdowns used just to conclude that all we need to change is for the coach to get angry at the players now & then, but I appreciate your willingness to take on the task and your thoroughness. Excellent analysis.
 
Apr 29, 2005
14,161
24,590
Perth
AFL Club
West Coast
Fantastic analysis. The "it's not the gameplan thats the problem" crew on here are going to be hard pressed finding arguments against any of it, could be interesting

Unfortunately given that we've dropped Langdon and bought in Vardy this week, hard to see that anything will change for tonight's game.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Rowan18

Norm Smith Medallist
Feb 20, 2018
7,245
14,577
AFL Club
West Coast
Fantastic analysis. The "it's not the gameplan thats the problem" crew on here are going to be hard pressed finding arguments against any of it, could be interesting

Unfortunately given that we've dropped Langdon and bought in Vardy this week, hard to see that anything will change for tonight's game.
Yeah, it highlights that the problems are definitely on the coaches. We'd better see a big clean out of assistants at year's end and Simmo to be put on notice.
 

darksquare

Club Legend
Oct 11, 2016
1,130
2,491
Edgewater
AFL Club
West Coast
Other Teams
Swan Districts


Defence:

A back seven featuring a pair of inverse wingers that operates more as a back five for much of the time. The inverse wings start from defensive positions and run lanes through the corridor, offering additional offensive support to the midfield and greater capability in marking opposing players in the middle of the ground. These are positions that are capable of taking possession, taking the game on and switching lanes quickly through good decisions and disposal. An ideal example of such positions used effectively is Sydney with J.Dawson and J.Lloyd.

One thing I like about this is the ruthless way you've dropped players who are talented, promising or hardworking, if they don't mesh with the system: Allen, Rotham, Waterman, Petruccelle, Langdon, Nelson, Cole. In doing so, I think you've come up with a system that will counteract opposition sides running the ball through our zone with impunity.

However, I think the line-up you've proposed is still vulnerable to an opposition attack using chaos ball, relying on their forward pressure. I'm worried about our capacity there to defend ground balls in our defensive 50. A team like Brisbane - with Cameron, McCarthy, Bailey and now Cockatoo - would be very hard to match up on.

I wonder if we couldn't go one step further, and replace H Edwards or Barrass with a smaller defender - asking Hurn or Sheppard (or both, if McGovern is in the ruck) to play tall. As I recall, many of our best undermanned wins have been when an undersized backline still manages to subdue the opposition's marking forwards.

So we'd go in with 5 talls only - the absolute opposite of our traditional strategy. But the ones that are still in the side are very good indeed, and all of Ryan, Hurn and Sheppard play taller than their listed height.
 

EagleEgo

Club Legend
Jun 3, 2008
2,241
1,661
Perth
AFL Club
West Coast
Whether it is plan B, C or D, Man on Man must be practised and utilised. I can think of at least two reasons for that:
1. If it is utilised correctly, this style has the ability to slow down the opposition and is very good to protect our winning scores. Losing a game with more than 30 points in front at mid-3rd qtr cannot be tolerated.
2. If the opposition is playing Man-on-Man against you, you are forced to play the same style and have to know how to win with this style.
 
Last edited:

bh90210fan

Norm Smith Medallist
Sep 4, 2017
9,623
11,107
AFL Club
West Coast
Start owning the corridor. Make it a priority to defend it at all costs. We need to force teams wide to give our defenders half a chance. Sick of watching teams stream through the middle and opening up our whole defensive 50. Move the zone higher up the ground as suggested and let’s start trying to turn the ball over in our forward half.
 
Oct 17, 2018
1,650
3,016
AFL Club
West Coast
Dylan82 I feel our current gameplan can work at given times if the side is fit enough to out run opponents and provide an option for the kicker, but this game plan needs to be our Plan B for certain situations when we need to control the tempo or regain composure.
Your analysis is amazing and should be our go to game style in my opinion.
 

The wily weagle

Premiership Player
Oct 16, 2014
3,288
7,541
AFL Club
West Coast
Also think we need a serious shake up to players diets and S&C program.

Sacrilege!! Our medical and strength and conditioning teams are the best in the land!

Who cares if you are injured half the time and couldn't bench press 10kgs, all that matter is Sheed ran and personal best 2km time trial and the medical staff are "pretty sure" they have got Shuey right. This time. 😉
 
Last edited:

The Passenger

The passenger, I am...
Veteran 10k Posts 30k Posts Sensible Type WCE Wings Guernsey
Mar 25, 2003
35,681
28,332
"it's not the gameplan thats the problem"
Is there anyone defending the game plan?

A number of us were saying it was susceptible to high pressure opposition from as early 2019 (and some from the moment Richmond unveiled their hyper footy game plan in 2017) and from what can I see anyone that wasn't on board with this train of thought is well and truly on board now.

There is absolutely no question we need to add a more contested edge to our football and increase the speed at which we move the ball. Both of those will come at a cost to our skill level, so the question is what's the right balance. Being able to put together a long string of passes and hit a forward lace out looks fantastic, but the reality is the pressure 2021 footballers are able to bring just breaks that down too easily and too often, especially if the conditions aren't pristine.

Our system relies on being able to hit key forward targets but with Allen beaten to a pulp and JD's form dropping off a cliff it's no wonder things have gone pear shaped. JK has put in a huge shift in 2021 but he's 34 - he ain't JK of the GF years and he never will be again. He is gonna be one sore bloke when the sirens sounds on this season. Like a marathon runner pushing over the line with their last ounce of energy.

With the make up of this playing group and Simmo's coaching philosophy we are probably never going to be a beastly contested team, but you can't sit in the bottom handful of teams for contested football and expect to do something meaningful in September. To win a flag you don't have to be the most physical team in the competition, but you gotta bring something to the table in that department.

No one will look back at the 2018 team as a fearsome squad that would leave opponents battered and bruised every week, but they held their own from a physical aspect and didn't get close to out muscled the way we are at the moment. IIRC in 2018 we ramped up the physicality in the last quarter of the season and into September, and played a fairly different style to the earlier parts of the season. Even if that was the plan for 2021, I just don't see it in this particular playing group (mentally not enough of them look up for that sort of fight) and even if they were able to start bringing it from next weekend, too much damage has been sustained to the 2021 season anyway.
 

Ishmael_

Premiership Player
Apr 30, 2013
3,996
11,281
Six Thousand
AFL Club
West Coast
Other Teams
South Fremantle
Is there anyone defending the game plan?

A number of us were saying it was susceptible to high pressure opposition from as early 2019 (and some from the moment Richmond unveiled their hyper footy game plan in 2017) and from what can I see anyone that wasn't on board with this train of thought is well and truly on board now.

There is absolutely no question we need to add a more contested edge to our football and increase the speed at which we move the ball. Both of those will come at a cost to our skill level, so the question is what's the right balance. Being able to put together a long string of passes and hit a forward lace out looks fantastic, but the reality is the pressure 2021 footballers are able to bring just breaks that down too easily and too often, especially if the conditions aren't pristine.

Our system relies on being able to hit key forward targets but with Allen beaten to a pulp and JD's form dropping off a cliff it's no wonder things have gone pear shaped. JK has put in a huge shift in 2021 but he's 34 - he ain't JK of the GF years and he never will be again. He is gonna be one sore bloke when the sirens sounds on this season. Like a marathon runner pushing over the line with their last ounce of energy.

With the make up of this playing group and Simmo's coaching philosophy we are probably never going to be a beastly contested team, but you can't sit in the bottom handful of teams for contested football and expect to do something meaningful in September. To win a flag you don't have to be the most physical team in the competition, but you gotta bring something to the table in that department.

No one will look back at the 2018 team as a fearsome squad that would leave opponents battered and bruised every week, but they held their own from a physical aspect and didn't get close to out muscled the way we are at the moment. IIRC in 2018 we ramped up the physicality in the last quarter of the season and into September, and played a fairly different style to the earlier parts of the season. Even if that was the plan for 2021, I just don't see it in this particular playing group (mentally not enough of them look up for that sort of fight) and even if they were able to start bringing it from next weekend, too much damage has been sustained to the 2021 season anyway.

I agree with this and actually don't think you need to be a great contested ball team at all. But you need to be able to pressure the opposition ball carrier and when you counter attack it needs to be quick, otherwise you do need to win contested ball and win it all the time.

Richmond, Hawthorn and WC have all been pretty ordinary contested ball winning teams. Sydney and Bulldogs in 2016 were good, but Bulldogs finished 7th after H/A and other teams like Port and Geelong have been excellent at winning the hard ball but have consistently fallen short. Similarly Melbourne in 2018 - nowhere near it in the end.

Weirdly for a team that plays a largely uncontested style and as you've mentioned above, we only ever really looked good when we won the contested possession as it allows the rest of the game plan to take shape. That means a hell of a lot of contested marks and when we were really on, around the ground as well. But as we've shown this year, even when we do win the contested ball, we're anemic when going forward and slow to take advantage of those wins. That's what has changed.

I think Simpson has been slow to react to the changes the league has implemented and stubborn to a fault. The players have been ordinary this year, but the off-field team has been awful - coaching, preparation, everything. And I do think he needs greater support in the coaches box, strong personalities that can make him rethink his priors.

Where I differ from some of the more virulent posters, is that I still think Simpson is a very smart, tactically astute coach - who is capable of fixing this mess. But it could go either way, Ross Lyon is inarguably a smart football coach with a great football brain, but he refused to listen to outside influences and ended up pushing a failing game plan against all logic.

Adapt or die Simpson, time to show us what you got.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Trouto

Premiership Player
Jul 3, 2007
3,378
3,451
Bunbury
AFL Club
West Coast
Twenty-seven months on and apart from a global pandemic, little has changed which has led to a continuance of disappointment and underachievement in the on-field performance of the club.

Frustratingly, much of what is stated within the OP of this thread could have been written today, as the concerns raised remain valid and are preventing this team from achieving its true potential.


So how does one of the best teams on paper in the competition repeatedly end up with such an embarrassing output?

The unfortunate answer is that the club today has by far the worst tactical setup that I have ever seen from any team that is chasing a finals position.

It is at once compromised in both defence and attack and tries to remediate that by running the midfield into the ground, hampering the ability of that group to impact significantly during the latter part of matches.


Time to revisit how this absurdity evolved.


Looking back

Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it – George Santayana


Rather than just walking over old ground, I’ll refer to where it has been described previously:


And that takes us to 2021, approaching the season with a gameplan that had overwhelmingly pruned back its offensive capability to maintain defensive cohesion in the face of opposing counterattacks.

Then, of course, the rules changed. Turning the mark into a witches’ hat turbocharged how teams could move the ball forward quickly, especially out of the defensive half. Any clubs already vulnerable to quick transition were set to become cannon fodder if they failed to adapt.

The rule changes did not flip over the table and fundamentally change the game – they just accelerated a process towards more direct ball movement that was already underway; a process that over time increasingly placed the club at odds with the rest of the competition.

Opponents came to learn that creating an outnumber through the corridor and linking disposal to shorter targets, rather than kicking long, rips apart the defensive zone of West Coast, creating an easy avenue to goal. Warning signs have been there for over the past two years – the difference now is that every opponent each week is actively working to undo the club through this soft underbelly.

With the benefit of hindsight, the reluctance to modify the system in both directions was a time bomb that was always going to explode eventually once individual brilliance was no longer sufficient to deliver on-field results.

So where are we now? The club has completely broken down in defensive structure; whilst at the same time is completely unable to transition from defence into attack. The rumour-mill is in full swing; calls coming for coaches to be sacked and players traded; whispers of disunity among the playing group; Nisbitt making unnecessary public statements – needless to say, the papers are doing well at the moment due to the club’s predicament.

And yet the club remains in a top eight position with three matches remaining before finals.

Strange times indeed.



Looking in the wrong places

Energy can neither be created nor destroyed; only converted from one form to another – First Law of Thermodynamics, the Law of Conservation of Energy

Energy. We keep hearing about how the club apparently needs more of it – however it remains questionable whether that will do much to address the tactical problems currently faced by the club.

Let’s face it, allowing an opponent 156 uncontested marks goes beyond whatever level of energy that the team may have – it only happens when your tactical setup is utterly incapable of containing the opposition.

It has little to do with energy when the opposition is able to walk through defensive holes in the middle of the ground, because the zone prioritises marking space over players, to the point where once opposing ball gets to the centre square the defence is opened up so comprehensively that it all but guarantees a shot on goal from directly in front.

The Telstra Tracker figures for the aerobic performance of both teams in the Round 20 match against Collingwood are similar, which dispels the obvious myth that the loss was due to being comprehensively outrun or due to a lack of effort by the players. One team ran effectively, engaging dangerous positions; the other ran wildly to guard redundant space.


Considering the club continues to obsessively select squads that are overly tall, such instruction to run when the team currently features a midfield full of players that clearly remain underdone in their conditioning, combined with less rotational support, is a recipe for a dropoff in midfield output (both offensively and defensively) to occur during matches.

Should it really any surprise then when the club concedes so many easy points late in matches?


As you can see opponents are able to burst out of the blocks against West Coast in 2021 as the system allows them to dominate possession. In response, the Eagles invariably push additional numbers up the ground to fill in holes, chase space and rally briefly; but all the extra effort in chasing shadows wears the team down, leaving the opponent free to re-gain dominance of possession during later stages – this time however, with much lower pressure being applied against them, the opponent is able to convert that dominance into easy goals on the scoreboard.

Only the bottom-placed Kangaroos have conceded more points during last quarters this season than West Coast.


The second-oldest playing list in the competition, with a ruckman that averages less than 70% time on ground, combined with a playing squad that incorporates 6-7 other key talls, in addition to restoration of 20 minute quarters, reduced rotations, shortened preseason and midfielders returning from long-term injuries…

And yet the approach is to somehow out-work the opponent and close out space, primarily through aerobic effort, in order to pin them down and gain territorial superiority.

Running is simply not a strength of this West Coast team, especially so when selection keeps finding places for unnecessary numbers of key-sized players – so expecting it to cover more ground than the opponent as a means of maintaining defensive cohesion is utterly foolish – and unfortunately will more often than not, lead to disappointing outcomes of the type that we been seeing of late.

Having more “energy” won’t make Naitanui into an 85% time on ground ruckman, much like getting Langdon to run 14km+ up the ground chasing grass won’t help the team to win ground balls in attack.

It is one thing to work hard, gut run and show effort – but if that extra effort leads to little in outcome other than early fatigue which allows the opponent to take hold of the game – then it just becomes dumb football.



Undone

However beautiful the strategy, you should occasionally look at the results — Winston Churchill

Collingwood are a poor team. Even after the Round 20 performance they remain last in the competition for averages in metres gained, inside 50s and clearances; second-last for contested possessions and third-last for points scored.

Yet by half time they were ahead of West Coast 61-11.

The Magpies ended up scoring 14 goals:
  • 13 came via ball use through the corridor
  • 10 came from West Coast turnovers
  • 9 came from chains that began in the defensive half of the ground
All the flaws in the current system were laid bare - the Eagles gave the ball away going forward and then simply could not prevent the Magpies from generating attack out of defence.

Robert Harvey, looking for just his second victory whilst in charge, simply instructed his team to perform the following:
  • Run the lanes
  • Look for the short option
  • Generate extra numbers in the corridor
  • Move the ball quickly at every opportunity
Really simple stuff. But that is all that is necessary to break the Eagles’ defence. There is nothing novel about what Collingwood did; indeed, several teams had already done as such earlier in the season.

West Coast still have not adapted to the changes made to the on the mark rule. Defensively, the Eagles still actively allow for the opposition to mark on the defensive side of the corridor – previously the mark would be held up and the subsequent kick would be directed either wide to the wing or long towards the intercept marking prowess waiting in the West Coast backline. This year however, that mark is able to offload to an overlap runner or pivot and spot-up a short target, circumventing the zone in the middle of the ground entirely and providing opportunity for very dangerous entries into attack.

This is clearly evident when one looks at the average metres gained per disposal of opponents:


Opponents create more short disposal possession chains against West Coast than any other team in the competition.

With the offensive capability teams now have at their disposal due to the recent rule changes, the days of being able to zone space through the middle are gone – if an opposing player is there somebody must go to them and mark up.

The dominance of “space” zones that are analogous to those utilised in soccer and hockey and are based more towards containing or directing opposing ball use in a certain way, is over. In their place are basketball-style “track” or hybrid zones, where players will track man-on-man with an opposing counterpart when play is in certain areas of the ground.

The first hurdle the club must overcome on the road to redemption is the abandonment of the zone defence as it currently stands.

The second hurdle relates to the ease in which opponents are able to accumulate possession. West Coast are not just bad – they are in a category all to themselves kind of bad when it comes to opposition dominance of ball.


The club are on average conceding more than 70 additional effective disposals per game in comparison to Geelong – that is the equivalent of providing the opponent with an extra three good players on the ground.

The Round 20 match was the third time in 2021 that the club found itself losing uncontested possessions by more than 100. In more than half of matches this season, the Eagles have lost uncontested possessions by 30 or more.

So, what’s up with that? A club with a (on paper at least) strong midfield contingent that includes arguably the best outside runner of the past decade in Gaff but is being repeatedly obliterated for outside ball by opponents. The answer, once again, lies in tactical absurdity.

As has been described previously on several occasions now, opponents look to nullify the stoppage impact of Naitanui by creating extras through the middle, usually from half forward as the West Coast defence prefers to hold their position rather than track opponents up the ground.

With the advantage of unchecked extras around stoppage, opponents are able to actively block out the primary midfielders of the Eagles, whilst leaving open channels for their team-mates to exploit in the advent of them winning the clearance. The effect can be observed in the contrast for the club between clearances from centre bounces (where opponents cannot create extras due to 6-6-6 positioning) and those from stoppages where those opposing extras are able to be involved:


Only Richmond (who actively remove players from stoppage to setup their turnover-based gameplan) and the bottom-placed Kangaroos have a greater disparity between output at centre bounce and stoppage.

With the team struggling to break even in the middle, the go-to response by the Eagles post-2018 is to cannibalise the forward line and repurpose it as additional cover for the under-pressure defence. The result is West Coast forwards often end up spending significant periods away from where they would usually be expected to operate and forward half pressure unsurprisingly drops off a cliff. A prime example is the current use of Langdon, who has become the latest re-tread version of the redundant aerobic sweeping “Masten” role – occupying so much time in the defensive half of the ground that he is no longer really playing as a forward at all.

Of course, limiting the attack in such a way creates its own set of problems that are arguably far worse than the problem it is setting out to address. It is here that opponents are able to reaffirm their transition game, counterattacking from defence and where the club’s own ball movement from the back half suffers a lonely, withering death.

Rather, one should work to prevent the opposition from creating those midfield extras in the first place.

The third piece that requires correction is offensive ball movement (or the lack thereof).

What is the point of trying to control possession if no ground is being gained? As we as fans are all too aware, much to our frustration, the West Coast will voluntarily lose territory not just once, but multiple times in a match, trying to manufacture a slow switch in play that will never open up the opposing defence and only results in additional pressure being placed upon the Eagles’ defence that was completely unnecessary.

But for what reason is the retreat in the first place? No other club in the entire competition exhibits such risky activity that is so lacking in reward. Perhaps that is because there is a lack of options to kick to as the West Coast forwards are spending so much time up the ground to cover space defensively that they are often unavailable as offensive targets up forward. Thus the current situation is brought about, typified by slow, predictable ball movement that does not pose a threat to the opposing defence, ranking dead last of all teams for generating scores from the defensive half.

Get players ahead of the ball, stretch the opposing defence and provide those defenders with something to be worried about that creates uncertainty in terms of their positioning – that is how you create the opportunity for swift and direct ball movement that can tear a team to pieces.



A familiar solution

We are defined by what we do repeatedly; therefore excellence is a habit, not an act – Aristotle

West Coast has thus far in 2021, performed well below their potential capability. The current position of the club on the ladder however, is reflective of its level of performance this year:


So how can this gap in unfulfilled potential be bridged? And perhaps, just as importantly, how can necessary change be successfully implemented at such short notice, with just three matches remaining before finals?

Recall those three areas that need to be addressed:
  • Abandon the current zone defence
  • Prevent the opponent from positioning extras through the middle of the ground
  • Get more players ahead of the ball

Each of those can be addressed through the implementation of a fairly simple hybrid press.

Sound familiar? It was postulated in the OP of this thread:


Time to expand upon that further and offer a solution to the club’s current woes:


A press anchored at half forward supersedes the redundant zone sitting in the defensive half.

Attack:

A forward line that is mobile, maintains players ahead of ball, stretches the opposing defence and takes away the easy option for opponents to rebound out through the corridor. Despite being a press, only five specialist forward positions are used and just two of those are key-sized – there is no “land of the giants” trash going on here. Similarly, any notion of a “Neo-Masten” aerobic sweeping defensive forward is dead, buried and cremated. This is emphasis on mobility, pressure and creativity – keeping these positions forward of centre at all times and ruthlessly turning opposition turnovers into scoring opportunity.

The full forward remains deep near the goalsquare, granting them plenty of space to lead into and making any opposing defensive sweepers accountable. Specialist small forwards are positioned around CHF for both the immediate ground ball from marking contests and as overlapping secondary disposal options running in towards goal. One of those positions starts as a floater on the attacking side of forward half stoppages before going forward to hit the spillage drop zone of marking contests at pace – in a similar way to how S.Bolton is used at his most damaging at Richmond.

Defence:

A back seven featuring a pair of inverse wingers that operates more as a back five for much of the time. The inverse wings start from defensive positions and run lanes through the corridor, offering additional offensive support to the midfield and greater capability in marking opposing players in the middle of the ground. These are positions that are capable of taking possession, taking the game on and switching lanes quickly through good decisions and disposal. An ideal example of such positions used effectively is Sydney with J.Dawson and J.Lloyd.

Of the three key talls in defence, one is given greater latitude to peel away from their mark and work aggressively as the primary interceptor of incoming disposal from the opposition. Another advantage of having this number of key players down back is that one can be called upon to fulfil secondary ruck duties, leaving the structure of the forward press unaffected.

The emphasis here is to have a defence that is robust against incoming attacks, but also capable of transitioning possession quickly and feeding it through the corridor.

Midfield:

The wings start high and stay high, providing width to what is otherwise a narrow forward line. They track back defensively, but their primary instructions are to provide an outlet ahead of the ball and cut-off any diagonal kick from the opposition defence that is targeting the corridor.

The rest of the midfield group keep narrow in their positioning, ensuring representation of numbers in dangerous areas in the middle of the ground. This is also where the hybrid-nature of this press comes into play – anywhere on the ground within a rectangle bounded by the painted numbers on the 50 metre arcs, opposition players are tightly marked with as little space given as possible (i.e. in the corridor, between the arcs, defence is man-on-man).

When in possession, they look for the lane runners in the middle to get the ball forward rather than bombing it without purpose.


This is a fairly simple plan – I do not see it unreasonable to believe that a squad currently practising a far more complex set of instructions could gain knowledge of its execution pretty quickly.

Put all these pieces together and I have no doubt that you would see a remarkably different looking team in both approach and performance, despite little change in playing personnel.



This season remains incredibly open – all that is necessary is for a team to find a good vein of form at the right time and they can be the last team standing. Nobody gave the Bulldogs a chance in 2016 after losing to 16th placed Fremantle by four goals leading into finals – yet four weeks later they were being crowned premiers.


John Lennon may have said that “All you need is love”, but in football all you need is four good weeks.

With the right setup and outlook, there remains no reason those weeks cannot belong to the West Coast Eagles.
Jeesus Dylan, do you have a job?
"footbal obsessed" dont do you justice mate, you are next level. hats off, this is pure gold - if you want an insight into the current woes of the Eagles folks, read this and enlighten yourself!
 

Trouto

Premiership Player
Jul 3, 2007
3,378
3,451
Bunbury
AFL Club
West Coast
I love this. It actually explains what is going wrong. Your solution is also amazingly simple and elegant. It makes me feel a bit depressed that no-one in the club can see this.

If we do one thing in the off season, I hope it is to get at least one assistant from a club that used this blueprint to beat us. Hopefully they sit down on day 1 and explain how dogshit our current gameplan is.
i dont think we need an assistant from another club - get them to hire Dylan!
 

Trouto

Premiership Player
Jul 3, 2007
3,378
3,451
Bunbury
AFL Club
West Coast
Twenty-seven months on and apart from a global pandemic, little has changed which has led to a continuance of disappointment and underachievement in the on-field performance of the club.

Frustratingly, much of what is stated within the OP of this thread could have been written today, as the concerns raised remain valid and are preventing this team from achieving its true potential.


So how does one of the best teams on paper in the competition repeatedly end up with such an embarrassing output?

The unfortunate answer is that the club today has by far the worst tactical setup that I have ever seen from any team that is chasing a finals position.

It is at once compromised in both defence and attack and tries to remediate that by running the midfield into the ground, hampering the ability of that group to impact significantly during the latter part of matches.


Time to revisit how this absurdity evolved.


Looking back

Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it – George Santayana


Rather than just walking over old ground, I’ll refer to where it has been described previously:


And that takes us to 2021, approaching the season with a gameplan that had overwhelmingly pruned back its offensive capability to maintain defensive cohesion in the face of opposing counterattacks.

Then, of course, the rules changed. Turning the mark into a witches’ hat turbocharged how teams could move the ball forward quickly, especially out of the defensive half. Any clubs already vulnerable to quick transition were set to become cannon fodder if they failed to adapt.

The rule changes did not flip over the table and fundamentally change the game – they just accelerated a process towards more direct ball movement that was already underway; a process that over time increasingly placed the club at odds with the rest of the competition.

Opponents came to learn that creating an outnumber through the corridor and linking disposal to shorter targets, rather than kicking long, rips apart the defensive zone of West Coast, creating an easy avenue to goal. Warning signs have been there for over the past two years – the difference now is that every opponent each week is actively working to undo the club through this soft underbelly.

With the benefit of hindsight, the reluctance to modify the system in both directions was a time bomb that was always going to explode eventually once individual brilliance was no longer sufficient to deliver on-field results.

So where are we now? The club has completely broken down in defensive structure; whilst at the same time is completely unable to transition from defence into attack. The rumour-mill is in full swing; calls coming for coaches to be sacked and players traded; whispers of disunity among the playing group; Nisbitt making unnecessary public statements – needless to say, the papers are doing well at the moment due to the club’s predicament.

And yet the club remains in a top eight position with three matches remaining before finals.

Strange times indeed.



Looking in the wrong places

Energy can neither be created nor destroyed; only converted from one form to another – First Law of Thermodynamics, the Law of Conservation of Energy

Energy. We keep hearing about how the club apparently needs more of it – however it remains questionable whether that will do much to address the tactical problems currently faced by the club.

Let’s face it, allowing an opponent 156 uncontested marks goes beyond whatever level of energy that the team may have – it only happens when your tactical setup is utterly incapable of containing the opposition.

It has little to do with energy when the opposition is able to walk through defensive holes in the middle of the ground, because the zone prioritises marking space over players, to the point where once opposing ball gets to the centre square the defence is opened up so comprehensively that it all but guarantees a shot on goal from directly in front.

The Telstra Tracker figures for the aerobic performance of both teams in the Round 20 match against Collingwood are similar, which dispels the obvious myth that the loss was due to being comprehensively outrun or due to a lack of effort by the players. One team ran effectively, engaging dangerous positions; the other ran wildly to guard redundant space.


Considering the club continues to obsessively select squads that are overly tall, such instruction to run when the team currently features a midfield full of players that clearly remain underdone in their conditioning, combined with less rotational support, is a recipe for a dropoff in midfield output (both offensively and defensively) to occur during matches.

Should it really any surprise then when the club concedes so many easy points late in matches?


As you can see opponents are able to burst out of the blocks against West Coast in 2021 as the system allows them to dominate possession. In response, the Eagles invariably push additional numbers up the ground to fill in holes, chase space and rally briefly; but all the extra effort in chasing shadows wears the team down, leaving the opponent free to re-gain dominance of possession during later stages – this time however, with much lower pressure being applied against them, the opponent is able to convert that dominance into easy goals on the scoreboard.

Only the bottom-placed Kangaroos have conceded more points during last quarters this season than West Coast.


The second-oldest playing list in the competition, with a ruckman that averages less than 70% time on ground, combined with a playing squad that incorporates 6-7 other key talls, in addition to restoration of 20 minute quarters, reduced rotations, shortened preseason and midfielders returning from long-term injuries…

And yet the approach is to somehow out-work the opponent and close out space, primarily through aerobic effort, in order to pin them down and gain territorial superiority.

Running is simply not a strength of this West Coast team, especially so when selection keeps finding places for unnecessary numbers of key-sized players – so expecting it to cover more ground than the opponent as a means of maintaining defensive cohesion is utterly foolish – and unfortunately will more often than not, lead to disappointing outcomes of the type that we been seeing of late.

Having more “energy” won’t make Naitanui into an 85% time on ground ruckman, much like getting Langdon to run 14km+ up the ground chasing grass won’t help the team to win ground balls in attack.

It is one thing to work hard, gut run and show effort – but if that extra effort leads to little in outcome other than early fatigue which allows the opponent to take hold of the game – then it just becomes dumb football.



Undone

However beautiful the strategy, you should occasionally look at the results — Winston Churchill

Collingwood are a poor team. Even after the Round 20 performance they remain last in the competition for averages in metres gained, inside 50s and clearances; second-last for contested possessions and third-last for points scored.

Yet by half time they were ahead of West Coast 61-11.

The Magpies ended up scoring 14 goals:
  • 13 came via ball use through the corridor
  • 10 came from West Coast turnovers
  • 9 came from chains that began in the defensive half of the ground
All the flaws in the current system were laid bare - the Eagles gave the ball away going forward and then simply could not prevent the Magpies from generating attack out of defence.

Robert Harvey, looking for just his second victory whilst in charge, simply instructed his team to perform the following:
  • Run the lanes
  • Look for the short option
  • Generate extra numbers in the corridor
  • Move the ball quickly at every opportunity
Really simple stuff. But that is all that is necessary to break the Eagles’ defence. There is nothing novel about what Collingwood did; indeed, several teams had already done as such earlier in the season.

West Coast still have not adapted to the changes made to the on the mark rule. Defensively, the Eagles still actively allow for the opposition to mark on the defensive side of the corridor – previously the mark would be held up and the subsequent kick would be directed either wide to the wing or long towards the intercept marking prowess waiting in the West Coast backline. This year however, that mark is able to offload to an overlap runner or pivot and spot-up a short target, circumventing the zone in the middle of the ground entirely and providing opportunity for very dangerous entries into attack.

This is clearly evident when one looks at the average metres gained per disposal of opponents:


Opponents create more short disposal possession chains against West Coast than any other team in the competition.

With the offensive capability teams now have at their disposal due to the recent rule changes, the days of being able to zone space through the middle are gone – if an opposing player is there somebody must go to them and mark up.

The dominance of “space” zones that are analogous to those utilised in soccer and hockey and are based more towards containing or directing opposing ball use in a certain way, is over. In their place are basketball-style “track” or hybrid zones, where players will track man-on-man with an opposing counterpart when play is in certain areas of the ground.

The first hurdle the club must overcome on the road to redemption is the abandonment of the zone defence as it currently stands.

The second hurdle relates to the ease in which opponents are able to accumulate possession. West Coast are not just bad – they are in a category all to themselves kind of bad when it comes to opposition dominance of ball.


The club are on average conceding more than 70 additional effective disposals per game in comparison to Geelong – that is the equivalent of providing the opponent with an extra three good players on the ground.

The Round 20 match was the third time in 2021 that the club found itself losing uncontested possessions by more than 100. In more than half of matches this season, the Eagles have lost uncontested possessions by 30 or more.

So, what’s up with that? A club with a (on paper at least) strong midfield contingent that includes arguably the best outside runner of the past decade in Gaff but is being repeatedly obliterated for outside ball by opponents. The answer, once again, lies in tactical absurdity.

As has been described previously on several occasions now, opponents look to nullify the stoppage impact of Naitanui by creating extras through the middle, usually from half forward as the West Coast defence prefers to hold their position rather than track opponents up the ground.

With the advantage of unchecked extras around stoppage, opponents are able to actively block out the primary midfielders of the Eagles, whilst leaving open channels for their team-mates to exploit in the advent of them winning the clearance. The effect can be observed in the contrast for the club between clearances from centre bounces (where opponents cannot create extras due to 6-6-6 positioning) and those from stoppages where those opposing extras are able to be involved:


Only Richmond (who actively remove players from stoppage to setup their turnover-based gameplan) and the bottom-placed Kangaroos have a greater disparity between output at centre bounce and stoppage.

With the team struggling to break even in the middle, the go-to response by the Eagles post-2018 is to cannibalise the forward line and repurpose it as additional cover for the under-pressure defence. The result is West Coast forwards often end up spending significant periods away from where they would usually be expected to operate and forward half pressure unsurprisingly drops off a cliff. A prime example is the current use of Langdon, who has become the latest re-tread version of the redundant aerobic sweeping “Masten” role – occupying so much time in the defensive half of the ground that he is no longer really playing as a forward at all.

Of course, limiting the attack in such a way creates its own set of problems that are arguably far worse than the problem it is setting out to address. It is here that opponents are able to reaffirm their transition game, counterattacking from defence and where the club’s own ball movement from the back half suffers a lonely, withering death.

Rather, one should work to prevent the opposition from creating those midfield extras in the first place.

The third piece that requires correction is offensive ball movement (or the lack thereof).

What is the point of trying to control possession if no ground is being gained? As we as fans are all too aware, much to our frustration, the West Coast will voluntarily lose territory not just once, but multiple times in a match, trying to manufacture a slow switch in play that will never open up the opposing defence and only results in additional pressure being placed upon the Eagles’ defence that was completely unnecessary.

But for what reason is the retreat in the first place? No other club in the entire competition exhibits such risky activity that is so lacking in reward. Perhaps that is because there is a lack of options to kick to as the West Coast forwards are spending so much time up the ground to cover space defensively that they are often unavailable as offensive targets up forward. Thus the current situation is brought about, typified by slow, predictable ball movement that does not pose a threat to the opposing defence, ranking dead last of all teams for generating scores from the defensive half.

Get players ahead of the ball, stretch the opposing defence and provide those defenders with something to be worried about that creates uncertainty in terms of their positioning – that is how you create the opportunity for swift and direct ball movement that can tear a team to pieces.



A familiar solution

We are defined by what we do repeatedly; therefore excellence is a habit, not an act – Aristotle

West Coast has thus far in 2021, performed well below their potential capability. The current position of the club on the ladder however, is reflective of its level of performance this year:


So how can this gap in unfulfilled potential be bridged? And perhaps, just as importantly, how can necessary change be successfully implemented at such short notice, with just three matches remaining before finals?

Recall those three areas that need to be addressed:
  • Abandon the current zone defence
  • Prevent the opponent from positioning extras through the middle of the ground
  • Get more players ahead of the ball

Each of those can be addressed through the implementation of a fairly simple hybrid press.

Sound familiar? It was postulated in the OP of this thread:


Time to expand upon that further and offer a solution to the club’s current woes:


A press anchored at half forward supersedes the redundant zone sitting in the defensive half.

Attack:

A forward line that is mobile, maintains players ahead of ball, stretches the opposing defence and takes away the easy option for opponents to rebound out through the corridor. Despite being a press, only five specialist forward positions are used and just two of those are key-sized – there is no “land of the giants” trash going on here. Similarly, any notion of a “Neo-Masten” aerobic sweeping defensive forward is dead, buried and cremated. This is emphasis on mobility, pressure and creativity – keeping these positions forward of centre at all times and ruthlessly turning opposition turnovers into scoring opportunity.

The full forward remains deep near the goalsquare, granting them plenty of space to lead into and making any opposing defensive sweepers accountable. Specialist small forwards are positioned around CHF for both the immediate ground ball from marking contests and as overlapping secondary disposal options running in towards goal. One of those positions starts as a floater on the attacking side of forward half stoppages before going forward to hit the spillage drop zone of marking contests at pace – in a similar way to how S.Bolton is used at his most damaging at Richmond.

Defence:

A back seven featuring a pair of inverse wingers that operates more as a back five for much of the time. The inverse wings start from defensive positions and run lanes through the corridor, offering additional offensive support to the midfield and greater capability in marking opposing players in the middle of the ground. These are positions that are capable of taking possession, taking the game on and switching lanes quickly through good decisions and disposal. An ideal example of such positions used effectively is Sydney with J.Dawson and J.Lloyd.

Of the three key talls in defence, one is given greater latitude to peel away from their mark and work aggressively as the primary interceptor of incoming disposal from the opposition. Another advantage of having this number of key players down back is that one can be called upon to fulfil secondary ruck duties, leaving the structure of the forward press unaffected.

The emphasis here is to have a defence that is robust against incoming attacks, but also capable of transitioning possession quickly and feeding it through the corridor.

Midfield:

The wings start high and stay high, providing width to what is otherwise a narrow forward line. They track back defensively, but their primary instructions are to provide an outlet ahead of the ball and cut-off any diagonal kick from the opposition defence that is targeting the corridor.

The rest of the midfield group keep narrow in their positioning, ensuring representation of numbers in dangerous areas in the middle of the ground. This is also where the hybrid-nature of this press comes into play – anywhere on the ground within a rectangle bounded by the painted numbers on the 50 metre arcs, opposition players are tightly marked with as little space given as possible (i.e. in the corridor, between the arcs, defence is man-on-man).

When in possession, they look for the lane runners in the middle to get the ball forward rather than bombing it without purpose.


This is a fairly simple plan – I do not see it unreasonable to believe that a squad currently practising a far more complex set of instructions could gain knowledge of its execution pretty quickly.

Put all these pieces together and I have no doubt that you would see a remarkably different looking team in both approach and performance, despite little change in playing personnel.



This season remains incredibly open – all that is necessary is for a team to find a good vein of form at the right time and they can be the last team standing. Nobody gave the Bulldogs a chance in 2016 after losing to 16th placed Fremantle by four goals leading into finals – yet four weeks later they were being crowned premiers.


John Lennon may have said that “All you need is love”, but in football all you need is four good weeks.

With the right setup and outlook, there remains no reason those weeks cannot belong to the West Coast Eagles.
the only problem with being this analytical in footy is that it must KILL you watching us play at the moment...
 

Trouto

Premiership Player
Jul 3, 2007
3,378
3,451
Bunbury
AFL Club
West Coast
the only thing i dissagree with in your analyses is the exclusion of Oscar Allen. He needs to be included into the lineup to be able to gel with the players as he is clearly the big forward of the future for the club. I would hate to see him languishing in the 2nds and becoming disgruntled then possibly leaving. even if it means playing him out of position until JK retires, or putting him on the bench as a dedicate sub for JK/darling/natanui.
 
Oct 29, 2007
22,101
29,862
Perth Western Australia
AFL Club
West Coast
the only thing i dissagree with in your analyses is the exclusion of Oscar Allen. He needs to be included into the lineup to be able to gel with the players as he is clearly the big forward of the future for the club. I would hate to see him languishing in the 2nds and becoming disgruntled then possibly leaving. even if it means playing him out of position until JK retires, or putting him on the bench as a dedicate sub for JK/darling/natanui.

He needs a weeks rest and not exactly dropped to the WAFL.
 

Doashuey

Premiership Player
Sep 13, 2017
4,787
11,463
AFL Club
West Coast
He needs a weeks rest and not exactly dropped to the WAFL.
I agree he definitely needs a rest. But Dylans team didn't have O Allen in it, not because he could use a rest this week, but because he sees that as our best team (included injured and suspended players in Shuey ryan, willie etc). So I think, and suspect what Trouto is basing his comment on, that Dylan has left Allen out of the team as we will structure up better as a team with 2 x KPF only. It is a big call to have Allen out of the team and if fit, he could arguably take Darlings place based ion his 2021 output. However I like the thinking- we are to often selecting teams on who we think the best players available are rather than the best team from a structure perspective. With our abundance of quality talls, we either have to go in top heavy or make some really tough calls on players who are good enough to be B22 but need to miss out for us to field our best team.
 

Trouto

Premiership Player
Jul 3, 2007
3,378
3,451
Bunbury
AFL Club
West Coast
I agree he definitely needs a rest. But Dylans team didn't have O Allen in it, not because he could use a rest this week, but because he sees that as our best team (included injured and suspended players in Shuey ryan, willie etc). So I think, and suspect what Trouto is basing his comment on, that Dylan has left Allen out of the team as we will structure up better as a team with 2 x KPF only. It is a big call to have Allen out of the team and if fit, he could arguably take Darlings place based ion his 2021 output. However I like the thinking- we are to often selecting teams on who we think the best players available are rather than the best team from a structure perspective. With our abundance of quality talls, we either have to go in top heavy or make some really tough calls on players who are good enough to be B22 but need to miss out for us to field our best team.
yep, correct.
 

Wooju82

Draftee
Aug 8, 2016
2
15
AFL Club
West Coast
Would love to get Dylan82 thoughts on this - but in the last 6 matches (2-4) WCE have actually won the i50 count in all of these games. This coincides with the significant calls for a style change (and acknowledgement of some changes needing to be made) post the WB and Syd smashings.
Over recent seasons, and earlier this year a hallmark of the Eagles was to often lose this stat but be saved by incredible efficiency when forward - whilst being very effective in limiting the opposition in their attacks.

Our forward efficiency in particular has fallen through the floor, which indicates possibly a few things, but mainly
- The subtle changes we have made in game style is significantly reducing the quality of forward entries
- We don't have the cattle to pressure effectively when the ball is coming in, and the oppo are able to easily launch quick attacks. The flow on being that prioritising field position and territory is actually a big negative for us.

In recent seasons West Coast at least drawing equal in the i50 stat would almost g'tee a win. It probably is a good recent example of subtle changes in game style Simpson has made to - but for things to operate effectively is very tough in a few short weeks.
 

Eagles_712

Senior List
Nov 7, 2007
204
122
Perth
AFL Club
West Coast
Would love to get Dylan82 thoughts on this - but in the last 6 matches (2-4) WCE have actually won the i50 count in all of these games. This coincides with the significant calls for a style change (and acknowledgement of some changes needing to be made) post the WB and Syd smashings.
Over recent seasons, and earlier this year a hallmark of the Eagles was to often lose this stat but be saved by incredible efficiency when forward - whilst being very effective in limiting the opposition in their attacks.

Our forward efficiency in particular has fallen through the floor, which indicates possibly a few things, but mainly
- The subtle changes we have made in game style is significantly reducing the quality of forward entries
- We don't have the cattle to pressure effectively when the ball is coming in, and the oppo are able to easily launch quick attacks. The flow on being that prioritising field position and territory is actually a big negative for us.

In recent seasons West Coast at least drawing equal in the i50 stat would almost g'tee a win. It probably is a good recent example of subtle changes in game style Simpson has made to - but for things to operate effectively is very tough in a few short weeks.

yes weve been equal to the i50, but all slow ball movement meant every team in the comp has been able to flood the backline. That the new gamestyle as well. Since everyone is relying so much on pace, the only way to score easily is through counterattacks.

Geelong is everything west coast should be right now. Slow ball movement when needed. But if there an opportunity to attack go hard. If the ball is going to the inside the 50, bomb it long. If your 50 out, go for goal. You know what you can do and what you cant do, you know you cant defend against the counter attack so you keep inside the 50 deep. There no point going for a 15 meter chip to gain 5 meters with a probability of 50 % to make it.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back